Literature DB >> 10150537

Efficacy of computerized health risk appraisal as part of a periodic health examination at the worksite.

D H Gemson1, R P Sloan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of computerized health risk appraisal (HRA) when it is incorporated into a periodic health examination at the worksite.
DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trial comparing change in health behaviors for a 6-month follow-up period was conducted.
SETTING: A large financial services firm in New York City.
SUBJECTS: A total of 161 employees who volunteered for a worksite periodic health examination. INTERVENTION: All employees received a physician-based history and physical examination, including laboratory tests, and were counseled on the basis of the results. Half the employees were randomly assigned to receive an HRA report with counseling from the 1984 version of the Centers for Disease Control HRA, whereas the other half completed the HRA questionnaire but received no HRA report or counseling. MEASURES: Blood pressure, cholesterol, and weight were measured by project staff, physical activity and seatbelt use were measured by self-report, and change in computerized appraised age was calculated by the HRA program.
RESULTS: Evaluation of the 90 participants who returned for follow-up revealed a statistically significant improvement in computerized appraised age and physical activity in those who has received the HRA report and counseling compared with those who had not (p < or = .05), and also showed trends toward greater improvement in blood pressure, weight, and seatbelt use.
CONCLUSIONS: Results provide support for the efficacy of HRA when incorporated into a periodic health examination at the worksite.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 10150537     DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-9.6.462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  5 in total

Review 1.  Health promotion: causes, beliefs and measurements.

Authors:  Robert D Galloway
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2003-07

Review 2.  Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  S Ebrahim; A Beswick; M Burke; G Davey Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

3.  Cardiovascular health status and health risk assessment method of preference among worksite employees.

Authors:  Lisa M Marschke; George J Allen; Denis A Coble; Scott R Zellner; Randi Klein; Barbara Aiudi; Donna Murphy; Linda S Pescatello
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2006-01

4.  Factors associated with non-participation and drop-out in a lifestyle intervention for workers with an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Iris F Groeneveld; Karin I Proper; Allard J van der Beek; Vincent H Hildebrandt; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  Physician perceptions of primary prevention: qualitative base for the conceptual shaping of a practice intervention tool.

Authors:  Amy L Mirand; Gregory P Beehler; Christina L Kuo; Martin C Mahoney
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.