Literature DB >> 16428533

The size 1(1/2) ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway.

Kai Goldmann1, Christine Roettger, Hinnerk Wulf.   

Abstract

Many problems with the Classic laryngeal mask airway (CLMA) in infants are believed to be related to its inadequate cuff design. One of the main limitations of the CLMA is that the resulting low-pressure seal can be inadequate for positive pressure ventilation (PPV). The ProSeal LMA (PLMA), a new laryngeal mask airway with a modified cuff, has been shown to form a more effective seal than the CLMA in children. The first infant size PLMA, size 1(1/2), became available recently. We studied 30 anesthetized, nonparalyzed infants aged 15 mo (2-30 mo) and weighing 9 kg (5-12 kg). The CLMA and PLMA were inserted in random order into each patient. Airway leak pressure and maximum tidal volume were measured. Ease of insertion, quality of initial airway, and fiberoptic position were also determined. Gastric tube placement was assessed for the PLMA. The mean airway leak pressure in neutral head position (26.7 versus 18.9 cm H2O), maximum flexion (35.6 versus 28.2 cm H2O), and the mean maximum tidal volume (312 versus 260 mL) were significantly higher for the PLMA (P < 0.01). Air entered the stomach in eight patients with the CLMA but did not with the PLMA. Gastric tube placement was possible in all but one patient. In three patients, the use of the PLMA led to some degree of clinically relevant compression of the larynx. The size 1(1/2) PLMA seems to be a more suitable device for airway maintenance in infants than the same size CLMA. The ability to insert a gastric tube at the same time, and a significantly higher airway leak pressure than with the CLMA, may have important implications for its use for PPV in infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16428533     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000194300.56739.1a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of clinical performance of size 1.5 Supreme™ LMA and Proseal™ LMA among Asian children: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sook Hui Chaw; Ina I Shariffuddin; Li Lian Foo; Pui Kuan Lee; Ramona Maya Paran; Peak Chee Cheang; Lucy Chan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Randomized evaluation of the size 2 laryngeal tube and classical laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions in children under positive pressure ventilation.

Authors:  Andreas Biedler; Marc Wrobel; Sven Schneider; Stefan Soltész; Stephan Ziegeler; Ulrich Grundmann
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  [Clinical use of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask in infants, children and adolescents : prospective observational survey].

Authors:  K Goldmann; A Malik; C Hechtfischer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Comparing I-Gel to Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airways in Infants: A Prospective Randomised Clinical Study.

Authors:  Sibel Oba; Hacer Şebnem Türk; Leyla Kılınç; Birsen Ekşioğlu Karacı; Serkan İslamoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2019-11-25

5.  Size 2.5 ProSeal(™) LMA: Is it associated with increased attempts at insertion?

Authors:  Aparna Sinha; Bimla Sharma; Jayashree Sood
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2012-01

6.  Performance of size 1 I-gel compared with size 1 ProSeal laryngeal mask in anesthetized infants and neonates.

Authors:  Gulay Erdogan Kayhan; Zekine Begec; Mukadder Sanli; Ender Gedik; Mahmut Durmus
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-02-22

7.  Comparison of the Supreme™ and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airways in infants: a prospective randomised clinical study.

Authors:  Sibel Oba; Hacer Sebnem Turk; Canan Tulay Isil; Huseyin Erdogan; Pinar Sayin; Ali Ihsan Dokucu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Comparison of I-gel with proseal LMA in adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia without paralysis: A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Gurudas Kini; Gopalkrishna Mettinadka Devanna; Koteswara Rao Mukkapati; Souvik Chaudhuri; Daniel Thomas
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04

9.  Comparison of i-gel supraglottic airway and LMA-ProSeal™ in pediatric patients under controlled ventilation.

Authors:  Sai Saran; Sandeep Kumar Mishra; Ashok Shankar Badhe; Arumugam Vasudevan; Lenin Babu Elakkumanan; Gayatri Mishra
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04

Review 10.  Small is the new big: An overview of newer supraglottic airways for children.

Authors:  Rakhee Goyal
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.