Literature DB >> 16447392

Is size perception based on monocular distance cues computed automatically?

Liat Goldfarb1, Joseph Tzelgov.   

Abstract

The study reported here examined whether size perception based on monocular distance cues is computed automatically. Participants were presented with a picture containing distance cues, which was superimposed with a pair of digits differing in numerical value. One digit was presented so as to be perceived as closer than the other. The digits were of similar physical size but differed in their perceptual size. The participants' task was to decide which digit was numerically larger. It was found that the decision took longer and resulted in more errors when the perceptual size of the numerically larger digit was smaller than the perceptual size of the numerically smaller digit. These results show that perceived size affects performance in a task that does not require size or distance computation. Hence, for the first time, there is empirical support for the working assumption of the visual perception approach that size perception based on monocular distance cues is computed automatically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16447392     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

1.  The reverse Stroop effect.

Authors:  F H Durgin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

2.  Automatic comparisons of artificial digits never compared: learning linear ordering relations.

Authors:  J Tzelgov; V Yehene; L Kotler; A Alon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 3.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.

Authors:  C M MacLeod
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  The ecology of automaticity: toward establishing the conditions needed to produce automatic processing effects.

Authors:  J A Bargh
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1992

Review 5.  Specifying the relations between automaticity and consciousness: a theoretical note.

Authors:  J Tzelgov
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1997 Jun-Sep

6.  Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention.

Authors:  C M Moore; H Egeth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Ideographic and alphabetic processing in skilled reading of English.

Authors:  D Besner; M Coltheart
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Minimodularity and the perception of layout.

Authors:  N Bruno; J E Cutting
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-06

9.  Direct and indirect perception of size.

Authors:  J Norman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-10

10.  Is three greater than five: the relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks.

Authors:  A Henik; J Tzelgov
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1982-07
View more
  4 in total

1.  Quantities, amounts, and the numerical core system.

Authors:  Avishai Henik; Tali Leibovich; Sharon Naparstek; Liana Diesendruck; Orly Rubinsten
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Grasping numbers: evidence for automatic influence of numerical magnitude on grip aperture.

Authors:  Gal Namdar; Joseph Tzelgov; Daniel Algom; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

3.  Counting distance: Effects of egocentric distance on numerical perception.

Authors:  Nurit Gronau; Anna Izoutcheev; Tsafnat Nave; Avishai Henik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects.

Authors:  Erez Freud; Bat-Sheva Hadad; Galia Avidan; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.