Literature DB >> 16446072

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency: assessment with high-resolution submillimeter 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) versus coronary angiography.

Katharina Anders1, Ulrich Baum, Michael Schmid, Dieter Ropers, Axel Schmid, Karsten Pohle, Werner G Daniel, Werner Bautz, Stephan Achenbach.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the ability of 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) to visualize coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency and to detect bypass stenoses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with 94 grafts (20 mammary artery grafts, 74 venous grafts) were investigated by 16-slice MDCT using a scan protocol with 12 x 0.75 mm slice collimation (pitch 0.3), 420 ms rotation time and simultaneous electrocardiogram (ECG)-registration. One hundred milliliters iodinated contrast agent were injected with a delay according to the individually determined contrast agent transit time. Patients with heart rates above 60 bpm received oral beta-blockade. Cross-sectional images with a slice width of 1.0 mm (0.5 mm increment) were reconstructed using an ECG-gated half-scan reconstruction or a multisegment reconstruction algorithm depending on the heart rate. Bypass grafts were evaluated concerning patency and presence of stenoses > or = 50% diameter reduction on cross-sectional images, multiplanar reformations and maximum intensity projections by two independent observers. Results were compared to coronary bypass angiography.
RESULTS: Sixteen-slice MDCT results were compared to those of invasive coronary angiography concerning absence or presence of bypass graft occlusion or relevant stenosis > or = 50% lumen reduction. Coronary CT angiography (CTA) permitted detection of bypass occlusion with 100% sensitivity (28/28) and 98% specificity (64/65). Seventy-eight percent (observer 1) and 84% (observer 2) of all patent grafts were found to be evaluable concerning presence or absence of stenosis. In 34 of 40 (observer 1) and 38 of 43 (observer 2) bypass grafts, high-grade stenoses were correctly ruled out (specificity 85% versus 88%, sensitivity 80% and 82%). Yet, if all patients with either unevaluable grafts/graft anastomosis or relevant graft stenosis were excluded, only 8/32 patients (25%) had fully diagnostic "negative" graft-CTA. According to Kappa statistics, agreement between the observers was 1.0 and 0.93 concerning occlusion and relevant stenosis, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Sixteen-slice coronary CTA with sub-millimeter spatial resolution and premedication with oral beta-blockade permits non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts with decreasing numbers of unevaluable graft segments. However, patient-based analysis reveals that only a relatively small number of patients ("negative" and completely evaluable graft-CTA) truly profits from noninvasive work-up and could be spared invasive angiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16446072     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  25 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography in patients post-coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  James K Min; Minisha Kochar
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2012 May-Jun

2.  Coronary computed tomographic angiography: competitive or complementary?

Authors:  Gregory S Thomas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Comprehensive cardiac CT study: evaluation of coronary arteries, left ventricular function, and myocardial perfusion--is it possible?

Authors:  Ricardo C Cury; Koen Nieman; Michael D Shapiro; Khurram Nasir; Roberto C Cury; Thomas J Brady
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Use of high-resolution spiral CT for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Willem B Meijboom; Niels van Pelt; Pim de Feyter
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-02

5.  Evaluation of temporal windows for coronary artery bypass graft imaging with 64-slice CT.

Authors:  Lotus Desbiolles; Sebastian Leschka; André Plass; Hans Scheffel; Lars Husmann; Oliver Gaemperli; Elisabeth Garzoli; Borut Marincek; Philipp A Kaufmann; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  The 'what, when, where, who and how?' of cardiac computed tomography in 2009: guidelines for the clinician.

Authors:  B J W Chow; E Larose; S Bilodeau; M L Ellins; P Galiwango; M Kass; T Sheth; D S Jassal; I D C Kirkpatrick; G B John Mancini; J Mayo; A Abraham; J White
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 7.  History of cardiac computed tomography: single to 320-detector row multislice computed tomography.

Authors:  Gregory S Hurlock; Hiroshi Higashino; Teruhito Mochizuki
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  MSCT evaluation of patients with prior coronary bypass surgery: what we have and what we lack.

Authors:  Nuno Bettencourt; Amedeo Chiribiri; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Non-invasive coronary angiography: the clinical value of multi-slice computed tomography in the assessment of patients with prior coronary bypass surgery. Evaluating grafts and native vessels.

Authors:  Helge von Kiedrowski; Marcus Wiemer; Krista Franzke; Rainer Preuss; Bernhard Vaske; Thomas Butz; Olaf Oldenburg; Thomas Bitter; Khalid Mahmood; Wolfram Burchert; Dieter Horstkotte; Christoph Langer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  Coronary artery bypass grafts and MDCT imaging: what to know and what to look for.

Authors:  Riccardo Marano; Carlo Liguori; Pierluigi Rinaldi; Maria Luigia Storto; Marco Angelo Politi; Giancarlo Savino; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.