Literature DB >> 16435173

The knowledge gap in expanded newborn screening: survey results from paediatricians in Massachusetts.

M Gennaccaro1, S E Waisbren, D Marsden.   

Abstract

Massachusetts currently offers an optional expanded newborn screening programme that tests for 20 biochemical genetic disorders in addition to the mandated newborn screening tests, including phenylketonuria (PKU) and nine other biochemical genetic disorders. We conducted a mail survey of 550 paediatricians listed in the 2000 Massachusetts Healthcare Directory to determine paediatricians' preparedness in discussing expanded newborn screening and its results with families, and to determine in what specific format physicians in Massachusetts would prefer to receive educational materials and updates. Of surveys mailed, 35% (190/550) were returned within the allotted 3 weeks: 25 paediatricians (14%) were unaware of expanded newborn screening; 78 respondents (42%) indicated feeling less than prepared talking about test results with families; 100 paediatricians (54%) indicated a lack of information about metabolic disorders; 134 (73%) preferred information sent in postal mailings, 62 (34%) preferred grand rounds, 60 (33%) preferred educational seminars, and 58 (32%) preferred websites. Other formats receiving preferences of less than 30% included e-mail (27%), phone calls (8%), video (6%), and distance learning (1%). Paediatricians are ill-prepared for expanded newborn screening for biochemical genetic disorders. To address this problem, paediatricians in Massachusetts indicated a preference for unsolicited periodic mailings including short reviews and brochures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16435173     DOI: 10.1007/s10545-005-0135-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis        ISSN: 0141-8955            Impact factor:   4.750


  9 in total

Review 1.  Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature.

Authors:  S E Kellerman; J Herold
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 2.  Neonatal screening: ethical aspects.

Authors:  G Hermerén
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Suppl       Date:  1999-12

3.  Newborn screening: A blueprint for the future executive summary: newborn screening task force report

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  Current issues of personnel and laboratory practices in genetic testing.

Authors:  H F Mark; T Kelly; M S Watson; G Hoeltge; W A Miller; L Beauregard
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Survey of pediatrician practices in retrieving statewide authorized newborn screening results.

Authors:  F Desposito; M A Lloyd-Puryear; T F Tonniges; F Rhein; M Mann
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Tandem mass spectrometric analysis for amino, organic, and fatty acid disorders in newborn dried blood spots: a two-year summary from the New England Newborn Screening Program.

Authors:  T H Zytkovicz; E F Fitzgerald; D Marsden; C A Larson; V E Shih; D M Johnson; A W Strauss; A M Comeau; R B Eaton; G F Grady
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Genetic counseling and risk communication services of newborn screening programs.

Authors:  M Farrell; L Certain; P Farrell
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2001-02

Review 8.  Selective screening for inborn errors of metabolism--past, present and future.

Authors:  G F Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.183

9.  Effect of expanded newborn screening for biochemical genetic disorders on child outcomes and parental stress.

Authors:  Susan E Waisbren; Simone Albers; Steve Amato; Mary Ampola; Thomas G Brewster; Laurie Demmer; Roger B Eaton; Robert Greenstein; Mark Korson; Cecilia Larson; Deborah Marsden; Michael Msall; Edwin W Naylor; Siegfried Pueschel; Margretta Seashore; Vivian E Shih; Harvey L Levy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 56.272

  9 in total
  13 in total

1.  Neonatal screening: from the 'Guthrie age' to the 'genetic age'.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Dhondt
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2007-05-12       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 2.  Newborn screening and renal disease: where we have been; where we are now; where we are going.

Authors:  J Lawrence Merritt; David Askenazi; Si Houn Hahn
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 3.  A review of the psychosocial effects of false-positive results on parents and current communication practices in newborn screening.

Authors:  J Hewlett; S E Waisbren
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 4.982

4.  Primary care providers' role in newborn screening result notification for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; Carolyn J Barg; Yvonne Bombard; Pranesh Chakraborty; Beth K Potter; Sarah Patton; Jessica Peace Bytautas; Karen Tam; Louise Taylor; Elizabeth Kerr; Christine Davies; Jennifer Milburn; Felix Ratjen; Astrid Guttmann; June C Carroll
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Effectiveness of an online curriculum for medical students on genetics, genetic testing and counseling.

Authors:  Mary P Metcalf; T Bradley Tanner; Amanda Buchanan
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2010-01-29

6.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: Role of primary care providers in caring for infants with positive screening results.

Authors:  June C Carroll; Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; Carolyn J Barg; Yvonne Bombard; Pranesh Chakraborty; Beth K Potter; Jessica Peace Bytautas; Karen Tam; Louise Taylor; Elizabeth Kerr; Christine Davies; Jennifer Milburn; Felix Ratjen; Astrid Guttmann
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Maternal knowledge and attitudes about newborn screening for sickle cell disease and cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Colleen Walsh Lang; Alex P Stark; Kruti Acharya; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Informing parents about positive newborn screen results: parents' recommendations.

Authors:  Natalie Salm; Elena Yetter; Audrey Tluczek
Journal:  J Child Health Care       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 1.979

9.  Primary care providers' experiences notifying parents of cystic fibrosis newborn screening results.

Authors:  Caitlin Finan; Samya Z Nasr; Erin Rothwell; Beth A Tarini
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 1.168

10.  Impact of false-positive newborn metabolic screening results on early health care utilization.

Authors:  Ellen A Lipstein; James M Perrin; Susan E Waisbren; Lisa A Prosser
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.