Literature DB >> 16406544

Multifocal visual evoked potential analysis of inflammatory or demyelinating optic neuritis.

Clare L Fraser1, Alexander Klistorner, Stuart L Graham, Raymond Garrick, Francis A Billson, John R Grigg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity of multifocal visual evoked potentials (mVEP) in optic neuritis of an inflammatory or demyelinating nature.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-four patients participated who had a confirmed diagnosis of optic neuritis (ON) (past and acute). Based on the McDonald multiple sclerosis (MS) criteria, 25 patients (27 eyes with ON) were deemed to have isolated optic neuritis and thus not have MS (i.e., the not-MS group), and 19 patients (24 eyes with ON) had a diagnosis of MS (i.e., the MS group). The remaining 20 patients (25 eyes with ON) were at a high risk of MS, but diagnostic evaluation was equivocal, and thus were classified as the possible MS group. A control group of 20 normal patients was enrolled. TESTING: The mVEP test was performed using the Accumap. All ON patients had recent magnetic resonance imaging scans of the brain and spinal cord. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Multifocal visual evoked potentials amplitude and latency values were analyzed within each group and were compared with the normal controls.
RESULTS: No abnormality was recorded on mVEP in the control group. Of all the ON eyes, 74 (97.3%) were abnormal on mVEP testing. Amplitude values were abnormal in 92.6% of not-MS eyes, 92.0% of possible MS eyes, and 100% of those with MS, and latency was abnormal in 33.3%, 76.0%, and 100%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the mVEP latency z-scores among all ON groups (P<0.01; Kruskal-Wallis test). Although distribution graphs of latency z-scores in the not-MS and MS groups had single peaks and were clearly separate from each other, the latency z-score distribution within the possible MS group in postacute patients was bimodal, with each peak corresponding to the distribution of the not-MS and MS group, respectively. The mVEP latency z-scores had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% in detecting patients with ON due to MS when compared with normal patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The mVEP test is a sensitive and specific tool for detecting optic neuritis. There was a significant difference in latency analysis findings between patient groups as classified according to the McDonald MS criteria. Latency results suggest a role in identifying a patient's risk for future MS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16406544     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  20 in total

1.  Multifocal visual evoked responses to dichoptic stimulation using virtual reality goggles: Multifocal VER to dichoptic stimulation.

Authors:  Hemamalini Arvind; Alexander Klistorner; Stuart L Graham; John R Grigg
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Correlation between full-field and multifocal VEPs in optic neuritis.

Authors:  Alexander Klistorner; Clare Fraser; Raymond Garrick; Stuart Graham; Hemamalini Arvind
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Application of multifocal visual evoked potentials in the assessment of visual dysfunction in macular diseases.

Authors:  L Jiang; H Zhang; J Xie; X Jiao; H Zhou; H Ji; T Y Y Lai; N Wang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Exploring the methods of data analysis in multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  L Malmqvist; L De Santiago; C Fraser; A Klistorner; S Hamann
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Assessing visual pathway function in multiple sclerosis patients with multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Michal Laron; Han Cheng; Bin Zhang; Jade S Schiffman; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 6.312

6.  Reproducibility of multifocal visual evoked potential and traditional visual evoked potential in normal and multiple sclerosis eyes.

Authors:  Divya Narayanan; Han Cheng; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Clinical approach to optic neuropathies.

Authors:  Raed Behbehani
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09

Review 8.  Visual electrophysiology in the clinical evaluation of optic neuritis, chiasmal tumours, achiasmia, and ocular albinism: an overview.

Authors:  Jelka Brecelj
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Multifocal VEP and OCT in optic neuritis: a topographical study of the structure-function relationship.

Authors:  Alexander Klistorner; H Arvind; T Nguyen; R Garrick; M Paine; S Graham; J O'Day; C Yiannikas
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Multifocal visual evoked potential in optic neuritis, ischemic optic neuropathy and compressive optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Manju Jayaraman; Rashmin Anilkumar Gandhi; Priya Ravi; Parveen Sen
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.