Literature DB >> 16425081

The effect of esophageal and gastric distension on the crural diaphragm.

Ahmed Shafik1, Ismail Shafik, Olfat El Sibai, Randa M Mostafa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of prevention of gastric reflux into the esophagus is not exactly known. The lower esophagus has a barrier function provided by the lower esophageal sphincter. We investigated the hypothesis that the crural diaphragm shares in the barrier function not only mechanically but also actively through a crural-esophageal-gastric reflex action.
METHODS: The study was performed during repair of abdominal ventral and incisional hernias in 20 subjects (11 men, 9 women; age 38.6+/-4.8 years). The electromyographic response of the crural diaphragm to individual balloon distension of esophagus and stomach was recorded by means of a needle electrode inserted into the crural diaphragm and connected to an electromyographic apparatus. The recordings were repeated after separate crural, esophageal, and gastric anesthetization.
RESULTS: The crural diaphragm exhibited basal motor unit action potentials, which decreased on esophageal distension (P<0.001) after a mean latency of 17.3+/-2.8 SD ms. The crural diaphragm response to esophageal distension did not occur after the crural diaphragm or esophagus was anesthetized. Gastric distension effected an increase of crural diaphragm electromyographic activity with a mean latency of 18.4+/-4.6 ms; this effect could not be achieved after the crural diaphragm or stomach was anesthetized.
CONCLUSIONS: The crural diaphragm has a resting tone that relaxes after esophageal distension and contracts after gastric distension. This sphincter-like action of the crural diaphragm appears to be a reflex and is mediated through the esophagocrural inhibitory and gastrocrural excitatory reflexes. The crural diaphragm seems to share actively in the gastroesophageal competence mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16425081     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-0282-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  22 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts of the antireflux barrier.

Authors:  R K Mittal
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.806

2.  Electrical and mechanical inhibition of the crural diaphragm during transient relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  R K Mittal; M J Fisher
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Timing of videofluoroscopic, manometric events, and bolus transit during the oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing.

Authors:  I J Cook; W J Dodds; R O Dantas; M K Kern; B T Massey; R Shaker; W J Hogan
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Recognition of a gastroesophageal reflex in dogs and its role in lower esophageal sphincter competence.

Authors:  A Shafik
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.745

5.  Lower esophageal sphincter pressure changes after food ingestion.

Authors:  O T Nebel; D O Castell
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  The nature and location of lower esophageal ring.

Authors:  R K Goyal; J L Bauer; H M Spiro
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1971-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Deglutition.

Authors:  A J Miller
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  Mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux in recumbent asymptomatic human subjects.

Authors:  J Dent; W J Dodds; R H Friedman; T Sekiguchi; W J Hogan; R C Arndorfer; D J Petrie
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  The effect of intravesical resiniferatoxin in patients with idiopathic detrusor instability suggests that involuntary detrusor contractions are triggered by C-fiber input.

Authors:  Carlos Silva; Maria Jose Ribeiro; Francisco Cruz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Normal and disordered swallowing: new insights.

Authors:  I J Cook
Journal:  Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  Minimal versus obligatory dissection of the diaphragmatic hiatus during magnetic sphincter augmentation surgery.

Authors:  James M Tatum; Evan Alicuben; Nikolai Bildzukewicz; Kamran Samakar; Caitlin C Houghton; John C Lipham
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Modeling of the mechanical function of the human gastroesophageal junction using an anatomically realistic three-dimensional model.

Authors:  R Yassi; L K Cheng; V Rajagopal; M P Nash; J A Windsor; A J Pullan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 2.712

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.