Literature DB >> 16409382

Developmental regulation of skull morphology II: ontogenetic dynamics of covariance.

Miriam Leah Zelditch1, Jason Mezey, H David Sheets, Barbara L Lundrigan, Theodore Garland.   

Abstract

Canalization may play a critical role in molding patterns of integration when variability is regulated by the balance between processes that generate and remove variation. Under these conditions, the interaction among those processes may produce a dynamic structure of integration even when the level of variability is constant. To determine whether the constancy of variance in skull shape throughout most of postnatal growth results from a balance between processes generating and removing variation, we compare covariance structures from age to age in two rodent species, cotton rats (Sigmodon fulviventer) and house mice (Mus musculus domesticus). We assess the overall similarity of covariance matrices by the matrix correlation, and compare the structures of covariance matrices using common subspace analysis, a method related to common principal components (PCs) analysis but suited to cases in which variation is so nearly spherical that PCs are ambiguous. We find significant differences from age to age in covariance structure and the more effectively canalized ones tend to be least stable in covariance structure. We find no evidence that canalization gradually and preferentially removes deviations arising early in development as we might expect if canalization results from compensatory differential growth. Our results suggest that (co)variation patterns are continually restructured by processes that equilibrate variance, and thus that canalization plays a critical role in molding patterns of integration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16409382     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2006.05074.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Dev        ISSN: 1520-541X            Impact factor:   1.930


  14 in total

1.  Developmental plasticity in covariance structure of the skull: effects of prenatal stress.

Authors:  Paula N Gonzalez; Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Evelia E Oyhenart
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Physics and the canalization of morphogenesis: a grand challenge in organismal biology.

Authors:  Michelangelo von Dassow; Lance A Davidson
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  If the skull fits: magnetic resonance imaging and microcomputed tomography for combined analysis of brain and skull phenotypes in the mouse.

Authors:  Brian J Nieman; Marissa C Blank; Brian B Roman; R Mark Henkelman; Kathleen J Millen
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.107

4.  Deciphering the Palimpsest: Studying the Relationship Between Morphological Integration and Phenotypic Covariation.

Authors:  Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Heather Jamniczky; Nathan M Young; Campbell Rolian; Trish E Parsons; Julia C Boughner; Ralph S Marcucio
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.119

Review 5.  Studying morphological integration and modularity at multiple levels: concepts and analysis.

Authors:  Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Long-term morphogenetic aftereffects of muskrat acclimatization in Western Siberia.

Authors:  A G Vasil'ev; V N Bol'shakov; N V Sineva
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2014-05-03

7.  Morphometric Variation at Different Spatial Scales: Coordination and Compensation in the Emergence of Organismal Form.

Authors:  Philipp Mitteroecker; Silvester Bartsch; Corinna Erkinger; Nicole D S Grunstra; Anne Le Maître; Fred L Bookstein
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  Divergence of craniofacial developmental trajectories among avian embryos.

Authors:  Francis J Smith; Christopher J Percival; Nathan M Young; Diane Hu; Richard A Schneider; Ralph S Marcucio; Benedikt Hallgrimsson
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.780

9.  A landmark-free framework for the detection and description of shape differences in embryos.

Authors:  S M Rolfe; L G Shapiro; T C Cox; A M Maga; L L Cox
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

10.  Limits of principal components analysis for producing a common trait space: implications for inferring selection, contingency, and chance in evolution.

Authors:  Kevin J Parsons; W James Cooper; R Craig Albertson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.