Literature DB >> 16423555

DNA damage evaluated by gammaH2AX foci formation by a selective group of chemical/physical stressors.

Chunxian Zhou1, Zhongxiang Li, Huiling Diao, Yanke Yu, Wen Zhu, Yayun Dai, Fanqing F Chen, Jun Yang.   

Abstract

It has been reported that the phosphorylated form of histone variant H2AX (gammaH2AX) plays an important role in the recruitment of DNA repair and checkpoint proteins to sites of DNA damage, particularly at double strand breaks (DSBs). Using gammaH2AX foci formation as an indicator for DNA damage, several chemicals/stress factors were chosen to assess their ability to induce gammaH2AX foci in a 24h time frame in a human amnion FL cell line. Two direct-acting genotoxins, methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU), can induce gammaH2AX foci formation in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Similarly, an indirect-acting genotoxin, benzo[a]pyrene (BP), also induced the formation of gammaH2AX foci in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Another indirect genotoxin, 2-acetyl-aminofluorene (AAF), did not induce gammaH2AX foci formation in FL cells; however, AAF can induce gammaH2AX foci formation in Chinese hamster CHL cells. Neutral comet assays also revealed the induction of DNA strand breaks by these agents. In contrast, epigenetic carcinogens azathioprine and cyclosporine A, as well as non-carcinogen dimethyl sulfoxide, did not induce gammaH2AX foci formation in FL cells. In addition, heat shock and hypertonic saline did not induce gammaH2AX foci. Cell survival analyses indicated that the induction of gammaH2AX is not correlated with the cytotoxic effects of these agents/factors. Taken together, these results suggest that gammaH2AX foci formation could be used for evaluating DNA damage; however, the different cell types used may play an important role in determining gammaH2AX foci formation induced by a specific agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16423555      PMCID: PMC2756993          DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  46 in total

1.  Hyperosmolality in the form of elevated NaCl but not urea causes DNA damage in murine kidney cells.

Authors:  D Kültz; D Chakravarty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Histone H2A variants H2AX and H2AZ.

Authors:  Christophe Redon; Duane Pilch; Emmy Rogakou; Olga Sedelnikova; Kenneth Newrock; William Bonner
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  Cell cycle-dependent expression of phosphorylated histone H2AX: reduced expression in unirradiated but not X-irradiated G1-phase cells.

Authors:  Susan H MacPhail; Judit P Banáth; Ying Yu; Eric Chu; Peggy L Olive
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  DNA-PK is responsible for enhanced phosphorylation of histone H2AX under hypertonic conditions.

Authors:  Tarren Reitsema; Dmitry Klokov; Judit P Banáth; Peggy L Olive
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2005-09-28

6.  ATM phosphorylates histone H2AX in response to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  S Burma; B P Chen; M Murphy; A Kurimasa; D J Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-09-24       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Histone H2AX is phosphorylated in an ATR-dependent manner in response to replicational stress.

Authors:  I M Ward; J Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-10-22       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  DNA damage-induced G2-M checkpoint activation by histone H2AX and 53BP1.

Authors:  Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo; Hua-Tang Chen; Arkady Celeste; Irene Ward; Peter J Romanienko; Julio C Morales; Kazuhito Naka; Zhenfang Xia; R Daniel Camerini-Otero; Noboru Motoyama; Phillip B Carpenter; William M Bonner; Junjie Chen; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  High-throughput measurement of the Tp53 response to anticancer drugs and random compounds using a stably integrated Tp53-responsive luciferase reporter.

Authors:  Taylor A Sohn; Ravi Bansal; Gloria H Su; Kathleen M Murphy; Scott E Kern
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.944

10.  Regulation of proinflammatory cytokines in human lung epithelial cells infected with Mycoplasma pneumoniae.

Authors:  Jun Yang; W Craig Hooper; Donald J Phillips; Deborah F Talkington
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  21 in total

1.  Widdrol activates DNA damage checkpoint through the signaling Chk2-p53-Cdc25A-p21-MCM4 pathway in HT29 cells.

Authors:  Hee Jung Yun; Sook Kyung Hyun; Jung Ha Park; Byung Woo Kim; Hyun Ju Kwon
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 3.396

2.  Cytoprotective effect of hyaluronic acid and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose against DNA damage induced by thimerosal in Chang conjunctival cells.

Authors:  Juan Ye; Huina Zhang; Han Wu; Changjun Wang; Xin Shi; Jiajun Xie; Jinjing He; Jun Yang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  High molecular weight hyaluronan decreases oxidative DNA damage induced by EDTA in human corneal epithelial cells.

Authors:  J Ye; H Wu; Y Wu; C Wang; H Zhang; X Shi; J Yang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 4.  Hyperosmotic stress response: comparison with other cellular stresses.

Authors:  Roberta R Alfieri; Pier Giorgio Petronini
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 3.657

5.  Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection induces reactive oxygen species and DNA damage in A549 human lung carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Gongping Sun; Xuefeng Xu; Yingshuo Wang; Xiaoyun Shen; Zhimin Chen; Jun Yang
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Benzo(a)pyrene induces similar gene expression changes in testis of DNA repair proficient and deficient mice.

Authors:  Nicole Verhofstad; Jeroen L A Pennings; Conny Th M van Oostrom; Jan van Benthem; Frederik J van Schooten; Harry van Steeg; Roger W L Godschalk
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  3-Methyladenine DNA glycosylase is important for cellular resistance to psoralen interstrand cross-links.

Authors:  Ayelet Maor-Shoshani; Lisiane B Meira; Xuemei Yang; Leona D Samson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-06-20

8.  DNA damage and growth hormone hypersecretion in pituitary somatotroph adenomas.

Authors:  Anat Ben-Shlomo; Nan Deng; Evelyn Ding; Masaaki Yamamoto; Adam Mamelak; Vera Chesnokova; Artak Labadzhyan; Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Expanded usage of the Challenge-Comet assay as a DNA repair biomarker in human populations: protocols for fresh and cryopreserved blood samples, and for different challenge agents.

Authors:  Vanessa Valdiglesias; María Sánchez-Flores; Natalia Fernández-Bertólez; William Au; Eduardo Pásaro; Blanca Laffon
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.153

10.  Cell-cycle restriction limits DNA damage and maintains self-renewal of leukaemia stem cells.

Authors:  Andrea Viale; Francesca De Franco; Annette Orleth; Valeria Cambiaghi; Virginia Giuliani; Daniela Bossi; Chiara Ronchini; Simona Ronzoni; Ivan Muradore; Silvia Monestiroli; Alberto Gobbi; Myriam Alcalay; Saverio Minucci; Pier Giuseppe Pelicci
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.