OBJECTIVE: To define upper-limb movement deficits in children with hemiplegia using 3-dimensional (3-D) kinematic analysis of functional tasks. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: University gait laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Ten children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (mean age, 13.3y; range, 10-17y) and 10 control children (mean age, 9.8y; range, 6-12y). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: 3-D upper-limb movement analysis. RESULTS: 3-D kinematics detected clinically significant between-group differences. Children with hemiplegia were significantly slower than control children in time taken to complete tasks (P<.05) and achieved slower movement velocities (P<.05). Group differences in range of motion (ROM) occurred in all 3 tasks examined (hand to mouth, hand to head, reach). Children with hemiplegia had significantly less supination (P<.03) and shoulder flexion (P<.03) and increased compensatory trunk flexion (P<.01) compared with control data (hand-to-mouth task). The reach task highlighted restriction of elbow extension in children with hemiplegia (minimum elbow extension: hemiplegia, 24+/-18 degrees ; control, 3+/-7 degrees ). Completing tasks bilaterally did not alter performance of the tasks in children with hemiplegia. CONCLUSIONS: 3-D kinematics detected deficits in timing, ROM, and proximal compensatory strategies during upper-limb functional task performance in children with hemiplegia.
OBJECTIVE: To define upper-limb movement deficits in children with hemiplegia using 3-dimensional (3-D) kinematic analysis of functional tasks. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: University gait laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Ten children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (mean age, 13.3y; range, 10-17y) and 10 control children (mean age, 9.8y; range, 6-12y). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: 3-D upper-limb movement analysis. RESULTS: 3-D kinematics detected clinically significant between-group differences. Children with hemiplegia were significantly slower than control children in time taken to complete tasks (P<.05) and achieved slower movement velocities (P<.05). Group differences in range of motion (ROM) occurred in all 3 tasks examined (hand to mouth, hand to head, reach). Children with hemiplegia had significantly less supination (P<.03) and shoulder flexion (P<.03) and increased compensatory trunk flexion (P<.01) compared with control data (hand-to-mouth task). The reach task highlighted restriction of elbow extension in children with hemiplegia (minimum elbow extension: hemiplegia, 24+/-18 degrees ; control, 3+/-7 degrees ). Completing tasks bilaterally did not alter performance of the tasks in children with hemiplegia. CONCLUSIONS: 3-D kinematics detected deficits in timing, ROM, and proximal compensatory strategies during upper-limb functional task performance in children with hemiplegia.
Authors: Ana Carolina de Campos; Sahana N Kukke; Mark Hallett; Katharine E Alter; Diane L Damiano Journal: J Child Neurol Date: 2014-01-05 Impact factor: 1.987
Authors: Anil Sindhurakar; Samuel D Butensky; Eric Meyers; Joshua Santos; Thelma Bethea; Ashley Khalili; Andrew P Sloan; Robert L Rennaker; Jason B Carmel Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2016-08-20 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Christina Strohrmann; Rob Labruyère; Corinna N Gerber; Hubertus J van Hedel; Bert Arnrich; Gerhard Tröster Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 4.262