Literature DB >> 16434914

Development and validation of an index to predict activity of daily living dependence in community-dwelling elders.

Kenneth E Covinsky1, Joan Hilton, Karla Lindquist, R Adams Dudley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maintaining independence in daily functioning is an important health outcome in older adults. A key measure of functional independence in elders is the ability to do activities of daily living (ADL) without the assistance of another person. However, few prognostic indices have been developed that stratify elders into groups at variable risk for developing ADL dependence.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop and validate a prognostic index that distinguishes between elders at different risk of ADL dependence. RESEARCH DESIGN, SUBJECTS, AND MEASURES: We studied subjects enrolled in Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD), a nationally representative cohort of elders older than the age of 70. We included 5239 subjects (mean age, 77) reporting that they could do each of 5 ADL (bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, and eating) without the assistance of another person at baseline. Subjects were divided into development (n = 3245) and validation (n = 1994) samples based on region of the United States. Our primary outcome was the need for help (dependence) with at least one ADL at 2 years. We used logistic regression to select among predictor variables encompassing several domains: demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, functional status, cognitive status, and general health indicators.
RESULTS: The 9 independent predictors of 2-year ADL dependence were age older than 80, diabetes, difficulty walking several blocks, difficulty bathing or dressing, need for help with personal finances, difficulty lifting 10 pounds, inability to name the Vice President, history of falling, and low body mass index. We created a risk score by assigning 1 point to each risk factor. In the development sample, rates of 2-year ADL dependence in subjects with 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 or more risk factors were 1.3%, 2.8%, 3.8%, 10%, 22%, and 33%, respectively (P < 0.001, roc area = 0.79). In the validation sample, the rates were 0.7%, 4.3%, 8.7%, 11%, 18%, and 40% (P < 0.001, roc area = 0.77). The risk score also discriminated between subjects at variable risk for a combined outcome of either ADL decline or death (4.3%, 7.6%, 15%, 21%, 30%, and 47%).
CONCLUSION: Using data available from patient reports, we validated a simple risk index that distinguished between elders at variable risk of ADL dependence. This index may be useful for identifying elders at high risk of poor outcomes or for risk adjustment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16434914     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000196955.99704.64

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  29 in total

1.  Commentary on "Developing a national strategy to prevent dementia: Leon Thal Symposium 2009." Dementia risk indices: A framework for identifying individuals with a high dementia risk.

Authors:  Deborah E Barnes; Kenneth E Covinsky; Rachel A Whitmer; Lewis H Kuller; Oscar L Lopez; Kristine Yaffe
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 21.566

2.  Disability in the oldest-old: incidence and risk factors in the 90+ study.

Authors:  Daniel J Berlau; Maria M Corrada; Carrie B Peltz; Claudia H Kawas
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.105

3.  Functional Impairment: An Unmeasured Marker of Medicare Costs for Postacute Care of Older Adults.

Authors:  S Ryan Greysen; Irena Stijacic Cenzer; W John Boscardin; Kenneth E Covinsky
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Functional impairment and hospital readmission in Medicare seniors.

Authors:  S Ryan Greysen; Irena Stijacic Cenzer; Andrew D Auerbach; Kenneth E Covinsky
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Impairment in instrumental activities of daily living and the geriatric syndrome of self-neglect.

Authors:  Aanand D Naik; Jason Burnett; Sabrina Pickens-Pace; Carmel B Dyer
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2008-06

6.  At the tipping point: predicting severe mobility difficulty in vulnerable older women.

Authors:  Josette A Rivera; Linda P Fried; Carlos O Weiss; Eleanor M Simonsick
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Guiding principles for the care of older adults with multimorbidity: an approach for clinicians: American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy in older people with cancer.

Authors:  Justin P Turner; Sepehr Shakib; Nimit Singhal; Jonathon Hogan-Doran; Robert Prowse; Sally Johns; J Simon Bell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Improving the validity of activity of daily living dependency risk assessment.

Authors:  Daniel O Clark; Timothy E Stump; Wanzhu Tu; Douglas K Miller
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2013-01-17

10.  Variation in response to a home intervention to support daily function by age, race, sex, and education.

Authors:  Laura N Gitlin; Laraine Winter; Marie P Dennis; Walter W Hauck
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.053

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.