Literature DB >> 16419824

A perceptual learning investigation of the pitch elicited by amplitude-modulated noise.

Matthew B Fitzgerald1, Beverly A Wright.   

Abstract

Noise that is amplitude modulated at rates ranging from 40 to 850 Hz can elicit a sensation of pitch. Here, the processing of this temporally based pitch was investigated using a perceptual-learning paradigm. Nine listeners were trained (1 hour per day for 6-8 days) to discriminate a standard rate of sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) from a faster rate in a single condition (150 Hz SAM rate, 5 kHz low-pass carrier). All trained listeners improved significantly on that condition. These trained listeners subsequently showed no more improvement than nine untrained controls on pure-tone and rippled-noise discrimination with the same pitch, and on SAM-rate discrimination with a 30 Hz rate, although they did show some improvement with a 300 Hz rate. In addition, most trained, but not control, listeners were worse at detecting SAM at 150 Hz after, compared to before training. These results indicate that listeners can learn to improve their ability to discriminate SAM rate with multiple-hour training and that the mechanism that is modified by learning encodes (1) the pitch of SAM noise but not that of pure tones and rippled noise, (2) different SAM rates separately, and (3) differences in SAM rate more effectively than cues for SAM detection.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16419824     DOI: 10.1121/1.2074687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  24 in total

1.  Prolonged maturation of auditory perception and learning in gerbils.

Authors:  Emma C Sarro; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.964

2.  Maximizing cochlear implant patients' performance with advanced speech training procedures.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Learning-induced plasticity in auditory spatial representations revealed by electrical neuroimaging.

Authors:  Lucas Spierer; Eric Tardif; Holger Sperdin; Micah M Murray; Stephanie Clarke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Influences of modulation and spatial separation on detection of a masked broadband target.

Authors:  Norbert Kopco; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  A review of the generalization of auditory learning.

Authors:  Beverly A Wright; Yuxuan Zhang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning.

Authors:  Merav Ahissar; Mor Nahum; Israel Nelken; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Learning, worsening, and generalization in response to auditory perceptual training during adolescence.

Authors:  Julia Jones Huyck; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Pitch discrimination learning: specificity for pitch and harmonic resolvability, and electrophysiological correlates.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-04-12

9.  Perceptual learning and generalization resulting from training on an auditory amplitude-modulation detection task.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Predicting favorable and unfavorable consequences of perceptual learning: worsening and the peak shift.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.