Literature DB >> 16436852

Reduction of verbal pain scores after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 2-day continuous femoral nerve block: a randomized clinical trial.

Brian A Williams1, Michael L Kentor, Molly T Vogt, James J Irrgang, Matthew T Bottegal, Robin V West, Christopher D Harner, Freddie H Fu, John P Williams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-injection femoral nerve block analgesia and spinal anesthesia have been associated with fewer postoperative nursing interventions and successful same-day discharge after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. In the current study, the authors prospectively determined the effect of continuous femoral nerve block on a numeric rating scale (NRS) of pain intensity with movement for 7 postoperative days.
METHODS: Patients undergoing this surgery with no history of previous invasive surgery on the same knee were recruited for this study. After standardized spinal anesthesia, intravenous sedation, and perioperative multimodal analgesia, patients received a femoral nerve catheter with (1) saline bolus (30 ml) plus saline infusion (270 ml at 5 ml/h, placebo group); (2) levobupivacaine (0.25%) bolus with saline infusion (group I), or (3) levobupivacaine (0.25%) bolus and infusion (group II). Patients were surveyed preoperatively and on postoperative days 1-4 and 7 to determine NRS scores (scale 0-10).
RESULTS: Data from 233 participants were analyzed. On days 1-2, 50% of placebo patients had NRS scores of 5 or above, whereas among group II patients, only 25% had scores of 5 or above (P < 0.001). In regression models for NRS scores during days 1-4, group II was the only factor predicting lower pain scores (odds ratios, 0.3-0.5; P = 0.001-0.03). Overall, patients with preoperative NRS scores greater than 2 were likely to report higher NRS scores during days 1-7 (odds ratios, 3.3-5.2; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Femoral nerve block catheters reliably keep NRS scores below the moderate-to-severe pain threshold for the first 4 days after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16436852     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200602000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  20 in total

1.  Ultrasound evaluation of the anatomy of the vessels in relation to the femoral nerve at the femoral crease.

Authors:  W Ty Muhly; W Ty Muhly; Steven L Orebaugh
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-12-05       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Conflicting results in clinical research: is the proof in the P value, the study design, or the pudding?

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Edward R Mariano; Joseph M Neal
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.288

Review 3.  WITHDRAWN: Peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative pain after major knee surgery.

Authors:  Jin Xu; Xue-Mei Chen; Chenkai Ma; Xiang-Rui Wang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-08-06

Review 4.  Falls and major orthopaedic surgery with peripheral nerve blockade: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R L Johnson; S L Kopp; J R Hebl; P J Erwin; C B Mantilla
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 5.  Levobupivacaine: a review of its use in regional anaesthesia and pain management.

Authors:  Mark Sanford; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Long-term pain, stiffness, and functional disability after total knee arthroplasty with and without an extended ambulatory continuous femoral nerve block: a prospective, 1-year follow-up of a multicenter, randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Jonathan J Shuster; Douglas W Theriaque; Edward R Mariano; Paul J Girard; Vanessa J Loland; Scott Meyer; John F Donovan; George A Pugh; Linda T Le; Daniel I Sessler; Scott T Ball
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

7.  [Levobupivacaine vs. ropivacaine for continuous femoral analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Authors:  M Schuster; L Engelhardt; W Erler; B Dienert; M Wagner; J Birnbaum; T Volk
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  The efficacy comparison of on-demand boluses with and without basal infusion of 0.1 % bupivacaine via perineural femoral catheter after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Saule Svediene; Audrius Andrijauskas; Juozas Ivaskevicius; Andrius Saikus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  General health and knee function outcomes from 7 days to 12 weeks after spinal anesthesia and multimodal analgesia for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian A Williams; Qainyu Dang; James E Bost; James J Irrgang; Steven L Orebaugh; Matthew T Bottegal; Michael L Kentor
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 10.  Regional anesthesia at home.

Authors:  Gloria S Cheng; Lynna P Choy; Brian M Ilfeld
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.706

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.