BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In studies with small numbers of cases, it has been shown that endoscopic resection of adenomas in ulcerative colitis represents adequate treatment. In a larger study cohort with more prolonged follow up, we assessed the reliability of this finding. METHODS: Between 1988 and 2002, 148 consecutive patients, mainly from private gastroenterologists' practices, with ulcerative colitis were diagnosed as having an adenoma. In 60 patients, histological diagnosis was established in biopsies and in 87 patients in polypectomy specimens; one patient underwent proctocolectomy following diagnosis. The outcome of these patients was analysed after a mean follow up period of 6.0 (3.63) years. RESULTS: Among 60 patients, surprisingly without endoscopic treatment, 48.3% developed ulcerative colitis associated neoplasia in the same colon segment (23.3% low grade intraepithelial neoplasia; 8.3% high grade intraepithelial neoplasia; 16.7% carcinoma). Among 87 patients undergoing polypectomy of the adenoma, follow up revealed colitis associated neoplasia in other segments of colon in 4.6% of cases. CONCLUSION: Development of adenocarcinomas in a total of 6.7% of the overall patient group, and in 2.3% of those undergoing polypectomy, indicates that biopsy based diagnosis of an adenoma in ulcerative colitis must be considered to mandate endoscopic resection of the lesion; 40% of affected patients did not receive any form of endoscopic removal of the lesion. This shows that the most recent guidelines are not followed in a considerable number of patients with ulcerative colitis in private practice in Germany. Although polypectomy of the adenoma represents adequate therapy, further regular follow up examinations are nevertheless necessary.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In studies with small numbers of cases, it has been shown that endoscopic resection of adenomas in ulcerative colitis represents adequate treatment. In a larger study cohort with more prolonged follow up, we assessed the reliability of this finding. METHODS: Between 1988 and 2002, 148 consecutive patients, mainly from private gastroenterologists' practices, with ulcerative colitis were diagnosed as having an adenoma. In 60 patients, histological diagnosis was established in biopsies and in 87 patients in polypectomy specimens; one patient underwent proctocolectomy following diagnosis. The outcome of these patients was analysed after a mean follow up period of 6.0 (3.63) years. RESULTS: Among 60 patients, surprisingly without endoscopic treatment, 48.3% developed ulcerative colitis associated neoplasia in the same colon segment (23.3% low grade intraepithelial neoplasia; 8.3% high grade intraepithelial neoplasia; 16.7% carcinoma). Among 87 patients undergoing polypectomy of the adenoma, follow up revealed colitis associated neoplasia in other segments of colon in 4.6% of cases. CONCLUSION: Development of adenocarcinomas in a total of 6.7% of the overall patient group, and in 2.3% of those undergoing polypectomy, indicates that biopsy based diagnosis of an adenoma in ulcerative colitis must be considered to mandate endoscopic resection of the lesion; 40% of affected patients did not receive any form of endoscopic removal of the lesion. This shows that the most recent guidelines are not followed in a considerable number of patients with ulcerative colitis in private practice in Germany. Although polypectomy of the adenoma represents adequate therapy, further regular follow up examinations are nevertheless necessary.
Authors: David P Hurlstone; Mark E McAlindon; David S Sanders; Rachel Koegh; Alan J Lobo; Simon S Cross Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: F Fogt; S J Urbanski; M E Sanders; E E Furth; R L Zimmerman; J J Deren; A E Noffsinger; A O Vortmeyer; C J Hartmann; R L Odze; C A Brown Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Ralf Kiesslich; Johannes Fritsch; Martin Holtmann; Heinz H Koehler; Manfred Stolte; Stephan Kanzler; Bernhard Nafe; Michael Jung; Peter R Galle; Markus F Neurath Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: P H Rubin; S Friedman; N Harpaz; E Goldstein; J Weiser; J Schiller; J D Waye; D H Present Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Ralf Kiesslich; Juergen Burg; Michael Vieth; Janina Gnaendiger; Meike Enders; Peter Delaney; Adrian Polglase; Wendy McLaren; Daniela Janell; Steven Thomas; Bernhard Nafe; Peter R Galle; Markus F Neurath Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Helmut Neumann; Michael Vieth; Cord Langner; Markus F Neurath; Jonas Mudter Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2011-07-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Cord Langner; Fernando Magro; Ann Driessen; Arzu Ensari; Gerassimos J Mantzaris; Vincenzo Villanacci; Gabriel Becheanu; Paula Borralho Nunes; Gieri Cathomas; Walter Fries; Anne Jouret-Mourin; Claudia Mescoli; Giovanni de Petris; Carlos A Rubio; Neil A Shepherd; Michael Vieth; Rami Eliakim; Karel Geboes Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2014-02-01 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: John E Eaton; Jayant A Talwalkar; Konstantinos N Lazaridis; Gregory J Gores; Keith D Lindor Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 22.682