Literature DB >> 16436479

Electrical stimulation of mammalian retinal ganglion cells with multielectrode arrays.

Chris Sekirnjak1, Pawel Hottowy, Alexander Sher, Wladyslaw Dabrowski, A M Litke, E J Chichilnisky.   

Abstract

Existing epiretinal implants for the blind are designed to electrically stimulate large groups of surviving retinal neurons using a small number of electrodes with diameters of several hundred micrometers. To increase the spatial resolution of artificial sight, electrodes much smaller than those currently in use are desirable. In this study, we stimulated and recorded ganglion cells in isolated pieces of rat, guinea pig, and monkey retina. We used microfabricated hexagonal arrays of 61 platinum disk electrodes with diameters between 6 and 25 microm, spaced 60 microm apart. Charge-balanced current pulses evoked one or two spikes at latencies as short as 0.2 ms, and typically only one or a few recorded ganglion cells were stimulated. Application of several synaptic blockers did not abolish the evoked responses, implying direct activation of ganglion cells. Threshold charge densities were typically <0.1 mC/cm2 for a pulse duration of 100 micros, corresponding to charge thresholds of <100 pC. Stimulation remained effective after several hours and at high frequencies. To show that closely spaced electrodes can elicit independent ganglion cell responses, we used the multielectrode array to stimulate several nearby ganglion cells simultaneously. From these data, we conclude that electrical stimulation of mammalian retina with small-diameter electrode arrays is achievable and can provide high temporal and spatial precision at low charge densities. We review previous epiretinal stimulation studies and discuss our results in the context of 32 other publications, comparing threshold parameters and safety limits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16436479     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01168.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  93 in total

1.  The effect of waveform asymmetry on perception with epiretinal prostheses.

Authors:  Dorsa Haji Ghaffari; Kathleen E Finn; V Swetha E Jeganathan; Uday Patel; Varalakshmi Wuyyuru; Arup Roy; James D Weiland
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Resolution of the epiretinal prosthesis is not limited by electrode size.

Authors:  Matthew R Behrend; Ashish K Ahuja; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 3.  Somatic treatments for mood disorders.

Authors:  Moacyr A Rosa; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Selective activation of neuronal targets with sinusoidal electric stimulation.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Donald K Eddington; Joseph F Rizzo; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Strength-duration relationship for extracellular neural stimulation: numerical and analytical models.

Authors:  David Boinagrov; Jim Loudin; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Contrast Sensitivity With a Subretinal Prosthesis and Implications for Efficient Delivery of Visual Information.

Authors:  Georges Goetz; Richard Smith; Xin Lei; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore Kamins; Keith Mathieson; Alexander Sher; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Neural responses elicited by electrical stimulation of the retina.

Authors:  Shih-Jen Chen; Manjunatha Mahadevappa; Roberto Roizenblatt; James Weiland; Mark Humayun
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2006

8.  Autophosphorylated CaMKII Facilitates Spike Propagation in Rat Optic Nerve.

Authors:  Gloria J Partida; Anna Fasoli; Alex Fogli Iseppe; Genki Ogata; Jeffrey S Johnson; Vithya Thambiaiyah; Christopher L Passaglia; Andrew T Ishida
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Brightness as a function of current amplitude in human retinal electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Scott H Greenwald; Alan Horsager; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; Matthew J McMahon; Ione Fine
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Electrically-evoked Neural Activities of rd1 Mice Retinal Ganglion Cells by Repetitive Pulse Stimulation.

Authors:  Sang Baek Ryu; Jang Hee Ye; Jong Seung Lee; Yong Sook Goo; Chi Hyun Kim; Kyung Hwan Kim
Journal:  Korean J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 2.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.