Literature DB >> 16410430

Prostate cancer screening decision making under controversy: implications for health promotion practice.

Clement K Gwede1, Robert J McDermott.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is a major health problem for U.S. men and is characterized by paradoxes and controversies. Despite the wide availability of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test, prostate cancer screening remains a controversial practice mainly because the direct impact of screening on mortality is not yet proven. As the relative value of screening, early detection, and treatment strategies continue to be debated, glaring racial-ethnic disparities persist with African American men experiencing excess morbidity and mortality and demonstrating the lowest screening rates among racial-ethnic groups. Given the prevailing controversy, uncertainty, and known disparities, how can health education messages be framed to assist men and their family members? This article highlights the ethnic disparities, paradoxes, and controversies of prostate cancer and identifies critical challenges and opportunities for health educators and clinical practitioners. Implications for health promotion communications and informed decision making in this era of uncertainty are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16410430     DOI: 10.1177/1524839904263682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Pract        ISSN: 1524-8399


  7 in total

1.  Behind Closed Doors: What Happens when Patients and Providers Talk about Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening?: Survey of the Effects of a Community-Based Intervention.

Authors:  Lauren McCormack; Pamela Williams-Piehota; Carla Bann
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Applicability of a video intervention to increase informed decision making for prostate-specific antigen testing.

Authors:  Levi Ross; Alicestine D Ashford; Sherese J Bleechington; Tyra Dark; Deborah O Erwin
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Plans to stop cancer screening tests among adults who recently considered screening.

Authors:  Carmen L Lewis; Mick P Couper; Carrie A Levin; Michael P Pignone; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Trends in prostate-specific antigen test use, 2000-2005.

Authors:  Louie E Ross; Yhenneko J Taylor; Daniel L Howard
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Using focus groups to adapt ethnically appropriate, information-seeking and recruitment messages for a prostate cancer screening program for men at high risk.

Authors:  Charlene J Bryan; Lindsay Wetmore-Arkader; Tammy Calvano; Janet A Deatrick; Veda N Giri; Deborah Watkins Bruner
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 6.  Interventions to improve decision making and reduce racial and ethnic disparities in the management of prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Saleha Sajid; Ashwin A Kotwal; William Dale
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Knowledge of Prostate Cancer and Screening Among Young Multiethnic Black Men.

Authors:  Motolani E Ogunsanya; Carolyn M Brown; Folakemi T Odedina; Jamie C Barner; Taiwo B Adedipe; Brittany Corbell
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2017-01-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.