Literature DB >> 16436843

QT interval measurement: evaluation of automatic QTc measurement and new simple method to calculate and interpret corrected QT interval.

Beny Charbit1, Emmanuel Samain, Paul Merckx, Christian Funck-Brentano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessment of repolarization duration is often recommended to avoid administration of QT-prolonging drugs in patients with prolonged QTc interval, a frequent situation in the postoperative period. Bazett QT correction inappropriately increases QTc when heart rate is increased, and the use of the Fridericia formula may avoid a falsely prolonged QTc interval. The authors assessed automatic QT interval measurement to detect prolonged QTc interval (women >450 ms; men >440 ms) in the postoperative setting.
METHODS: Automatic and manual electrocardiograms were performed in 108 patients after anesthesia. Automatic electrocardiographic measurement used the Bazett formula. Manual measurements were made from each electrocardiogram and used as the reference. Agreement between the two methods was analyzed. Bazett and Fridericia QT corrections were compared in this population.
RESULTS: Agreement between automatic and manual measurements was low. The Fridericia correction, but not the Bazett correction, was independent from heart rate and allowed adequate QT correction. Sensitivity of automatic measurements to detect prolonged QTc-Bazett interval was 54%. Automatic QTc-Bazett interval less than 430 ms ruled out a manual prolonged QTc interval. When automatic QTc-Bazett was greater than 430 ms, this value was converted according to Fridericia. Automatic QTc-Fridericia greater than 430 ms identified all patients with prolonged manual QTc with a negative predictive error of 0% (95% confidence interval, 0-7%). QTc-Fridericia can be approximated by respectively adding or subtracting 5% to the uncorrected QT for each increase or decrease by 10 beats/min in heart rate from 60 beats/min.
CONCLUSIONS: Automatic QTc-Bazett measurement, if abnormal, associated with calculation of QTc-Fridericia reliably identifies patients in whom manual QTc measurement must be performed to confirm postoperative prolonged QTc interval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16436843     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200602000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  21 in total

1.  [Perioperative monitoring of the QT interval].

Authors:  H Pfizenmayer; P Friederich
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  The terminal part of the QT interval (T peak to T end): a predictor of mortality after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gunnar Erikssen; Knut Liestøl; Lars Gullestad; Kristina H Haugaa; Bjørn Bendz; Jan P Amlie
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Automated versus manual measurement of the QT interval and corrected QT interval.

Authors:  Yuji Kasamaki; Yukio Ozawa; Masakatsu Ohta; Akira Sezai; Takashi Yamaki; Mutsuo Kaneko; Ichiro Watanabe; Atsushi Hirayama; Tomohiro Nakayama
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Assessment of total cardiac repolarization's spatial distribution among patients with aortic sclerosis.

Authors:  Oguzhan Ekrem Turan; Mustafa Ozturk; Abdulselam Ilter; Mustafa Inc; Kayihan Karaman; Gulhanim Kiris; Merih Kutlu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

5.  A novel ECG-index for prediction of ventricular arrhythmias in patients after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mathias Hetland; Kristina H Haugaa; Sebastian I Sarvari; Gunnar Erikssen; Erik Kongsgaard; Thor Edvardsen
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  QTc interval and neurological outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Taiga Ichinomiya; Yoshiaki Terao; Kosuke Miura; Ushio Higashijima; Tomomi Tanise; Makoto Fukusaki; Koji Sumikawa
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Differential effects of propofol and sevoflurane on QT interval during anesthetic induction.

Authors:  Makito Oji; Yoshiaki Terao; Tomomi Toyoda; Tomoyuki Kuriyama; Kosuke Miura; Makoto Fukusaki; Koji Sumikawa
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  The effects of intravenous anesthetics on QT interval during anesthetic induction with sevoflurane.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Terao; Ushio Higashijima; Tomomi Toyoda; Taiga Ichinomiya; Makoto Fukusaki; Tetsuya Hara
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Heart-rate-corrected QT interval evolution in premature infants during the first week of life.

Authors:  Timothy J B Ulrich; Marc A Ellsworth; William A Carey; Adeel S Zubair; Brianna C MacQueen; Christopher E Colby; Michael J Ackerman
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 1.655

10.  The interaction of antiemetic dose of droperidol with propofol on QT interval during anesthetic induction.

Authors:  Tomomi Toyoda; Yoshiaki Terao; Makito Oji; Mai Okada; Makoto Fukusaki; Koji Sumikawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.