Literature DB >> 16445968

Type II versus Type III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: comparison of lower urinary tract dysfunctions.

Francesco Raspagliesi1, Antonino Ditto, Rosanna Fontanelli, Flavia Zanaboni, Eugenio Solima, Gianbattista Spatti, Francesco Hanozet, Francesca Vecchione, Gabriella Rossi, Shigeki Kusamura.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: According to our previous experience, Type III Nerve-sparing Radical hysterectomy (NSRH) for cervical cancer presented an acceptable urologic morbidity, without compromising radicality. The aim of this study was to compare Type NSRH with other types of RH in terms of incidence of early bladder dysfunctions and perioperative complications.
METHODS: One hundred and ten patients with cervical cancer were submitted to Type II RH (group 1), Type III NSRH (group 2) and Type III RH (group 3). We assessed the postoperative early bladder function and complications. The follow-up period was 3 months.
RESULTS: Group 1 had a significantly shorter duration of the surgery, minor mean blood loss and shorter mean length of postoperative stay when compared to groups 2 and 3. No intraoperative complications were reported in either of the groups. The groups did not differ significantly in terms of GIII/IV morbidity (group 1 = 10%, group 2 = 10% and group 3 = 15%, chi(2), P value: 0.65). Not even they differed in terms of urologic GI-IV morbidity (group 1 = 13%, group 2 = 15% and group 3 = 10%, chi(2), P value = 0.88). Groups 1 and 2 presented a prompt recover of bladder function, significantly different from that of group 3. There was a significant difference between the groups regarding the number of patients discharged with self-catheterism (group 1 = 0; group 2 and group 3 = 11; chi(2), P value << 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The Type III NSRH seems to be comparable to Type II RH and superior to Type III RH in terms of early bladder dysfunctions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16445968     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  12 in total

1.  Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for treatment of uterine malignant tumors: analysis of short-term therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Zehua Wang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-17

Review 2.  Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa).

Authors:  Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Apiwat Aue-Aungkul; Khadra Galaal; Chetta Ngamjarus; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-12

3.  Anatomical basis of female pelvic cavity for nerve sparing radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Haili Li; Jianxin Jia; Yanlai Xiao; Lin Kang; Huixian Cui
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Value of diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting parametrial invasion in stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jung Jae Park; Chan Kyo Kim; Sung Yoon Park; Byung Kwan Park; Bohyun Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Lower urinary tract dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Fouad Aoun; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Xianghua Yin; Min Shi; Jianbo Xu; Qinhao Guo; Huan Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

Review 7.  Urological complications after treatment of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Esther M K Wit; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 8.  Can We Be Less Radical with Surgery for Early Cervical Cancer?

Authors:  Madeleine C Macdonald; John A Tidy
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Apiwat Aue-Aungkul; Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Siwanon Rattanakanokchai; Khadra Galaal; Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan; Chetta Ngamjarus; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-01-25

10.  Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: rationale, technique, results.

Authors:  Elisabeth Gottschalk; Malgorzata Lanowska; Vito Chiantera; Simone Marnitz; Achim Schneider; Verena Brink-Spalink; Kati Hasenbein; Christhardt Koehler
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.