Literature DB >> 16445863

RNAi dependent epigenetic marks on a geminivirus promoter.

Afzal Muhammad Dogar1.   

Abstract

Nicotiana benthamiana plants were stably transformed with an intron-spliced dsRNA producing construct cognate to bidirectional promoter of African cassava mosaic geminivirus (ACMV) DNA A. Transgenic lines expressed multiple siRNAs species upon ACMV infection. The de novo DNA methylation and an increased proportion of histone H3 Lysine-9 methylation (H3K9) at intergenic region (IGR) of ACMV DNA A were observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16445863      PMCID: PMC1402257          DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-3-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virol J        ISSN: 1743-422X            Impact factor:   4.099


Introduction

In plants RNA interference or post transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) acts as a natural anti-viral defense system for neutralizing pathogenic nucleic acids either through a change in RNA stability in the cytoplasm or through mechanisms that use the RNA itself to induce methylation and silencing of homologous nuclear genes [1]. In addition there are more than one Dicer and Argonaute proteins in plants e.g. Arabidopsis genome encodes four Dicers [2] and ten Argonate orthologs [3]. Geminiviruses are single-stranded circular DNA viruses that cause economically significant diseases in a wide range of crop plants worldwide [4]. They replicate in the plant cell nuclei through transcription and replication competent double stranded DNA intermediate, which is packed into nucleosomes from host cells [5]. In plants, some geminivirus-host interactions naturally lead to host recovery e.g. natural recovery response induced by ACMV-infected N. benthamiana and cassava involves siRNAs originating from geminivirus genome [6]. However the affect of siRNAs at the virus genome remained to be seen. Here I show multiple siRNAs species in transgenic plants direct the methylation of ACMV DNA A as well as the methylation at lysine-9 residues of histone H3 wrapping the promoter region in the virus genome.

The study

A 360 nucleotides fragment corresponding to the intergenic region of ACMV DNA A (GenBank: NC_001467) was cloned in sense and anti-sense orientation interrupted with a synthetic plant intron. The left arm KpnI-ClaI and right arm XhoI-BamI fragments were PCR amplifed and cloned into dsproA VMYMV- int vector [7]. The EcoRI-XbaI fragment of this vector was cloned into pCambia 1300. The following primers used for amplification the left arm (KpnI F: GGTACCAATCTCAACTAGAGACACTCTTGA) and (ClaI R: ATCGATGCACAAATATTTAATTGCCAG), and the right arm (XhoI F: CTCGACGCAGTTTATAAATTAACGGGTC) and (BamHI R: GGATCCAATGAGTTGATCTCTGTGAGAACT). The resulting binary construct was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens LBA4404 by electroporation with a Gene Pulser apparatus (Bio-Rad). Seeds of wild type Nicotina benthamiana were grown on MS media at 25 to 27°C under artificial light (150 μmol s-1 m-2) for 16 h per day. Transgenic shoots were selected on Hygromycin at a concentration of 250 μg ml-1 and grown at 25 to 27°C under artificial light (150 μmol s-1 m-2) for 16 h per day. Seeds of T1 lines were grown on MS and two weeks old seedlings were infected with the infectious clones of ACMV Kenyan strain DNA A and ACMV Cameroon strain DNA B (GenBank: AF112353) using Bio Rad particle delivery system as previously described [8]. The siRNA isolation and analysis was performed as described previously [2]. The DNA probe used for siRNA northern hybridization (AGGGGCCAACCGTATAATATTACCC) corresponds to the Nona-nucleotide sequence within ACMV DNA A. Total DNA was extracted from different plant lines. 10 to 15 μg of DNA samples were digested overnight with Sau96 I. Resolved by electrophoresis on 0.8 to 1.0 % agarose gel and transfered overnight to a Hybond-N membrane. Southern hybridization was carried out with an ACMV DNA A promoter specific DNA probe labeled with digoxigenin (DIG) (Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals) as described by manufacturers. The Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was performed as described previously [9]. Anti-dimethyl-histone H3 [Lys9] #07–212 and anti- dimethyl-histone H3 [Lys4] #07–030 were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology. Each of the immunoprecipitation was performed at least three independent times. For each PCR reaction 2 μl of each immunoprecipiate used to amplify of the viral DNA and endogenous control. All PCR reactions were done in 25 μl volume, starting with 5 min at 96°C, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C (15 s), 57°C (30 s), and 72°C (5 min). The PCR reactions were analysed by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel. The primer pairs used were ACMV DNA A F: CTCAACTAGAGACACTCTTGA and R: CACAAATATTTAATTGCCAG, Tnt-retroposon (GenBank: X13777) F: CATTGGTTCTAAAGGATGTGCGGC and R: GAAATCTCATCTTGTGCCGCGTTC.

