Literature DB >> 16425123

Robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery: use of a telemanipulator slave robot to perform microvascular anastomoses.

Ryan D Katz1, Jesse A Taylor, Gedge D Rosson, Phillip R Brown, Navin K Singh.   

Abstract

Many methods for microvascular anastomoses exist, including use of magnifying loupes (x 2.5, x 3.5, x 4.5, x 6), but the operating microscope remains the gold standard. The authors present the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) as an alternative method for performing microvascular anastomoses. The da Vinci robot has fully articulating microinstruments with six degrees of freedom, the ability to filter tremor, the capability to perform telesurgery, and the advantage of 3-D visualization. It offers full and dynamic control over the operating camera, allowing variable positioning and the ability to scale down movements. Its drawbacks include initial high cost, lack of haptic feedback, decreased participation of the first assistant, and lack of widespread availability. In this feasibility study, multiple microanastomoses were performed in canine tarsal and superficial femoral vessels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16425123     DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-931908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  11 in total

1.  An endoscopic approach to longitudinal structures including muscle flaps and vein, tendon, and nerve grafts.

Authors:  Geoffrey G Hallock; David C Rice
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  A brief history of minimally invasive plastic surgery.

Authors:  Geoffrey G Hallock
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Robotic Approaches to Palatoplasty and the Treatment of Velopharyngeal Dysfunction.

Authors:  James M Smartt; Patrick Gerety; Jesse A Taylor
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 4.  Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Farshid Amirabdollahian; Salvatore Livatino; Behrad Vahedi; Radhika Gudipati; Patrick Sheen; Shan Gawrie-Mohan; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-12-01

Review 5.  [The reconstructive sequence in the 21st century. A reconstructive clockwork].

Authors:  K Knobloch; P M Vogt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  eConsultation in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

Authors:  M J Trovato; A J Scholer; E Vallejo; G M Buncke; M S Granick
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2011-11-30

7.  A Systematic Review of the Role of Robotics in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery-From Inception to the Future.

Authors:  Thomas D Dobbs; Olivia Cundy; Harsh Samarendra; Khurram Khan; Iain Stuart Whitaker
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-11-15

8.  Robotic assistance in urological microsurgery: initial report of a successful in-vivo robot-assisted vasovasostomy.

Authors:  G De Naeyer; P Van Migem; P Schatteman; P Carpentier; E Fonteyne; A Mottrie
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2007-05-30

9.  Current Limitations of Surgical Robotics in Reconstructive Plastic Microsurgery.

Authors:  Youri P A Tan; Philippe Liverneaux; Jason K F Wong
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-03-22

Review 10.  Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade.

Authors:  Takeshi Namekawa; Takashi Imamoto; Mayuko Kato; Akira Komiya; Tomohiko Ichikawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.