Literature DB >> 16441191

An oblique effect for local motion: psychophysics and natural movie statistics.

Steven C Dakin1, Isabelle Mareschal, Peter J Bex.   

Abstract

Human perception of visual motion is thought to involve two stages--estimation of local motion (i.e., of small features) and global motion (i.e., of larger objects)--identified with cortical areas V1 and MT, respectively. We asked if poor discrimination of oblique compared to cardinal directions (the oblique effect for motion; OEM) reflects a deficit in local or in global motion processing. We used an equivalent noise (EN) paradigm--where one measures direction discrimination thresholds in the presence of directional variability--to quantify local and global limits. We report that the OEM diminishes with increasing directional variability, indicating that global motion processing (the number of local motion signals pooled) is equal across all directions and that the OEM is attributable to anisotropies in local motion processing. To investigate the origin of this effect, we measured local motion statistics from natural movies (filmed from the point of view of a walking observer). This analysis reveals that the distribution of local directional energy on the oblique directions tends to be broader, and frequently more asymmetric, than on the cardinal directions. If motion detectors are optimized to deal with our visual world then such anisotropies likely explain the local nature of the OEM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16441191     DOI: 10.1167/5.10.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  11 in total

1.  Stereoacuity in the periphery is limited by internal noise.

Authors:  Susan G Wardle; Peter J Bex; John Cass; David Alais
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Local motion processing limits fine direction discrimination in the periphery.

Authors:  Isabelle Mareschal; Peter J Bex; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Can speed be judged independent of direction?

Authors:  Catherine Manning; Rory Trevelyan Thomas; Oliver Braddick
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Quantifying "the aperture problem" for judgments of motion direction in natural scenes.

Authors:  David Kane; Peter Bex; Steven Dakin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Gravity estimation and verticality perception.

Authors:  Christopher J Dakin; Ari Rosenberg
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

6.  Effects of gestational length, gender, postnatal age, and birth order on visual contrast sensitivity in infants.

Authors:  Karen R Dobkins; Rain G Bosworth; Joseph P McCleery
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Illusory movement of stationary stimuli in the visual periphery: evidence for a strong centrifugal prior in motion processing.

Authors:  Ruyuan Zhang; Oh-Sang Kwon; Duje Tadin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Individuals with autism spectrum disorder have altered visual encoding capacity.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Noel; Ling-Qi Zhang; Alan A Stocker; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Active gaze control improves optic flow-based segmentation and steering.

Authors:  Florian Raudies; Ennio Mingolla; Heiko Neumann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How language production shapes language form and comprehension.

Authors:  Maryellen C Macdonald
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.