Literature DB >> 23323004

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography assessment of gastric cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Jian Ang1, Liang Hu, Pin-Tong Huang, Jin-Xiu Wu, Ling-Na Huang, Chun-Hui Cao, Yi-Xiong Zheng, Li Chen.   

Abstract

AIM: To quantitatively assess the ability of double contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCUS) to detect tumor early response to pre-operative chemotherapy.
METHODS: Forty-three patients with gastric cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative resection between September 2011 and February 2012 were analyzed. Pre-operative chemotherapy regimens of fluorouracil + oxaliplatin or S-1 + oxaliplatin were administered in 2-4 cycles over 6-12 wk periods. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan and DCUS before and after two courses of pre-operative chemotherapy. The therapeutic response was assessed by CT using the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST 1.1) criteria. Tumor area was assessed by DCUS as enhanced appearance of gastric carcinoma due to tumor vascularity during the contrast phase as compared to the normal gastric wall. Histopathologic analysis was carried out according to the Mandard tumor regression grade criteria and used as the reference standard. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy of DCUS parameters in differentiating histopathological responders from non-responders.
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 32 men and 11 women, with mean age of 59.7 ± 11.4 years. Neither age, sex, histologic type, tumor site, T stage, nor N stage was associated with pathological response. The responders had significantly smaller mean tumor size than the non-responders (15.7 ± 7.4 cm vs 33.3 ± 14.1 cm, P < 0.01). According to Mandard's criteria, 27 patients were classified as responders, with 11 (40.7%) showing decreased tumor size by DCUS. In contrast, only three (18.8%) of the 16 non-responders showed decreased tumor size by DCUS (P < 0.01). The area under the ROC curve was 0.64, with a 95%CI of 0.46-0.81. The effects of several cut-off points on diagnostic parameters were calculated in the ROC curve analysis. By maximizing Youden's index (sensitivity + specificity - 1), the best cut-off point for distinguishing responders from non-responders was determined, which had optimal sensitivity of 62.9% and specificity of 56.3%. Using this cut-off point, the positive and negative predictive values of DCUS for distinguishing responders from non-responders were 70.8% and 47.4%, respectively. The overall accuracy of DCUS for therapeutic response assessment was 60.5%, slightly higher than the 53.5% for CT response assessment with RECIST criteria (P = 0.663). Although the advantage was not statistically significant, likely due to the small number of cases assessed. DCUS was able to identify decreased perfusion in responders who showed no morphological change by CT imaging, which can be occluded by such treatment effects as fibrosis and edema.
CONCLUSION: DCUS may represent an innovative tool for more accurately predicting histopathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgical resection in patients with locally-advanced gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Disease management; Gastric cancer; Predictive value of tests; Ultrasonic imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23323004      PMCID: PMC3531690          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i47.7026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  26 in total

1.  Early quantitative evaluation of a tumor vasculature disruptive agent AVE8062 using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Authors:  Sonia Lavisse; Pascale Lejeune; Valérie Rouffiac; Nicolas Elie; Estelle Bribes; Brigitte Demers; Patricia Vrignaud; Marie-Christine Bissery; Aude Brulé; Serge Koscielny; Pierre Péronneau; Nathalie Lassau
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Contrast-enhanced gray-scale ultrasound for quantitative evaluation of tumor response to chemotherapy: preliminary results with a mouse hepatoma model.

Authors:  Jian-Hua Zhou; Long-Hui Cao; Wei Zheng; Min Liu; Feng Han; An-Hua Li
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer: a comparison to endoscopic ultrasonography with respect to histopathology.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Zheng; Yaojun Yu; Mingdong Lu; Weijian Sun; Feihai Wang; Pihong Li; Yi Zhang; Limiao Lin; Pingtong Huang; Jianming Chen; Haiyan Zhang; Zuokai Xie; Xiang Da Eric Dong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  Imaging angiogenesis: applications and potential for drug development.

Authors:  Janet C Miller; Homer H Pien; Dushyant Sahani; A Gregory Sorensen; James H Thrall
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Blood flow changes in hepatocellular carcinoma after the administration of thalidomide assessed by reperfusion kinetics during microbubble infusion: preliminary results.

