Literature DB >> 16421655

Cardiovascular health status and health risk assessment method of preference among worksite employees.

Lisa M Marschke1, George J Allen, Denis A Coble, Scott R Zellner, Randi Klein, Barbara Aiudi, Donna Murphy, Linda S Pescatello.   

Abstract

We investigated whether employees (n = 62) selecting a self-report Health Risk Assessment (HRA) would be at increased CVD risk compared to employees (n = 114) choosing an HRA with measurement of cardiovascular (CVD) health indicators. Participants were mostly middle-aged (44.1 +/- 0.8 yr) men (71.6%) displaying borderline features of the cardiometabolic syndrome. Although there were no significant differences between the groups regarding their measured CVD health status or self-reported lifestyle habits, employees in both groups consistently over-stated their level of cardiovascular health. Contrary to reports in the literature, cardiovascular health status did not appear to influence employee HRA method of preference.Editors' Strategic Implications: These findings await replication in other samples, both more diverse and less self-selected. Nonetheless, the authors' methods and their conclusions about workers' over-estimation of their health and the lack of differences across assessment methods will be useful to employers, health professionals, and all practitioners with an interest in health risk assessments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16421655     DOI: 10.1007/s10935-005-0023-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prim Prev        ISSN: 0278-095X


  21 in total

1.  Can sedentary adults accurately recall the intensity of their physical activity?

Authors:  G E Duncan; S J Sydeman; M G Perri; M C Limacher; A D Martin
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  A case study of 10-year health risk appraisal participation patterns in a comprehensive health promotion program.

Authors:  S Musich; L Adams; G DeWolf; D W Edington
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

3.  Efficacy of computerized health risk appraisal as part of a periodic health examination at the worksite.

Authors:  D H Gemson; R P Sloan
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug

4.  Self-selection in responding to a health risk appraisal: are we preaching to the choir?

Authors:  D S Nice; S I Woodruff
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  1990-05

5.  Worksite health promotion. The benefits of providing personal health status feedback and education programs to employees.

Authors:  R C Anderson; K E Anderson
Journal:  AAOHN J       Date:  1991-02

6.  Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories.

Authors:  P W Wilson; R B D'Agostino; D Levy; A M Belanger; H Silbershatz; W B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-05-12       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Characteristics of self-selected responders to a health risk appraisal: generalizability of corporate health assessments.

Authors:  W D Lynch; T J Golaszewski; A Clearie; D M Vickery
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge.

Authors:  W T Friedewald; R I Levy; D S Fredrickson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Distortion in self-reported height and weight data.

Authors:  P Pirie; D Jacobs; R Jeffery; P Hannan
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1981-06

10.  Self-reported and measured weights and heights of participants in community-based weight loss programs.

Authors:  L R DelPrete; M Caldwell; C English; S W Banspach; C Lefebvre
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1992-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  Health risk reduction programs in employer-sponsored health plans: Part I-efficacy.

Authors:  Mark A Rothstein; Heather L Harrell
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.162

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.