Literature DB >> 16440531

Effects of rupatadine vs placebo on allergen-induced symptoms in patients exposed to aeroallergens in the Vienna Challenge Chamber.

Petra Stuebner1, Friedrich Horak, René Zieglmayer, Eva Arnáiz, Chiara Leuratti, Iñaki Pérez, Iñaki Izquierdo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rupatadine is a novel compound with potent dual antihistamine and platelet-activating factor antagonist activities and no sedative effects.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of rupatadine, 10 mg once daily, and placebo on allergen-induced symptoms (including nasal congestion), nasal airflow, nasal secretion, and subjective tolerability in response to grass pollen in a controlled allergen-exposure chamber.
METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial, 45 patients with a history of seasonal allergic rhinitis received rupatadine or placebo every morning for 8 days in 2 different periods separated by a 14-day washout interval. On day 8 of each crossover period, patients underwent a 6-hour allergen exposure in the Vienna Challenge Chamber, where a constant and homogeneous concentration of aeroallergens was maintained. Subjective and objective assessments were performed online during the exposure.
RESULTS: Subjective single and composite nasal and nonnasal symptoms were consistently less severe with rupatadine use than with placebo use starting from the first evaluation at 15 minutes to the end of the 6-hour Vienna Challenge Chamber challenge, with the most significant effects seen for nasal rhinorrhea, nasal itching, sneezing attacks, and total nasal symptoms (P < .001 for all). All the other symptoms (including nasal congestion, P < or = .005) were also significantly reduced with active treatment compared with placebo use. Mean secretion weights and overall feeling of complaint were significantly lower with rupatadine therapy than with placebo use (P < or = .001). Overall, rupatadine treatment was well tolerated.
CONCLUSION: Rupatadine treatment is effective and well tolerated in patients with allergen-induced symptoms exposed to aeroallergens in a controlled exposure chamber.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16440531     DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61038-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol        ISSN: 1081-1206            Impact factor:   6.347


  9 in total

Review 1.  Controlled Allergen Challenge Facilities and Their Unique Contributions to Allergic Rhinitis Research.

Authors:  Michelle L North; Mena Soliman; Terry Walker; Lisa M Steacy; Anne K Ellis
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Rupatadine: a review of its use in the management of allergic disorders.

Authors:  Susan J Keam; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  The effects of bilastine compared with cetirizine, fexofenadine, and placebo on allergen-induced nasal and ocular symptoms in patients exposed to aeroallergen in the Vienna Challenge Chamber.

Authors:  Friedrich Horak; Petra Zieglmayer; René Zieglmayer; Patrick Lemell
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 4.575

4.  Rupatadine: pharmacological profile and its use in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  M Sudhakara Rao; D Dwarakanatha Reddy; P S N Murthy
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-01-09

5.  Rupatadine inhibits proinflammatory mediator secretion from human mast cells triggered by different stimuli.

Authors:  Magdalini Vasiadi; Dimitris Kalogeromitros; Duraisamy Kempuraj; Anthony Clemons; Bodi Zhang; Caterina Chliva; Michael Makris; Adam Wolfberg; Michael House; Theoharis C Theoharides
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 2.749

6.  Antihistaminic effects of rupatadine and PKPD modelling.

Authors:  Juana Peña; Marcel Li Carbo; Anna Solans; Teresa Nadal; Iñaki Izquierdo; Manuel Merlos
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.441

7.  Morning and evening efficacy evaluation of rupatadine (10 and 20 mg), compared with cetirizine 10 mg in perennial allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Farid Marmouz; Josep Giralt; Iñaki Izquierdo
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2011-04-14

Review 8.  Rupatadine: efficacy and safety of a non-sedating antihistamine with PAF-antagonist effects.

Authors:  Soja Shamizadeh; Knut Brockow; Johannes Ring
Journal:  Allergo J Int       Date:  2014-05-09

9.  Clinically relevant effect of rupatadine 20 mg and 10 mg in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pooled responder analysis.

Authors:  Joaquim Mullol; Iñaki Izquierdo; Kimihiro Okubo; Giorgio Walter Canonica; Jean Bousquet; Antonio Valero
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 5.871

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.