CONTEXT: Research has demonstrated substantial differences between end-of-life care in rural and urban settings. As the end of life approaches, rural elders are less likely to be hospitalized, to be placed in an intensive care unit, or to have a feeding tube, compared to their urban counterparts. These differences cannot be fully explained by rural-urban differences in access to medical services. PURPOSE: To describe and understand rural-urban differences in attitudes toward death and in end-of-life decision making. METHODS: Eight focus groups were convened in rural and urban Minnesota nursing homes. The 38 focus group participants were family members of nursing home residents with severe cognitive impairment. FINDINGS: Most rural focus group participants voiced unqualified acceptance of death and placed few conditions on death, beyond their hope that it would be quick and peaceful. Urban respondents presented a wider range of attitudes toward death, from unambiguous acceptance of immediate death to evident discomfort with welcoming death under any circumstances. These rural-urban differences had practical implications. Rural respondents were much less likely to endorse interventions that would impede death, compared to their urban counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Rural respondents tended to express confidence in natural forces; death was seen as neutral or beneficent. Resistance to the approach of death was more characteristic of urban respondents, some of whom insisted upon aggressive medical care in advanced dementia.
CONTEXT: Research has demonstrated substantial differences between end-of-life care in rural and urban settings. As the end of life approaches, rural elders are less likely to be hospitalized, to be placed in an intensive care unit, or to have a feeding tube, compared to their urban counterparts. These differences cannot be fully explained by rural-urban differences in access to medical services. PURPOSE: To describe and understand rural-urban differences in attitudes toward death and in end-of-life decision making. METHODS: Eight focus groups were convened in rural and urban Minnesota nursing homes. The 38 focus group participants were family members of nursing home residents with severe cognitive impairment. FINDINGS: Most rural focus group participants voiced unqualified acceptance of death and placed few conditions on death, beyond their hope that it would be quick and peaceful. Urban respondents presented a wider range of attitudes toward death, from unambiguous acceptance of immediate death to evident discomfort with welcoming death under any circumstances. These rural-urban differences had practical implications. Rural respondents were much less likely to endorse interventions that would impede death, compared to their urban counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Rural respondents tended to express confidence in natural forces; death was seen as neutral or beneficent. Resistance to the approach of death was more characteristic of urban respondents, some of whom insisted upon aggressive medical care in advanced dementia.
Authors: Cari Levy; Mary Ersek; Winifred Scott; Joan G Carpenter; Jennifer Kononowech; Ciaran Phibbs; Jill Lowry; Jennifer Cohen; Marybeth Foglia Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Charles Gessert; Stephen Waring; Lisa Bailey-Davis; Pat Conway; Melissa Roberts; Jeffrey VanWormer Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Andrea Gruneir; Susan E Bronskill; Alice Newman; Chaim M Bell; Peter Gozdyra; Geoffrey M Anderson; Paula A Rochon Journal: Healthc Policy Date: 2016-11