AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Insulin resistance is thought to be central to the pathogenesis of diabetic dyslipidaemia. We hypothesised that improving insulin sensitivity would improve fasting and postprandial triglyceride metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes. To this aim we studied fasting and postprandial lipaemia in type 2 diabetic patients before and after sensitisation to insulin withpioglitazone, compared with that observed in patients on an insulin-providing regime. METHODS: In a double-blind placebo-controlled protocol, 22 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly allocated to receive either pioglitazone (45 mg/day) or glibenclamide (5 mg/day), for a 20-week period. Fasting and postprandial lipid metabolism were investigated at baseline and at the end of the treatment period. A group of non-diabetic subjects was also studied. RESULTS: Compared with glibenclamide treatment, pioglitazone treatment decreased fasting triglyceride, glucose and insulin levels and the homeostasis model assessment score of insulin resistance. Decreased fasting triglyceride after pioglitazone treatment was due to reduced VLDL triglyceride, particularly VLDL-2. Lipoprotein lipase activity was unchanged by pioglitazone treatment but hepatic lipase showed a significant decrease. Pioglitazone treatment lowered total postprandial triglyceride, as well as chylomicron- and chylomicron-remnant retinyl palmitate levels to normal. Glucose disposal improved but remained abnormal. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Insulin sensitisation with pioglitazone has major effects in restoring postprandial lipaemia to normal, while also correcting fasting hypertriglyceridaemia; both factors may have consequences for atherogenic risk in diabetes.
RCT Entities:
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Insulin resistance is thought to be central to the pathogenesis of diabetic dyslipidaemia. We hypothesised that improving insulin sensitivity would improve fasting and postprandial triglyceride metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes. To this aim we studied fasting and postprandial lipaemia in type 2 diabeticpatients before and after sensitisation to insulin with pioglitazone, compared with that observed in patients on an insulin-providing regime. METHODS: In a double-blind placebo-controlled protocol, 22 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly allocated to receive either pioglitazone (45 mg/day) or glibenclamide (5 mg/day), for a 20-week period. Fasting and postprandial lipid metabolism were investigated at baseline and at the end of the treatment period. A group of non-diabetic subjects was also studied. RESULTS: Compared with glibenclamide treatment, pioglitazone treatment decreased fasting triglyceride, glucose and insulin levels and the homeostasis model assessment score of insulin resistance. Decreased fasting triglyceride after pioglitazone treatment was due to reduced VLDL triglyceride, particularly VLDL-2. Lipoprotein lipase activity was unchanged by pioglitazone treatment but hepatic lipase showed a significant decrease. Pioglitazone treatment lowered total postprandial triglyceride, as well as chylomicron- and chylomicron-remnant retinyl palmitate levels to normal. Glucose disposal improved but remained abnormal. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION:Insulin sensitisation with pioglitazone has major effects in restoring postprandial lipaemia to normal, while also correcting fasting hypertriglyceridaemia; both factors may have consequences for atherogenic risk in diabetes.
Authors: G D Tan; B A Fielding; J M Currie; S M Humphreys; M Désage; K N Frayn; M Laville; H Vidal; F Karpe Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2004-12-24 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: V Van Harmelen; S Reynisdottir; K Cianflone; E Degerman; J Hoffstedt; K Nilsell; A Sniderman; P Arner Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1999-06-25 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: K C Tan; M B Cooper; K L Ling; B A Griffin; D J Freeman; C J Packard; J Shepherd; C N Hales; D J Betteridge Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: N Matikainen; S Mänttäri; A Schweizer; A Ulvestad; D Mills; B E Dunning; J E Foley; M-R Taskinen Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2006-07-01 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: B Eliasson; D Möller-Goede; K Eeg-Olofsson; C Wilson; J Cederholm; P Fleck; M Diamant; M-R Taskinen; U Smith Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2012-01-12 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Erin R Rademacher; David R Jacobs; Antoinette Moran; Julia Steinberger; Ronald J Prineas; Alan Sinaiko Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 4.844