Literature DB >> 1642144

Bone mineral density in the proximal femur and hip fracture type in the elderly.

N Nakamura1, T Kyou, K Takaoka, K Ohzono, K Ono.   

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) in the contralateral proximal femur in 100 female elderly patients with hip fracture and the 35 controls without hip fracture were investigated using dual-photon absorptiometry. The hip fracture patients were divided into intracapsular fracture (n = 53) and extracapsular fracture (n = 47) groups, and these two groups were further divided into five subgroups according to fracture site: intracapsular fracture type 1 (transcervical fracture, n = 29) and type 2 (subcapital fracture, n = 24); extracapsular fracture type 1 (intertrochanteric line fracture, n = 13), type 2 (pertrochanteric fracture, n = 28), and type 3 (combined type of pertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fracture, n = 6). The intracapsular fracture group showed BMD values similar to those of controls; the extracapsular fracture group showed significantly lower BMD values than controls. When these two were subclassified into five subgroups, different results were seen in terms of BMD value in the proximal femur and fracture types; intracapsular fracture type 1 showed BMD values equivalent to those of controls; on the other hand, type 2 showed significantly lower BMD value than controls, and the BMD distribution in the proximal femur among the extracapsular fracture subgroups 1-3 differed, although all of them showed significantly lower BMD values than controls. The degree of trauma causing the fractures was also assessed according to available anamnestic data, but no significant difference was found in trauma tendency between the intra- and the extracapsular fracture group or among the subgroups in each group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1642144     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650070705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of femoral morphology and bone mineral density between femoral neck fractures and trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Yuki Maeda; Nobuhiko Sugano; Masanobu Saito; Kazuo Yonenobu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Increase in femoral bone density in young women following high-impact exercise.

Authors:  E J Bassey; S J Ramsdale
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Distribution of vertebral fractures varies among patients according to hip fracture type.

Authors:  J Watt; L Cox; R G Crilly
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Comparison of hip fracture and osteoporosis medication prescription rates across Canadian provinces.

Authors:  R G Crilly; M Kloseck; B Chesworth; S Mequanint; E Sadowski; J Gilliland
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Time trends of age-adjusted incidence rates of first hip fractures: a register-based study among older people in Viborg County, Denmark, 1987-1997.

Authors:  I M Giversen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Bone mineral density in Chinese elderly women with hip fracture.

Authors:  R S Yang; T K Liu; F J Dorey; P U Chieng
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry densitometry in women with hip fracture.

Authors:  C Mautalen; E Vega; D González; P Carrilero; A Otaño; F Silberman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Risk factors for severity and type of the hip fracture.

Authors:  Jane A Cauley; Li-Yung Lui; Harry K Genant; Loran Salamone; Warren Browner; Howard A Fink; Peter Cohen; Teresa Hillier; Doug C Bauer; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  D Marshall; O Johnell; H Wedel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-18

10.  A comparison of bone density and bone morphology between patients presenting with hip fractures, spinal fractures or a combination of the two.

Authors:  Richard G Crilly; Lizebeth Cox
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.