Literature DB >> 16428451

Differential contributions of mammalian Rad54 paralogs to recombination, DNA damage repair, and meiosis.

Joanna Wesoly1, Sheba Agarwal, Stefan Sigurdsson, Wendy Bussen, Stephen Van Komen, Jian Qin, Harry van Steeg, Jan van Benthem, Evelyne Wassenaar, Willy M Baarends, Mehrnaz Ghazvini, Agnieszka A Tafel, Helen Heath, Niels Galjart, Jeroen Essers, J Anton Grootegoed, Norman Arnheim, Olga Bezzubova, Jean-Marie Buerstedde, Patrick Sung, Roland Kanaar.   

Abstract

Homologous recombination is a versatile DNA damage repair pathway requiring Rad51 and Rad54. Here we show that a mammalian Rad54 paralog, Rad54B, displays physical and functional interactions with Rad51 and DNA that are similar to those of Rad54. While ablation of Rad54 in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells leads to a mild reduction in homologous recombination efficiency, the absence of Rad54B has little effect. However, the absence of both Rad54 and Rad54B dramatically reduces homologous recombination efficiency. Furthermore, we show that Rad54B protects ES cells from ionizing radiation and the interstrand DNA cross-linking agent mitomycin C. Interestingly, at the ES cell level the paralogs do not display an additive or synergic interaction with respect to mitomycin C sensitivity, yet animals lacking both Rad54 and Rad54B are dramatically sensitized to mitomycin C compared to either single mutant. This suggests that the paralogs possibly function in a tissue-specific manner. Finally, we show that Rad54, but not Rad54B, is needed for a normal distribution of Rad51 on meiotic chromosomes. Thus, even though the paralogs have similar biochemical properties, genetic analysis in mice uncovered their nonoverlapping roles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16428451      PMCID: PMC1347043          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.26.3.976-989.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  63 in total

1.  Homologous and non-homologous recombination differentially affect DNA damage repair in mice.

Authors:  J Essers; H van Steeg; J de Wit; S M Swagemakers; M Vermeij; J H Hoeijmakers; R Kanaar
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-04-03       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  The importance of repairing stalled replication forks.

Authors:  M M Cox; M F Goodman; K N Kreuzer; D J Sherratt; S J Sandler; K J Marians
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Analysis of ionizing radiation-induced foci of DNA damage repair proteins.

Authors:  Lieneke R van Veelen; Tiziana Cervelli; Mandy W M M van de Rakt; Arjan F Theil; Jeroen Essers; Roland Kanaar
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  A novel human rad54 homologue, Rad54B, associates with Rad51.

Authors:  K Tanaka; T Hiramoto; T Fukuda; K Miyagawa
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-08-25       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Promotion of Rad51-dependent D-loop formation by yeast recombination factor Rdh54/Tid1.

Authors:  G Petukhova; P Sung; H Klein
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Single strand DNA binding and annealing activities in the yeast recombination factor Rad59.

Authors:  G Petukhova; S A Stratton; P Sung
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-11-26       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Tid1/Rdh54 promotes colocalization of rad51 and dmc1 during meiotic recombination.

Authors:  M Shinohara; S L Gasior; D K Bishop; A Shinohara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Mouse RAD54 affects DNA double-strand break repair and sister chromatid exchange.

Authors:  M L Dronkert; H B Beverloo; R D Johnson; J H Hoeijmakers; M Jasin; R Kanaar
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Superhelicity-driven homologous DNA pairing by yeast recombination factors Rad51 and Rad54.

Authors:  S Van Komen; G Petukhova; S Sigurdsson; S Stratton; P Sung
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Loss of HR6B ubiquitin-conjugating activity results in damaged synaptonemal complex structure and increased crossing-over frequency during the male meiotic prophase.

Authors:  Willy M Baarends; Evelyne Wassenaar; Jos W Hoogerbrugge; Gert van Cappellen; Henk P Roest; Jan Vreeburg; Marja Ooms; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; J Anton Grootegoed
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  62 in total

1.  Relationship of an hRAD54 gene polymorphism (2290 C/T) in an Ecuadorian population with chronic myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  César Paz-Y-Miño; Andrés López-Cortés; María José Muñoz; Bernardo Castro; Alejandro Cabrera; María Eugenia Sánchez
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 1.771

Review 2.  Mechanisms of gene targeting in higher eukaryotes.

Authors:  Akinori Tokunaga; Hirofumi Anai; Katsuhiro Hanada
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Rad54 and Mus81 cooperation promotes DNA damage repair and restrains chromosome missegregation.

Authors:  S El Ghamrasni; R Cardoso; L Li; K K N Guturi; V A Bjerregaard; Y Liu; S Venkatesan; M P Hande; J T Henderson; O Sanchez; I D Hickson; A Hakem; R Hakem
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  The structure-specific endonuclease Mus81-Eme1 promotes conversion of interstrand DNA crosslinks into double-strands breaks.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Hanada; Magda Budzowska; Mauro Modesti; Alex Maas; Claire Wyman; Jeroen Essers; Roland Kanaar
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Genetic evidence that synaptonemal complex axial elements govern recombination pathway choice in mice.

Authors:  Xin Chenglin Li; Ewelina Bolcun-Filas; John C Schimenti
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Quality control of DNA break metabolism: in the 'end', it's a good thing.

Authors:  Roland Kanaar; Claire Wyman; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 7.  DNA-damage repair; the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Authors:  Razqallah Hakem
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 8.  Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance.

Authors:  Xuan Li; Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

9.  Combined optical and topographic imaging reveals different arrangements of human RAD54 with presynaptic and postsynaptic RAD51-DNA filaments.

Authors:  Humberto Sanchez; Aryandi Kertokalio; Sari van Rossum-Fikkert; Roland Kanaar; Claire Wyman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Rad54, the motor of homologous recombination.

Authors:  Alexander V Mazin; Olga M Mazina; Dmitry V Bugreev; Matthew J Rossi
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.