Literature DB >> 1640691

Drugs of abuse in saliva: a review.

W Schramm1, R H Smith, P A Craig, D A Kidwell.   

Abstract

There has been substantial interest in the use of saliva as a diagnostic medium for drugs of abuse because it can be obtained noninvasively. Although drugs of abuse have been investigated in saliva for more than a decade, the role of saliva remains uncertain. A clear picture is difficult to obtain because of variations in (1) the analytical methods used; (2) the dose regimen of subjects, which was either unknown or differed between studies; and (3) the elapsed time between drug intake and sample collection. This communication summarizes the studies on the quantitative determination of different drugs of abuse in saliva to elucidate the current status in this area. Marijuana, cocaine, phencyclidine, opiates, barbiturates, amphetamines, and diazepines (or their metabolites) have all been detected in saliva by various analytical methods, including immunoassay, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, and thin layer chromatography. Initial studies with cocaine and phencyclidine suggest a correlation between saliva and plasma concentrations of these drugs, indicating a dynamic equilibrium between saliva and blood. Tetrahydrocannabinol, the active component in marijuana, on the other hand, does not appear to be transferred from plasma to saliva. However, tetrahydrocannabinol is sequestered in the buccal cavity during smoking and can be detected in saliva. These findings point to the potential role of saliva in the analysis of many illicit drugs. To clearly identify the role of saliva as a diagnostic medium for drugs of abuse, research efforts should be directed towards (1) performing systematic studies on correlations between saliva, blood, and urine and (2) determining the concentrations of drugs and their metabolites in saliva as a function of dose and time after intake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1640691     DOI: 10.1093/jat/16.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  10 in total

Review 1.  Interpretation of oral fluid tests for drugs of abuse.

Authors:  Edward J Cone; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Saliva as a diagnostic fluid.

Authors:  D Malamud
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-25

Review 3.  Detection of human immunodeficiency virus antibodies in oral fluids.

Authors:  R L Hodinka; T Nagashunmugam; D Malamud
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  1998-07

4.  Quantitative mass spectrometry of unconventional human biological matrices.

Authors:  Ewelina P Dutkiewicz; Pawel L Urban
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Microfluidic immunoassays as rapid saliva-based clinical diagnostics.

Authors:  Amy E Herr; Anson V Hatch; Daniel J Throckmorton; Huu M Tran; James S Brennan; William V Giannobile; Anup K Singh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Oral fluid as an alternative matrix to monitor opiate and cocaine use in substance-abuse treatment patients.

Authors:  Riet Dams; Robin E Choo; Willy E Lambert; Hendree Jones; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Oral fluids as an alternative to serum for measurement of markers of immune activation.

Authors:  P Nishanian; N Aziz; J Chung; R Detels; J L Fahey
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  1998-07

8.  Concentrations of Morphine and Codeine in Paired Oral Fluid and Urine Specimens Following Ingestion of a Poppy Seed Roll and Raw Poppy Seeds.

Authors:  Kimberly L Samano; Randal E Clouette; Barbara J Rowland; R H Barry Sample
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.367

9.  Total arsenic and speciation analysis of saliva and urine samples from individuals living in a chronic arsenicosis area in China.

Authors:  Dapeng Wang; Yasuyo Shimoda; Sanxiang Wang; Zhenghui Wang; Jian Liu; Xing Liu; Huanyu Jin; Fenfang Gao; Jian Tong; Kenzo Yamanaka; Jie Zhang; Yan An
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.674

10.  Comparison of 3 Derivatization Methods for the Analysis of Amphetamine-Related Drugs in Oral Fluid by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Khaled M Mohamed; Abdulsallam Bakdash
Journal:  Anal Chem Insights       Date:  2017-08-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.