Literature DB >> 16425034

The steel ball-bearing test: a new test for evaluating protective sensation in the diabetic foot.

N Papanas1, A Gries, E Maltezos, R Zick.   

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the study was to assess a new steel ball-bearing test as a means of evaluating protective sensation in the diabetic foot.
METHODS: Subjects were enrolled for this study as follows: (1) 39 patients (mean age 61.3+/-9.7 years) with neuropathy and prior neuropathic ulcer (Group A); (2) 36 patients (mean age 63.7+/-10.1 years) with neuropathy without neuropathic ulcer (Group B); (3) 34 patients (mean age 52.1+/-10.4 years) without neuropathy (Group C); and (4) 21 healthy volunteers (mean age 46.7+/-8.7 years) (Group D). Neuropathy was diagnosed by means of neuropathy disability score (NDS). The plantar area over the second metatarsal head of each foot was examined with steel ball-bearings of varying diameters. The smallest diameter that the patient could feel was used to define the ball-bearing score (range 1-6).
RESULTS: A high ball-bearing score was significantly more frequent in patients with neuropathic ulceration than in neuropathic patients without ulceration and in diabetic patients without neuropathy (p<0.001). A high score was also more frequent in neuropathic patients without ulceration, than in patients without neuropathy (p<0.001). The ball-bearing score was significantly (p=0.01) correlated with the NDS, the monofilament test, the vibration perception threshold and the thermal perception threshold. The ball-bearing test had a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 100% for impaired protective sensation due to neuropathy, and a sensitivity of 84.6% and a specificity of 86.1% for detection of patients with prior neuropathic ulceration. CONCLUSIONS/
INTERPRETATION: The steel ball-bearing test has a high sensitivity and specificity both for the evaluation of protective sensation and for detection of patients with prior neuropathic ulceration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16425034     DOI: 10.1007/s00125-005-0111-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetologia        ISSN: 0012-186X            Impact factor:   10.122


  15 in total

Review 1.  Medical treatment of peripheral arterial disease and claudication.

Authors:  W R Hiatt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Screening techniques to identify people at high risk for diabetic foot ulceration: a prospective multicenter trial.

Authors:  H Pham; D G Armstrong; C Harvey; L B Harkless; J M Giurini; A Veves
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Evaluation of three screening tests and a risk assessment model for diagnosing peripheral neuropathy in the diabetes clinic.

Authors:  D Olaleye; B A Perkins; V Bril
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.602

4.  Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments: a simple, effective and inexpensive screening device for identifying diabetic patients at risk of foot ulceration.

Authors:  S Kumar; D J Fernando; A Veves; E A Knowles; M J Young; A J Boulton
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.602

5.  Choosing a practical screening instrument to identify patients at risk for diabetic foot ulceration.

Authors:  D G Armstrong; L A Lavery; S A Vela; T L Quebedeaux; J G Fleischli
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-02-09

6.  The North-West Diabetes Foot Care Study: incidence of, and risk factors for, new diabetic foot ulceration in a community-based patient cohort.

Authors:  C A Abbott; A L Carrington; H Ashe; S Bath; L C Every; J Griffiths; A W Hann; A Hussein; N Jackson; K E Johnson; C H Ryder; R Torkington; E R E Van Ross; A M Whalley; P Widdows; S Williamson; A J M Boulton
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.359

7.  A comparison of the Neuropen against standard quantitative sensory-threshold measures for assessing peripheral nerve function.

Authors:  A N Paisley; C A Abbott; C H M van Schie; A J M Boulton
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.359

8.  Comparison of vibration perception thresholds obtained with the Neurothesiometer and the CASE IV and relationship to nerve conduction studies.

Authors:  Vera Bril; B A Perkins
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.359

9.  Thermal thresholds predict painfulness of diabetic neuropathies.

Authors:  Heidrun H Krämer; Roman Rolke; Andreas Bickel; Frank Birklein
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 10.  The diabetic foot: from art to science. The 18th Camillo Golgi lecture.

Authors:  A J M Boulton
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 10.122

View more
  4 in total

1.  The diabetic foot: a global threat and a huge challenge for Greece.

Authors:  N Papanas; E Maltezos
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 0.471

Review 2.  New vistas in the diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy.

Authors:  Nikolaos Papanas; Dan Ziegler
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 3.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Monofilament Tests for Detecting Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fengyi Wang; Jiaqi Zhang; Jiadan Yu; Shaxin Liu; Rengang Zhang; Xichao Ma; Yonghong Yang; Pu Wang
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2017-10-08       Impact factor: 4.011

4.  The Diagnostic Utility of VibraTip for Distal Symmetrical Polyneuropathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Nikolaos Papanas; Kalliopi Pafili; Maria Demetriou; Stella Papachristou; Soultana Kyroglou; Dimitrios Papazoglou; Efstratios Maltezos
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.945

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.