Literature DB >> 16443104

Reference points for radial head prosthesis size.

Job N Doornberg1, Durk S Linzel, David Zurakowski, David Ring.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Metallic radial head implants are useful when the radial head cannot be repaired reliably and when either the elbow or the forearm is unstable. Problems arise when the radial head prosthesis is too thick, causing erosions of the capitellum and incongruity of the ulnohumeral joint. We used quantitative 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis to investigate the relative height of the radial head relative to the lateral edge and central ridge of the coronoid process as reference points for optimal insertion of a radial head prosthesis.
METHODS: Seventeen computed tomography scans of the elbow were analyzed. The anatomic coronal plane of the forearm was determined using 3-dimensional images and a 2-dimensional image bisecting the articular surface of the radial head was created in this plane. The distance between the plane of the articular surface of the radial head and parallel planes at the most proximal aspect of the coronoid (the central ridge) and the lateral edge of the coronoid articular surface were measured. Negative values indicate the radial head is proximal to the coronoid.
RESULTS: The average distance between the planes defined by the radial head articular surface and the coronoid central ridge was -0.8 mm. The average distance between the planes defined by the radial head articular surface and the lateral edge of the coronoid articular surface was -0.9 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Because the radial head was on average only 0.9 mm more proximal than the lateral edge of the coronoid process and because the key is to not overstuff the joint a useful general guideline would be to place the plane of the articular surface of the radial head even with or just slightly more proximal than the lateral edge of the coronoid articular surface. Considering the substantial variability of the normal height of the articular surface of the radial head with respect to that of the coronoid, preoperative radiographs of the opposite elbow may be useful to avoid overstuffing the elbow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16443104     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  18 in total

1.  Can ulnar variance be used to detect overstuffing after radial head arthroplasty?

Authors:  Jun-Gyu Moon; Jin-Ho Hong; Nitin Bither; Won-Yong Shon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Simple overlay device for determining radial head and neck height.

Authors:  Jun-Gyu Moon; Richard D Southgate; James S Fitzsimmons; Shawn W O'Driscoll
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Anthropometric study of the proximal radius: does radial head implant fit in all cases?

Authors:  Soo Hwan Kang; Dong Yeop Kim; Hyunwoo Park; Hyun Seok Song
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Comminuted radial head fractures treated with pyrocarbon prosthetic replacement.

Authors:  Claudia Lamas; Juan Castellanos; Ignacio Proubasta; Enrique Dominguez
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2010-06-15

5.  Complications after radial head arthroplasty: a comparison between short-stemmed bipolar and monopolar long-stemmed osteointegrative rigidly fixed prostheses.

Authors:  Yves Gramlich; Eva-Lorine Krausch; Alexander Klug; Johannes Buckup; Kay Schmidt-Horlohé; Reinhard Hoffmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  [Primary radial head arthroplasty in trauma : Complications].

Authors:  K Schmidt-Horlohé; S Buschbeck; D Wincheringer; M Weißenberger; R Hoffmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  Complications of radial head prostheses.

Authors:  Stéphanie Delclaux; Julie Lebon; Amélie Faraud; Julien Toulemonde; Nicolas Bonnevialle; Bertrand Coulet; Pierre Mansat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Treatment of radial head and neck fractures: in favor of anatomical reconstruction.

Authors:  K J Burkhart; K Wegmann; J Dargel; C Ries; L P Mueller
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  Fixation versus replacement of radial head in terrible triad: is there a difference in elbow stability and prognosis?

Authors:  Tyler Steven Watters; Grant E Garrigues; David Ring; David S Ruch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Analysis of Radial Head Implant Length with Use of Contralateral Elbow Radiographs.

Authors:  George S Athwal; Dominique M Rouleau; Joy C MacDermid; Graham J W King
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2012-03-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.