Literature DB >> 16440191

[Comparison of unidimensional and bidimensional measurement to assess therapeutic response in the treatment of solid tumors].

E A M Hauth1, J Stattaus, M Forsting.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this prospective study we applied both the bidimensional WHO method and the unidimensional RECIST method in treatment follow-up of solid tumors.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Computed tomography was performed in 80 patients before and after one chemotherapy cycle: 20 patients each with lung cancer, lymphoma, and metastases of the lung and the liver. In 207 tumor lesions unidimensional and bidimensional measurements were performed: 36 lesions of lung cancer, 51 lesions of lymphoma, and 60 lesions of metastases of the lung and the liver, respectively. We assigned the results to the corresponding response categories.
RESULTS: For tumor assessment, the kappa statistic produced a high agreement of 0.94 between the two methods for assessment of therapeutic response.
CONCLUSION: The unidimensional RECIST measurement is easier to perform in order to assess tumor size during treatment follow-up in oncologic radiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 16440191     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-005-1329-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  12 in total

1.  Re: Measure once or twice--does it really matter?

Authors:  K James; E Eisenhauer; P Therasse
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Will there be resistance to the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors)?

Authors:  E A Gehan; M C Tefft
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  How reliable are tumor measurements?

Authors:  J Gurland; R O Johnson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1965-11-29       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  CT assessment of tumour response to treatment: comparison of linear, cross-sectional and volumetric measures of tumour size.

Authors:  S A Sohaib; B Turner; J A Hanson; M Farquharson; R T Oliver; R H Reznek
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Assessment of lung cancer response after nonoperative therapy: tumor diameter, bidimensional product, and volume. A serial CT scan-based study.

Authors:  M Werner-Wasik; Y Xiao; E Pequignot; W J Curran; W Hauck
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Body CT and oncologic imaging.

Authors:  K D Hopper; K Singapuri; A Finkel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Reporting results of cancer treatment.

Authors:  A B Miller; B Hoogstraten; M Staquet; A Winkler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Studies in variation associated with the measurement of solid tumors.

Authors:  P T Lavin; G Flowerdew
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Radiological measurement of breast cancer metastases to lung and liver: comparison between WHO (bidimensional) and RECIST (unidimensional) guidelines.

Authors:  Srinivasa R Prasad; Sanjay Saini; James E Sumner; Peter F Hahn; Dushyant Sahani; Giles W Boland
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of 1-, 2-, and 3-Dimensional Tumor Response Assessment After Neoadjuvant GTX-RT in Borderline-Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Michael D Chuong; Tom J Hayman; Manish R Patel; Mark S Russell; Mokenge P Malafa; Pamela J Hodul; Gregory M Springett; Junsung Choi; Ravi Shridhar; Sarah E Hoffe
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2011-07

Review 2.  [Cellular mechanisms of tumor response: clinical demands].

Authors:  M-K Ganten; M A Weber; T M Ganten
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Prognostic value of different CT measurements in early therapy response evaluation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M W Huellner; T P Hennedige; R Winterhalder; T Zander; S K Venkatesh; W P Yong; R A Soo; B Seifert; T C Treumann; K Strobel; P Veit-Haibach
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.909

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.