Literature DB >> 16431085

A minimal estimate for the gene content of the last universal common ancestor--exobiology from a terrestrial perspective.

Christos A Ouzounis1, Victor Kunin, Nikos Darzentas, Leon Goldovsky.   

Abstract

Using an algorithm for ancestral state inference of gene content, given a large number of extant genome sequences and a phylogenetic tree, we aim to reconstruct the gene content of the last universal common ancestor (LUCA), a hypothetical life form that presumably was the progenitor of the three domains of life. The method allows for gene loss, previously found to be a major factor in shaping gene content, and thus the estimate of LUCA's gene content appears to be substantially higher than that proposed previously, with a typical number of over 1000 gene families, of which more than 90% are also functionally characterized. More precisely, when only prokaryotes are considered, the number varies between 1006 and 1189 gene families while when eukaryotes are also included, this number increases to between 1344 and 1529 families depending on the underlying phylogenetic tree. Therefore, the common belief that the hypothetical genome of LUCA should resemble those of the smallest extant genomes of obligate parasites is not supported by recent advances in computational genomics. Instead, a fairly complex genome similar to those of free-living prokaryotes, with a variety of functional capabilities including metabolic transformation, information processing, membrane/transport proteins and complex regulation, shared between the three domains of life, emerges as the most likely progenitor of life on Earth, with profound repercussions for planetary exploration and exobiology.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16431085     DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Microbiol        ISSN: 0923-2508            Impact factor:   3.992


  56 in total

Review 1.  Divergence and convergence in enzyme evolution: parallel evolution of paraoxonases from quorum-quenching lactonases.

Authors:  Mikael Elias; Dan S Tawfik
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  2011 William Allan Award: development and evolution.

Authors:  John M Opitz
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Toward a systems biology perspective on enzyme evolution.

Authors:  Shelley D Copley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  The last universal common ancestor (LUCA) and the ancestors of archaea and bacteria were progenotes.

Authors:  Massimo Di Giulio
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 5.  Toward understanding protocell mechanosensation.

Authors:  Daniel Balleza
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 6.  The last universal common ancestor: emergence, constitution and genetic legacy of an elusive forerunner.

Authors:  Nicolas Glansdorff; Ying Xu; Bernard Labedan
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 4.540

7.  The conflict between horizontal gene transfer and the safeguard of identity: origin of meiotic sexuality.

Authors:  Nicolas Glansdorff; Ying Xu; Bernard Labedan
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Reconstructing ancestral gene content by coevolution.

Authors:  Tamir Tuller; Hadas Birin; Uri Gophna; Martin Kupiec; Eytan Ruppin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  The non-biological meaning of the term "prokaryote" and its implications.

Authors:  Massimo Di Giulio
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  The physiology and habitat of the last universal common ancestor.

Authors:  Madeline C Weiss; Filipa L Sousa; Natalia Mrnjavac; Sinje Neukirchen; Mayo Roettger; Shijulal Nelson-Sathi; William F Martin
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 17.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.