A Sternberg1, A Mizrahi, M Amar, G Groisman. 1. Department of Surgery A, Hillel Yaffe Medical Centre, Hadera 38100, and the Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, the Technion, Haifa, Israel. Sternberg_a@hillel-yaffe.health.gov.il
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Venous invasion (VI) is an important prognosis predictor after colorectal carcinoma (CRC) resection, enabling more accurate staging and influencing postoperative management. AIMS: To assess/compare various tissue block types (perpendicular, tangential, across mesentery (AM), from major vessels or lymph nodes (LNs)) for VI detection in CRC. METHODS: Fifty two CRCs (51 colectomies, one polypectomy) were studied. Tumours were measured, surface area calculated, and colorectum and bowel wall sites recorded. Weigert's staining for elastin facilitated VI detection. VI sites, type, and amount were recorded. Ratios of relative yield of tissue block types to their frequency were calculated. RESULTS: Average numbers of tissue blocks/colectomy specimen were: perpendicular, 10.2; tangential, 9.1; AM, 3.3; from major vessels, 2.1. Average number of LNs examined was 16.47. VI was detected in 22 tumours. Overall, VI was detected in 16 perpendicular, seven tangential, five AM, and two LN blocks. VI was detected in eight, two, one, and three tumours in perpendicular, tangential, LN, and AM blocks alone, respectively. In seven tumours, VI was identified in multiple tissue block types. The average number of blocks obtained was 39.7, 42.1, and 38 from all tumours, VI positive, and VI negative tumours, respectively (p = 0.0497). Efficacy to detect VI was 2.151, 2.088, 1.092, 0.172, and 0 for AM, perpendicular, tangential, LN, and mesenteric vessel blocks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: VI was identified most frequently and in eight cases only in perpendicular blocks. However, extramural VI was detected in six tumours only in blocks cut tangentially, AM, or from harvested LNs. Hence, all these types of blocks should be submitted routinely and scanned for VI.
BACKGROUND: Venous invasion (VI) is an important prognosis predictor after colorectal carcinoma (CRC) resection, enabling more accurate staging and influencing postoperative management. AIMS: To assess/compare various tissue block types (perpendicular, tangential, across mesentery (AM), from major vessels or lymph nodes (LNs)) for VI detection in CRC. METHODS: Fifty two CRCs (51 colectomies, one polypectomy) were studied. Tumours were measured, surface area calculated, and colorectum and bowel wall sites recorded. Weigert's staining for elastin facilitated VI detection. VI sites, type, and amount were recorded. Ratios of relative yield of tissue block types to their frequency were calculated. RESULTS: Average numbers of tissue blocks/colectomy specimen were: perpendicular, 10.2; tangential, 9.1; AM, 3.3; from major vessels, 2.1. Average number of LNs examined was 16.47. VI was detected in 22 tumours. Overall, VI was detected in 16 perpendicular, seven tangential, five AM, and two LN blocks. VI was detected in eight, two, one, and three tumours in perpendicular, tangential, LN, and AM blocks alone, respectively. In seven tumours, VI was identified in multiple tissue block types. The average number of blocks obtained was 39.7, 42.1, and 38 from all tumours, VI positive, and VI negative tumours, respectively (p = 0.0497). Efficacy to detect VI was 2.151, 2.088, 1.092, 0.172, and 0 for AM, perpendicular, tangential, LN, and mesenteric vessel blocks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: VI was identified most frequently and in eight cases only in perpendicular blocks. However, extramural VI was detected in six tumours only in blocks cut tangentially, AM, or from harvested LNs. Hence, all these types of blocks should be submitted routinely and scanned for VI.
Authors: D Blumberg; P B Paty; A I Picon; J G Guillem; D S Klimstra; B D Minsky; S H Quan; A M Cohen Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Daniel Baumhoer; Thore Thiesler; Christoph A Maurer; Andreas Huber; Gieri Cathomas Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2010-02-09 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Bartlomiej Szynglarewicz; Rafal Matkowski; Agnieszka Halon; Aleksandra Lacko; Marcin Stepien; Jozef Forgacz; Marek Pudelko; Jan Kornafel Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: Lukasz A Adamczyk; Kristiana Gordon; Ivana Kholová; Lorine B Meijer-Jorna; Niklas Telinius; Patrick J Gallagher; Allard C van der Wal; Ulrik Baandrup Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Monirath Hav; Louis Libbrecht; Liesbeth Ferdinande; Karen Geboes; Piet Pattyn; Claude A Cuvelier Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Jun Li; Shengke Yang; Junjie Hu; Hao Liu; Feng Du; Jie Yin; Sai Liu; Ci Li; Shasha Xing; Jiatian Yuan; Bo Lv; Jun Fan; Shusheng Leng; Xin Zhang; Bing Wang Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-04-05
Authors: Cristina Graham Martínez; Nikki Knijn; Marcel Verheij; Iris D Nagtegaal; Rachel S van der Post Journal: Histopathology Date: 2019-02-10 Impact factor: 5.087