Literature DB >> 16407459

Proceedings of the SMBE Tri-National Young Investigators' Workshop 2005. Accurate inference and estimation in population genomics.

Matthew W Hahn1.   

Abstract

Both intra- and interspecific genomic comparisons have revealed local similarities in the level and frequency of mutational variation, as well as in patterns of gene expression. This autocorrelation between measurements leads to violations of assumptions of independence in many statistical methods, resulting in misleading and incorrect inferences. Here I show that autocorrelation can be due to many factors and is present across the genome. Using a one-dimensional spatial stochastic model, I further show how previous results can be employed to correct for autocorrelation along chromosomes in population and comparative genomics research. When multiple hypothesis tests are autocorrelated, I demonstrate that a simple correction can lead to increased power in statistical inference. I present a preliminary analysis of population genomic data from Drosophila simulans to show the ubiquity of autocorrelation and applicability of the methods proposed here.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16407459     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msj094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  14 in total

1.  Genomics of isolation in hybrids.

Authors:  Zachariah Gompert; Thomas L Parchman; C Alex Buerkle
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Population genetic inference from genomic sequence variation.

Authors:  John E Pool; Ines Hellmann; Jeffrey D Jensen; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Whole-genome nucleotide diversity, recombination, and linkage disequilibrium in the model legume Medicago truncatula.

Authors:  Antoine Branca; Timothy D Paape; Peng Zhou; Roman Briskine; Andrew D Farmer; Joann Mudge; Arvind K Bharti; Jimmy E Woodward; Gregory D May; Laurent Gentzbittel; Cécile Ben; Roxanne Denny; Michael J Sadowsky; Joëlle Ronfort; Thomas Bataillon; Nevin D Young; Peter Tiffin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Conservation of recombination hotspots in yeast.

Authors:  Isheng J Tsai; Austin Burt; Vassiliki Koufopanou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Background Selection Does Not Mimic the Patterns of Genetic Diversity Produced by Selective Sweeps.

Authors:  Daniel R Schrider
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  USING POPULATION GENOMICS TO DETECT SELECTION IN NATURAL POPULATIONS: KEY CONCEPTS AND METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; Patrick C Phillips; William A Cresko
Journal:  Int J Plant Sci       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 1.785

7.  Population genomics: whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  David J Begun; Alisha K Holloway; Kristian Stevens; Ladeana W Hillier; Yu-Ping Poh; Matthew W Hahn; Phillip M Nista; Corbin D Jones; Andrew D Kern; Colin N Dewey; Lior Pachter; Eugene Myers; Charles H Langley
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Local patterns of nucleotide polymorphism are highly variable in the selfing species Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Richard C Moore; M Henry H Stevens
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  "Reverse ecology" and the power of population genomics.

Authors:  Yong Fuga Li; James C Costello; Alisha K Holloway; Matthew W Hahn
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Structural genomics: correlation blocks, population structure, and genome architecture.

Authors:  Xin-Sheng Hu; Francis C Yeh; Zhiquan Wang
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.