Authors:  Michele Bertolotto; Gabriele Pozzato; Lory Saveria Crocè; Fabiana Nascimben; Cristiana Gasparini; Maria Assunta Cova; Claudio Tiribelli
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy best predicts survival after curative resection of gastric cancer.

Authors:  A M Lowy; P F Mansfield; S D Leach; R Pazdur; P Dumas; J A Ajani
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Imaging techniques to evaluate the response to treatment in oncology: current standards and perspectives.

Authors:  C D Marcus; V Ladam-Marcus; C Cucu; O Bouché; L Lucas; C Hoeffel
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 6.312

8.  Prognostic significance of histopathological tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Rupert Langer; Katja Ott; Marcus Feith; Florian Lordick; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert; Karen Becker
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Sequential FDG-PET and induction chemotherapy in locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the Oesophago-gastric junction (AEG): the Heidelberg Imaging program in Cancer of the oesophago-gastric junction during Neoadjuvant treatment: HICON trial.

Authors:  Sylvie Lorenzen; Carl von Gall; Annika Stange; Georg M Haag; Jürgen Weitz; Uwe Haberkorn; Florian Lordick; Wilko Weichert; Ulrich Abel; Jürgen Debus; Dirk Jäger; Marc W Münter
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  A phase II study of biweekly oxaliplatin plus infusional 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (FOLFOX-4) as first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  F De Vita; M Orditura; E Matano; R Bianco; C Carlomagno; S Infusino; V Damiano; E Simeone; M R Diadema; E Lieto; P Castellano; S Pepe; S De Placido; G Galizia; N Di Martino; F Ciardiello; G Catalano; A R Bianco
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  13 in total

1.  Efficacy of docetaxel combined with oxaliplatin and fluorouracil against stage III/IV gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yao-Jun Yu; Wei-Jian Sun; Ming-Dong Lu; Fei-Hai Wang; Dan-Si Qi; Yi Zhang; Pi-Hong Li; He Huang; Tao You; Zhi-Qiang Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Role of imaging in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Robert Michael Kwee; Thomas Christian Kwee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Parametric contrast-enhanced ultrasound as an early predictor of radiation-based therapeutic response for lymph node metastases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhimin Ye; Pintong Huang; Xiaofeng Zhou; Qian Huang; Qiongge Hu; Yongjie Shui; Li Shen; Enyin Lai; Qichun Wei
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-27

4.  Prediction of T stage in gastric carcinoma by enhanced CT and oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Authors:  Tao Yu; Xinling Wang; Zilong Zhao; Fan Liu; Xiaoting Liu; Yan Zhao; Yahong Luo
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 5.  Approaches and genetic determinants in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jichun Zhou; Jianguo Shen; Benjamin J Seifer; Shaojie Jiang; Ji Wang; Hanchu Xiong; Lingmin Xie; Linbo Wang; Xinbing Sui
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-02

6.  CT-based radiomics scores predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kai-Yu Sun; Hang-Tong Hu; Shu-Ling Chen; Jin-Ning Ye; Guang-Hua Li; Li-Da Chen; Jian-Jun Peng; Shi-Ting Feng; Yu-Jie Yuan; Xun Hou; Hui Wu; Xin Li; Ting-Fan Wu; Wei Wang; Jian-Bo Xu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of Gastric Cancer: Correlation with Perfusion CT and Histopathology.

Authors:  Ijin Joo; Se Hyung Kim; Dong Ho Lee; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 8.  The Sensitivity Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Juan Sun; Xianze Wang; Zimu Zhang; Ziyang Zeng; Siwen Ouyang; Weiming Kang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Current status and future perspectives on neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sheng Ao; Yuchen Wang; Qingzhi Song; Yingjiang Ye; Guoqing Lyu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  New utility of an old marker: serum low-density lipoprotein predicts histopathological response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ji-Chun Zhou; Ju-Feng Guo; Rong-Yue Teng; Qin-Chuan Wang; Ji Wang; Qun Wei; Zi-Duo Li; Jian-Guo Shen; Lin-Bo Wang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.