Literature DB >> 16434942

Crossectomy and great saphenous vein stripping.

R J Winterborn1, J J Earnshaw.   

Abstract

Crossectomy and stripping have been the standard of care for primary great saphenous varicose veins since the high failure rates of sclerotherapy became apparent in the 1970s. As the specialty of venous surgery has evolved, a number of clinical trials have established the optimal methods of surgical treatment, and the clinical benefit of routine stripping. Long-term trials, however, have uncovered a high recurrence rate after varicose vein surgery that approaches 70% after 10 years. There is much debate about whether this is the result of the dilatation of existing tributaries in the groin or the growth of new veins as a result of angiogenesis that follows surgical treatment and healing (neovascularisation). The addition of barrier technology to current crossectomy has the potential to improve the results of surgery in the future. In the meanwhile, new techniques are evolving to obliterate the great saphenous vein, including endovenous laser, radiofrequency ablation and foam sclerotherapy. Randomised clinical trials are urgently required to compare these new treatments against standard surgery, and they will need to focus on whether the short-term gains in reduced convalescence and morbidity are balanced by durable long-term results.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16434942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)        ISSN: 0021-9509            Impact factor:   1.888


  7 in total

Review 1.  Significance of Reflux Abolition at the Saphenofemoral Junction in Connection with Stripping and Ablative Methods.

Authors:  Cestmir Recek
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2015-03-23

2.  Advances in the treatment of superficial venous insufficiency of the lower extremities.

Authors:  Lonnie L Whiddon
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2007-04

3.  Saphenous vein stripping surgical technique and frequency of saphenous nerve injury.

Authors:  Aleksandra Jaworucka-Kaczorowska; Grzegorz Oszkinis; Juliusz Huber; Agnieszka Wiertel-Krawczuk; Elżbieta Gabor; Paweł Kaczorowski
Journal:  Phlebology       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 1.740

4.  Conventional versus invaginated stripping of the great saphenous vein: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Marc R Scheltinga; Edwin R Wijburg; Bram J Keulers; Karin E de Kroon
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Tumescentless endovenous radiofrequency ablation with local hypothermia and compression technique.

Authors:  Kemal Korkmaz; Alı Ümit Yener; Hıkmet Selçuk Gedık; Alı Baran Budak; Özlem Yener; Serhat Bahadir Genç; Ayşe Lafçi
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.167

6.  Venous pseudoaneurysm of the great saphenous vein stump as late complication of flush saphenofemoral ligation and stripping.

Authors:  Maurizio Domanin; Riccardo Miloro; Silvia Romagnoli; Aldo Basellini
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2018-03-01

7.  Effectiveness of tumescent solution combined with negative pressure wound therapy in traditional high ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein.

Authors:  Feng Su; Liu Cheng; Qiao Tong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.