BACKGROUND: Several studies showed a different symptom structure underlying the spectrum of autistic-like disorders from the behaviour triad as mentioned in the DSM-IV. In the present study, a hypothesised symptom model for autism was constructed, based on earlier explorative findings, and was put to a confirmatory test. METHOD: Items from the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) were used to examine the goodness of fit of the DSM-IV model, the hypothesised symptom model, and two additional models for autism. All models were tested in a group of 255 verbal and nonverbal individuals with minor to severe autistic symptomatology. RESULTS: The DSM-IV model encountered estimation problems. Conversely, the hypothesised symptom model had no such problems and proved to have a better fit to the sample data than the two additional models for autism. However, some of the observed variables were weak indicators of the three latent factors in the model. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesised symptom model appeared to be a plausible model in a group of individuals with a broad range of autistic behaviours and levels of functioning. Nevertheless, the stability of the model needs further examination in a larger group of individuals with disorders in the autism spectrum, and with varying degrees of intellectual functioning.
BACKGROUND: Several studies showed a different symptom structure underlying the spectrum of autistic-like disorders from the behaviour triad as mentioned in the DSM-IV. In the present study, a hypothesised symptom model for autism was constructed, based on earlier explorative findings, and was put to a confirmatory test. METHOD: Items from the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) were used to examine the goodness of fit of the DSM-IV model, the hypothesised symptom model, and two additional models for autism. All models were tested in a group of 255 verbal and nonverbal individuals with minor to severe autistic symptomatology. RESULTS: The DSM-IV model encountered estimation problems. Conversely, the hypothesised symptom model had no such problems and proved to have a better fit to the sample data than the two additional models for autism. However, some of the observed variables were weak indicators of the three latent factors in the model. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesised symptom model appeared to be a plausible model in a group of individuals with a broad range of autistic behaviours and levels of functioning. Nevertheless, the stability of the model needs further examination in a larger group of individuals with disorders in the autism spectrum, and with varying degrees of intellectual functioning.
Authors: Stelios Georgiades; Peter Szatmari; Eric Duku; Lonnie Zwaigenbaum; Susan Bryson; Wendy Roberts; Eric Fombonne; Pat Mirenda; Isabel Smith; Tracy Vaillancourt; Joanne Volden; Charlotte Waddell; Ann Thompson Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2011-10
Authors: Rebecca Grzadzinski; Themba Carr; Costanza Colombi; Kelly McGuire; Sarah Dufek; Andrew Pickles; Catherine Lord Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2016-07
Authors: Annelies de Bildt; Erik J Mulder; Pieter J Hoekstra; Natasja D J van Lang; Ruud B Minderaa; Catharina A Hartman Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2009-06-03