Literature DB >> 16435882

On the correlation between hydrophobicity, liposome binding and cellular uptake of porphyrin sensitizers.

Shimshon Ben-Dror1, Irena Bronshtein, Arno Wiehe, Beate Röder, Mathias O Senge, Benjamin Ehrenberg.   

Abstract

A crucial factor in choosing a porphyrin or analogous photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy (PDT) is its ability to incorporate into the cells. For hydrophobic compounds that partition passively into the cytoplasmic membrane, a partition coefficient between an organic solvent and water, P, is one factor that could be used to predict the molecule's ability to diffuse into biomembranes. We synthesized several porphyrins, modified with two, three or four meso-substituents and studied their spectroscopic and photophysical properties. The octanol-water partitioning coefficients, log P, were calculated as a parameter for hydrophobicity. We found these porphyrins to be very hydrophobic, with log P values in the range of 8.9-11.8. These were correlated with the binding constants of these porphyrins into liposomes, K(b), as well as to their uptake by cells. The correlation between the estimated log P and K(b) is nearly linear but negative, indicating, apparently, that there is lesser binding to liposomes with increased hydrophobicity. On the other hand, all of the studied porphyrins are taken up by cells, but there is no clear correlation between cellular uptake and the log P or K(b). Lipinski's pharmacological "rule of 5" predicts poor permeation of drugs into cells when log P is greater than five. This may be relevant for diffusional binding to liposomes, where aqueous aggregation can interfere strongly with cellular uptake. In such extreme conditions, neither liposome binding nor other rules seem to predict porphyrin behavior in vitro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16435882     DOI: 10.1562/2005-09-01-RA-669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photochem Photobiol        ISSN: 0031-8655            Impact factor:   3.421


  17 in total

Review 1.  Structural and physico-chemical determinants of the interactions of macrocyclic photosensitizers with cells.

Authors:  Halina Mojzisova; Stéphanie Bonneau; Daniel Brault
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 1.733

2.  A hand-held fiber-optic implement for the site-specific delivery of photosensitizer and singlet oxygen.

Authors:  Adaickapillai Mahendran; Yasemin Kopkalli; Goutam Ghosh; Ashwini Ghogare; Mihaela Minnis; Bonnie I Kruft; Matibur Zamadar; David Aebisher; Lesley Davenport; Alexander Greer
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.421

3.  Impacting Pancreatic Cancer Therapy in Heterotypic in Vitro Organoids and in Vivo Tumors with Specificity-Tuned, NIR-Activable Photoimmunonanoconjugates: Towards Conquering Desmoplasia?

Authors:  Girgis Obaid; Shazia Bano; Srivalleesha Mallidi; Mans Broekgaarden; Jerrin Kuriakose; Zachary Silber; Anne-Laure Bulin; Yucheng Wang; Zhiming Mai; Wendong Jin; Diane Simeone; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 11.189

4.  Fluorine end-capped optical fibers for photosensitizer release and singlet oxygen production.

Authors:  Dorota Bartusik; David Aebisher; Goutam Ghosh; Mihaela Minnis; Alexander Greer
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 4.354

5.  The synthesis of new potential photosensitizers. 1. Mono-carboxylic acid derivatives of tetraphenylporphyrin.

Authors:  Grzegorz Zięba; Marcin Rojkiewicz; Violetta Kozik; Krystyna Jarzembek; Anna Jarczyk; Aleksander Sochanik; Piotr Kuś
Journal:  Monatsh Chem       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 1.451

Review 6.  Porphyrin-based cationic amphiphilic photosensitisers as potential anticancer, antimicrobial and immunosuppressive agents.

Authors:  Nela Malatesti; Ivana Munitic; Igor Jurak
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2017-03-24

7.  A/C magnetic hyperthermia of melanoma mediated by iron(0)/iron oxide core/shell magnetic nanoparticles: a mouse study.

Authors:  Sivasai Balivada; Raja Shekar Rachakatla; Hongwang Wang; Thilani N Samarakoon; Raj Kumar Dani; Marla Pyle; Franklin O Kroh; Brandon Walker; Xiaoxuan Leaym; Olga B Koper; Masaaki Tamura; Viktor Chikan; Stefan H Bossmann; Deryl L Troyer
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Heptamethine cyanine based (64)Cu-PET probe PC-1001 for cancer imaging: synthesis and in vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Li Xiao; Yi Zhang; Wei Yue; Xiuzhen Xie; Ji-Ping Wang; Mahendra D Chordia; Leland W K Chung; Dongfeng Pan
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.408

9.  Fluorinated Photodynamic Therapy Device Tips and their Resistance to Fouling for In Vivo Sensitizer Release.

Authors:  Ashwini A Ghogare; Joann M Miller; Bikash Mondal; Alan M Lyons; Keith A Cengel; Theresa M Busch; Alexander Greer
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.421

10.  Interaction of cationic meso-porphyrins with liposomes, mitochondria and erythrocytes.

Authors:  Fabio M Engelmann; Ildemar Mayer; Dino S Gabrielli; Henrique E Toma; Alicia J Kowaltowski; Koiti Araki; Mauricio S Baptista
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 3.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.