Results and conclusion

A transgene consisting of the promoter region of ACMV DNA A was designed to produce double stranded RNA (Figure 1A). A similar construct was shown to reduce the accumulation of Vigna mungo yellow mosaic geminivirus (VMYMV) in transient transfection system [7]. The Nicotiana benthamiana plants were transformed by Agrobacteium-mediated gene transfer. Resulting transgenic lines were infected with ACMV and tested for siRNA expression. Non-infected transgenic plants showed two classes of siRNAs, a less abundant 24–25 nt and more abundant 21–22 nt size class. However ACMV-infected transgenic lines showed small RNAs of approximate sizes, 21–22, 24–25 nt and also higher molecular weight siRNA size class, with equally higher expression intensities (Figure 1B–C).
Figure 1

Small RNA expression in ACMV-infected and non-infected transgenic and vector control plants. (A) Schematic diagram of the binary construct used for plant transformation. LB, left border. RB, right border (B, C) Northern hybridization showing various siRNA size classes, two lower arrows indicate (known) approximate sizes and upper arrow indicate higher molecular weight size.

Small RNA expression in ACMV-infected and non-infected transgenic and vector control plants. (A) Schematic diagram of the binary construct used for plant transformation. LB, left border. RB, right border (B, C) Northern hybridization showing various siRNA size classes, two lower arrows indicate (known) approximate sizes and upper arrow indicate higher molecular weight size. I analyzed the molecular effects of these abundant small RNAs on ACMV genome in transgenic and vector control plants. The 21–22 nt siRNA class has been implicated in virus RNA and transgene mRNA degradation, whereas the longer size class 24–25 nt, in directing retroelement DNA methylation [2]. To test the methylation status of episomal DNA virus, the total genomic DNA from ACMV-infected transgenic and vector control plants was digested with methylation sensitive enzyme Sau 96I. Southern hybridization was performed by using an ACMV DNA A promoter sequence specific probe. Analysis showed that at least three to four sites in the ACMV DNA A promoter region were protected from digestion only in siRNA expressing lines but not in vector control plant (Figure 2A–B). The sites protected by methylation flank the Nona-nucleotide sequence (which is the origin of replication or ori) in ACMV DNA A intergenic region as the same sequence was used to probe siRNAs.
Figure 2

Small RNA-directed DNA and histone methylation. (A) Schematic representation of Sau96 I restriction sites in ACMV DNA A promoter region and expected sizes recognized by this probe (B) Southern hybridization showing fragments of ACMV generated by Sau96 I, arrows indicate fragments generated in vector control and protected in siRNA producing plants (C) ChIP duplex PCR analysis using ACMV DNA A promoter and Tnt-retroposon specific primers, sizes are indicated. K4, anti-dimethylated histone H3 lysine 4. K9, anti-dimethylated histone H3 lysine 9. VC, vector control.

Small RNA-directed DNA and histone methylation. (A) Schematic representation of Sau96 I restriction sites in ACMV DNA A promoter region and expected sizes recognized by this probe (B) Southern hybridization showing fragments of ACMV generated by Sau96 I, arrows indicate fragments generated in vector control and protected in siRNA producing plants (C) ChIP duplex PCR analysis using ACMV DNA A promoter and Tnt-retroposon specific primers, sizes are indicated. K4, anti-dimethylated histone H3 lysine 4. K9, anti-dimethylated histone H3 lysine 9. VC, vector control. The 24–25 nt siRNAs class along with Argonaute-4 has also been shown for retroelement silencing through histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) methylation in Arabidopsis [10]. The geminiviruses exist as minichromosomes in plant cells [5]. The histone methylation patterns of ACMV minichromosomes were determined by chromatin immunoprecipitation using anti-dimethyl histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) and anti-dimethyl histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9). The ChIP PCR amplified an equal amount of ACMV DNA A promoter region fragment in the H3K4 immunprecipiates from both transgenic and vector control plants. However the enrichment of the same fragment in the H3K9 immunprecipiate was lower from the vector control plant compared to the small RNA producing transgenic plants (Figure 2C). The presence of three small RNA species in these transgenic plants upon ACMV infection raises the possibility that RNAi might operate at three levels during DNA virus infection i.e. the mRNAs transcribed from geminivirus genome are subject to degradation by 21–22 nt small RNAs [6]. The geminiviral genomic DNA seems to be subject of RNA dependent DNA methylation (RdDM) by 24–25 nt small RNAs. However the observation showing an additional higher molecular weight siRNA class in transgenic plants might be similar to those 28 nt siRNAs observed in Tetrahymena [11]. And the fact that a micrococcal nuclease homologue also co-purifies with the RNAi effector complexes [12], raises further question whether the plants also possess small RNA directed DNA elimination mechanism in order to defend themselves from DNA viruses.

