Literature DB >> 16405532

Usefulness of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in the differentiation between malignant and benign lymphadenopathy.

Akira Kanamori1, Yoshiki Hirooka, Akihiro Itoh, Senju Hashimoto, Hiroki Kawashima, Kazuo Hara, Hiroki Uchida, Jun Goto, Naoki Ohmiya, Yasumasa Niwa, Hidemi Goto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is considered the most useful diagnostic modality for regional staging; however, it is still difficult to diagnose lymph node metastasis by EUS images only. In this study, we report the usefulness of contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS) in the evaluation of benign lymph nodes (BLN) or malignant lymph nodes (MLN) based on blood flow patterns. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In the retrospective study, CE-EUS was performed in 46 patients in whom EUS revealed lymph node in the mediastinum or abdominal cavity. The subjects consisted of 22 patients with BLN and 24 patients with MLN. The lesions were examined by EUS, and the maximal and minimal diameters of lymph nodes were measured. Thereafter, the shape and internal echoes were investigated, and the findings were morphologically classified based on Catalano's report. Enhancement effects and the diagnostic capability of CE-EUS were evaluated. In the prospective study, BLNs were differentiated from MLN using the enhancement patterns on CE-EUS based on the results of the retrospective study, and the diagnostic capability was evaluated.
RESULTS: In the retrospective study, there were no significant differences in the maximal diameter and maximal/minimal diameter ratio between MLN and BLN. The morphology was classified into four types. Based on the morphological classification, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rate were 88.2%, 77.3%, and 82.1%, respectively. On CE-EUS, the enhancement pattern was classified into three types. The BLN lesions showed uniform enhancement (19/22). In all patients with MLN, a defect of enhancement was observed (24/24). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rate of CE-EUS were 100%, 86.4%, and 92.3%, respectively. In the prospective study, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rate of CE-EUS were 100%, 81.8%, and 92.0%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: CE-EUS is useful for differentiating BLN from MLN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16405532     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00394.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  26 in total

1.  Contrast enhanced endoscopic ultrasound: More than just a fancy Doppler.

Authors:  Rachid M Mohamed; Brian M Yan
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-07-16

Review 2.  Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  Nischita K Reddy; Ana Maria Ioncică; Adrian Săftoiu; Peter Vilmann; Manoop S Bhutani
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  New ultrasound techniques for lymph node evaluation.

Authors:  Xin-Wu Cui; Christian Jenssen; Adrian Saftoiu; Andre Ignee; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Endoscopic ultrasound advances, part 1: diagnosis.

Authors:  Edward Kim; Jennifer J Telford
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Larger short-axis length of lymph nodes: another predictor for malignant involvement.

Authors:  Mitsunobu Matsushita; Kazushige Uchida; Akiyoshi Nishio; Kazuichi Okazaki
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Endoscopic Ultrasonograpic Findings of Benign Mediastinal and Abdominal Lymphadenopathy Confirmed by EUS-guided Fine Needle Aspiration.

Authors:  Hae Jung Song; Jin-Oh Kim; Soo Hoon Eun; Young Deok Cho; In Seop Jung; Young Koog Cheon; Jong Ho Moon; Joon Seong Lee; Moon Sung Lee; Chan Sup Shim; Boo Sung Kim; So Young Jin
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 4.519

7.  Clinical oncology for pancreatic and biliary cancers: Advances and current limitations.

Authors:  Yoshiki Hirooka; Akihiro Itoh; Hiroki Kawashima; Eizaburo Ohno; Takuya Ishikawa; Yuya Itoh; Yosuke Nakamura; Takeshi Hiramatsu; Masanao Nakamura; Ryoji Miyahara; Naoki Ohmiya; Masatoshi Ishigami; Yoshiaki Katano; Hidemi Goto
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-10

8.  Preliminary study of contrast-enhanced harmonic endosonography with second-generation contrast agents.

Authors:  Masayuki Kitano; Masatoshi Kudo; Hiroki Sakamoto; Tatsuya Nakatani; Kiyoshi Maekawa; Nobuyuki Mizuguchi; Yasuhiro Ito; Motohiro Miki; Uwe Matsui; Tammo von Schrenck
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 1.314

9.  High Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in Malignant Lymph Nodes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Linbin Chen; Yin Li; Xiaoyan Gao; Shiyong Lin; Longjun He; Guangyu Luo; Jianjun Li; Chunyu Huang; Guobao Wang; Qing Yang; Hongbo Shan
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography assessment of gastric cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jian Ang; Liang Hu; Pin-Tong Huang; Jin-Xiu Wu; Ling-Na Huang; Chun-Hui Cao; Yi-Xiong Zheng; Li Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.