Literature DB >> 16407480

Auditory processing deficits in dyslexia: task or stimulus related?

Karen Banai1, Merav Ahissar.   

Abstract

The nature of the fundamental deficit underlying reading disability is the subject of a long-standing debate. We previously found that dyslexics with additional learning difficulties (D-LDs) perform poorly in simple auditory tasks. We now tried to determine whether these deficits relate to stimulus or task complexity. We found that the degree of impairment was dependent on task rather than stimulus complexity. D-LDs could adequately detect and identify mild frequency changes in simple pure tones and minimal phonemic changes in complex speech sounds when task required only simple same-different discriminations. However, when task required the identification of the direction of frequency change or the ordinal position of a repeated tonal or speech stimulus, D-LDs' performance substantially deteriorated. This behavioral pattern suggests that D-LDs suffer from a similar type of deficits when processing speech and nonspeech sounds. In both cases, the extent of difficulties is determined by the structure of the task rather than by stimulus composition or complexity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16407480     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhj107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  31 in total

Review 1.  Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning.

Authors:  Merav Ahissar; Mor Nahum; Israel Nelken; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  From comparison to classification: a cortical tool for boosting perception.

Authors:  Mor Nahum; Luba Daikhin; Yedida Lubin; Yamit Cohen; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Separable developmental trajectories for the abilities to detect auditory amplitude and frequency modulation.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Andrew T Sabin; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Detection and identification of monaural and binaural pitch contours in dyslexic listeners.

Authors:  Sébastien Santurette; Hanne Poelmans; Heleen Luts; Pol Ghesquiére; Jan Wouters; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-04-07

5.  Adults with dyslexia are impaired in categorizing speech and nonspeech sounds on the basis of temporal cues.

Authors:  Maaike Vandermosten; Bart Boets; Heleen Luts; Hanne Poelmans; Narly Golestani; Jan Wouters; Pol Ghesquière
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Reading and subcortical auditory function.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Auditory scene analysis in school-aged children with developmental language disorders.

Authors:  E Sussman; M Steinschneider; W Lee; K Lawson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Intensive training in adults refines A1 representations degraded in an early postnatal critical period.

Authors:  Xiaoming Zhou; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Neural substrates related to auditory working memory comparisons in dyslexia: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Tim Conway; Kenneth M Heilman; Kaundinya Gopinath; Kyung Peck; Russell Bauer; Richard W Briggs; Joseph K Torgesen; Bruce Crosson
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.892

10.  Ultra-fine frequency tuning revealed in single neurons of human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Y Bitterman; R Mukamel; R Malach; I Fried; I Nelken
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.