Competing interests

The author(s) declares that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

AMD carried out all experimental work and drafted the manuscript.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Gene silencing as an adaptive defence against viruses.

Authors:  P M Waterhouse; M B Wang; T Lough
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  High molecular weight RNAs and small interfering RNAs induce systemic posttranscriptional gene silencing in plants.

Authors:  Ulrich Klahre; Patrice Crété; Sabrina A Leuenberger; Victor A Iglesias; Frederick Meins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Two classes of short interfering RNA in RNA silencing.

Authors:  Andrew Hamilton; Olivier Voinnet; Louise Chappell; David Baulcombe
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-09-02       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  RNAi targeting of DNA virus in plants.

Authors:  Mikhail Pooggin; P V Shivaprasad; K Veluthambi; Thomas Hohn
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 5.  Geminiviruses and RNA silencing.

Authors:  Ramachandran Vanitharani; Padmanabhan Chellappan; Claude M Fauquet
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 18.313

6.  Abutilon mosaic geminivirus double-stranded DNA is packed into minichromosomes.

Authors:  M Pilartz; H Jeske
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.616

7.  Analysis of a piwi-related gene implicates small RNAs in genome rearrangement in tetrahymena.

Authors:  Kazufumi Mochizuki; Noah A Fine; Toshitaka Fujisawa; Martin A Gorovsky
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-09-20       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Dependence of heterochromatic histone H3 methylation patterns on the Arabidopsis gene DDM1.

Authors:  Anne-Valérie Gendrel; Zachary Lippman; Cristy Yordan; Vincent Colot; Robert A Martienssen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Short interfering RNA accumulation correlates with host recovery in DNA virus-infected hosts, and gene silencing targets specific viral sequences.

Authors:  Padmanabhan Chellappan; Ramachandran Vanitharani; Justin Pita; Claude M Fauquet
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  ARGONAUTE4 control of locus-specific siRNA accumulation and DNA and histone methylation.

Authors:  Daniel Zilberman; Xiaofeng Cao; Steven E Jacobsen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-01-09       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  RNA silencing suppression by plant pathogens: defence, counter-defence and counter-counter-defence.

Authors:  Nathan Pumplin; Olivier Voinnet
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  RNAi-mediated resistance against Cotton leaf curl disease in elite Indian cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cultivar Narasimha.

Authors:  Sameena Khatoon; Abhinav Kumar; Neera B Sarin; Jawaid A Khan
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.332

3.  RNA silencing against geminivirus: complementary action of posttranscriptional gene silencing and transcriptional gene silencing in host recovery.

Authors:  Edgar A Rodríguez-Negrete; Jimena Carrillo-Tripp; Rafael F Rivera-Bustamante
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 4.  Multifaceted role of geminivirus associated betasatellite in pathogenesis.

Authors:  Prabu Gnanasekaran; Reddy KishoreKumar; Dhriti Bhattacharyya; R Vinoth Kumar; Supriya Chakraborty
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 5.663

5.  A virus-encoded protein suppresses methylation of the viral genome through its interaction with AGO4 in the Cajal body.

Authors:  Liping Wang; Yi Ding; Li He; Guiping Zhang; Jian-Kang Zhu; Rosa Lozano-Duran
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Attenuation of Histone Methyltransferase KRYPTONITE-mediated transcriptional gene silencing by Geminivirus.

Authors:  Yan-Wei Sun; Chuan-Sia Tee; Yong-Huan Ma; Gang Wang; Xiang-Mei Yao; Jian Ye
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.