Literature DB >> 16418463

Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men: a randomized clinical trial.

Robert J Fitzgibbons1, Anita Giobbie-Hurder, James O Gibbs, Dorothy D Dunlop, Domenic J Reda, Martin McCarthy, Leigh A Neumayer, Jeffrey S T Barkun, James L Hoehn, Joseph T Murphy, George A Sarosi, William C Syme, Jon S Thompson, Jia Wang, Olga Jonasson.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Many men with inguinal hernia have minimal symptoms. Whether deferring surgical repair is a safe and acceptable option has not been assessed.
OBJECTIVE: To compare pain and the physical component score (PCS) of the Short Form-36 Version 2 survey at 2 years in men with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias treated with watchful waiting or surgical repair. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized trial conducted January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2004, at 5 North American centers and enrolling 720 men (364 watchful waiting, 356 surgical repair) followed up for 2 to 4.5 years.
INTERVENTIONS: Watchful-waiting patients were followed up at 6 months and annually and watched for hernia symptoms; repair patients received standard open tension-free repair and were followed up at 3 and 6 months and annually. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain and discomfort interfering with usual activities at 2 years and change in PCS from baseline to 2 years. Secondary outcomes were complications, patient-reported pain, functional status, activity levels, and satisfaction with care.
RESULTS: Primary intention-to-treat outcomes were similar at 2 years for watchful waiting vs surgical repair: pain limiting activities (5.1% vs 2.2%, respectively; P = .06 [corrected]); PCS (improvement over baseline, 0.29 points vs 0.13 points; P = .79). Twenty-three percent of patients assigned to watchful waiting crossed over to receive surgical repair (increase in hernia-related pain was the most common reason offered); 17% assigned to receive repair crossed over to watchful waiting. Self-reported pain in watchful-waiting patients crossing over improved after repair. Occurrence of postoperative hernia-related complications was similar in patients who received repair as assigned and in watchful-waiting patients who crossed over. One watchful-waiting patient (0.3%) experienced acute hernia incarceration without strangulation within 2 years; a second had acute incarceration with bowel obstruction at 4 years, with a frequency of 1.8/1000 patient-years inclusive of patients followed up for as long as 4.5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Watchful waiting is an acceptable option for men with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias. Delaying surgical repair until symptoms increase is safe because acute hernia incarcerations occur rarely.Clinical Trials Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00263250.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16418463     DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.3.285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  110 in total

1.  Quality of life after laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of an asymptomatic inguinal hernia.

Authors:  H Mason Hedberg; Tyler Hall; Matthew Gitelis; Brittany Lapin; Zeeshan Butt; John G Linn; Stephen Haggerty; Woody Denham; JoAnn Carbray; Michael B Ujiki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Feasibility of totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic hernia repair in elderly patients.

Authors:  Y Chung; J W Choi; H C Kim; S H Kim; S I Choi
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Trends in operation rates for inguinal hernia over five decades in England: database study.

Authors:  J J Maisonneuve; D Yeates; M J Goldacre
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Should we perform elective inguinal hernia repair in the elderly?

Authors:  J J Wu; B C Baldwin; E Goldwater; T C Counihan
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Is the presence of an inguinal hernia enough to justify repair?

Authors:  Leigh Neumayer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Hemoperitoneum following inguinal hernia repair: a case report.

Authors:  K E Buch; M Reiner; C M Divino
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Incidence of inguinal hernia repairs in Olmsted County, MN: a population-based study.

Authors:  Benjamin Zendejas; Tatiana Ramirez; Trahern Jones; Admire Kuchena; Shahzad M Ali; Roberto Hernandez-Irizarry; Christine M Lohse; David R Farley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  A prospective, randomized comparison of long-term outcomes: chronic groin pain and quality of life following totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Virinder Kumar Bansal; Mahesh C Misra; Divya Babu; Jonathan Victor; Subodh Kumar; Rajesh Sagar; S Rajeshwari; Asuri Krishna; Vimi Rewari
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Characterizing the global burden of surgical disease: a method to estimate inguinal hernia epidemiology in Ghana.

Authors:  Jessica H Beard; Lawrence B Oresanya; Michael Ohene-Yeboah; Rochelle A Dicker; Hobart W Harris
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  The Hernia-Neck-Ratio (HNR), a Novel Predictive Factor for Complications of Umbilical Hernia.

Authors:  T Fueter; M Schäfer; P Fournier; P Bize; N Demartines; P Allemann
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.