Literature DB >> 16412543

A rationale for determining, testing, and controlling specific impurities in pharmaceuticals that possess potential for genotoxicity.

Lutz Müller1, Robert J Mauthe, Christopher M Riley, Marta M Andino, David De Antonis, Chris Beels, Joseph DeGeorge, Alfons G M De Knaep, Dean Ellison, Jane A Fagerland, Rebecca Frank, Betsy Fritschel, Sheila Galloway, Ernie Harpur, Charles D N Humfrey, Alexander S Jacks, Nirdosh Jagota, John Mackinnon, Ganapathy Mohan, Daniel K Ness, Michael R O'Donovan, Mark D Smith, Gopi Vudathala, Larry Yotti.   

Abstract

The synthesis of pharmaceutical products frequently involves the use of reactive reagents and the formation of intermediates and by-products. Low levels of some of these may be present in the final drug substance and drug product as impurities. Such chemically reactive impurities may have at the same time the potential for unwanted toxicities including genotoxicity and carcinogenicity and hence can have an impact on product risk assessment. This paper outlines a procedure for testing, classification, qualification, toxicological risk assessment, and control of impurities possessing genotoxic potential in pharmaceutical products. Referencing accepted principles of cancer risk assessment, this document proposes a staged threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) approach for the intake of genotoxic impurities over various periods of exposure. This staged TTC is based on knowledge about tumorigenic potency of a wide range of genotoxic carcinogens and can be used for genotoxic compounds, for which cancer data are limited or not available. The delineated acceptable daily intake values of between approximately 1.5 microg/day for approximately lifetime intake and approximately 120 microg/day for < or = 1 month are virtually safe doses. Based on sound scientific reasoning, these virtually safe intake values do not pose an unacceptable risk to either human volunteers or patients at any stage of clinical development and marketing of a pharmaceutical product. The intake levels are estimated to give an excess cancer risk of 1 in 100,000 to 1 in a million over a lifetime, and are extremely conservative given the current lifetime cancer risk in the population of over 1 in 4 (http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html.all.html). The proposals in this document apply to all clinical routes of administration and to compounds at all stages of clinical development. It is important to note that certain types of products, such as those for life-threatening indications for which there are no safer alternatives, allow for special considerations using adaptations of the principles outlined in this paper.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16412543     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  17 in total

Review 1.  Generic development of topical dermatologic products: formulation development, process development, and testing of topical dermatologic products.

Authors:  Rong-Kun Chang; Andre Raw; Robert Lionberger; Lawrence Yu
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Highly stereoselective and scalable anti-aldol reactions using N-(p-dodecylphenylsulfonyl)-2-pyrrolidinecarboxamide: scope and origins of stereoselectivities.

Authors:  Hua Yang; Subham Mahapatra; Paul Ha-Yeon Cheong; Rich G Carter
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 4.354

3.  Miniaturized flow cytometric in vitro micronucleus assay represents an efficient tool for comprehensively characterizing genotoxicity dose-response relationships.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Jeffrey C Bemis; Souk Phonethepswath; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Gas-phase meerwein reaction of epoxides with protonated acetonitrile generated by atmospheric pressure ionizations.

Authors:  Lianming Wu; David Q Liu; Alireza S Kord
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  The Threshold of Toxicological Concern for prenatal developmental toxicity in rats and rabbits.

Authors:  B van Ravenzwaay; X Jiang; T Luechtefeld; T Hartung
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.271

6.  Transitioning to composite bacterial mutagenicity models in ICH M7 (Q)SAR analyses.

Authors:  Curran Landry; Marlene T Kim; Naomi L Kruhlak; Kevin P Cross; Roustem Saiakhov; Suman Chakravarti; Lidiya Stavitskaya
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  Genotoxic hazard of radiopharmaceuticals in humans: chemical and radiation aspects coupled to microdosing.

Authors:  H Lundqvist; G Antoni; B Långström
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Determination of residual epichlorohydrin in sevelamer hydrochloride by static headspace gas chromatography with flame ionization detection.

Authors:  Kaliaperumal Karthikeyan; Govindasamy T Arularasu; Perumalsamy Devaraj; Karnam Chandrasekara Pillai
Journal:  Sci Pharm       Date:  2010-09-26

9.  A Sensitive and Simple HPLC-UV Method for Trace Level Quantification of Ethyl p-Toluenesulfonate and Methyl p-Toluenesulfonate, Two Potential Genotoxins in Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients.

Authors:  Amasa Nageswari; Kallam Venkata Siva Rama Krishna Reddy; Khagga Mukkanti
Journal:  Sci Pharm       Date:  2011-09-20

10.  Successful drug development despite adverse preclinical findings part 2: examples.

Authors:  Robert A Ettlin; Junji Kuroda; Stephanie Plassmann; Makoto Hayashi; David E Prentice
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 1.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.