OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated validity and reliability of automated median and ulnar sensory nerve conduction study (NCS) measurements by the NC-stat. METHODS: Median and ulnar distal sensory latencies (DSL) and amplitudes (SNAP) were measured in sixty subjects with the NC-stat and by a neurologist (reference) using traditional instrumentation. The median-ulnar DSL differences (MUD) was calculated. Validity was quantified by the Pearson correlation. Reliability was evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, and inter-rater agreement of MUD abnormalities. RESULTS: As a result of differences in electrode placement, NC-stat and reference mean values had systematic differences. The correlation ranged from 0.70 (ulnar DSL) to 0.91 (median DSL). The ICC ranged from 0.69 (ulnar DSL) to 0.91 (median DSL). In Bland-Altman analysis of DSLs, NC-stat measurements had a bias of 0.56 ms (median) and 0.31 ms (ulnar) and precision of 0.31 and 0.30 ms. Inter-rater agreement for MUD abnormalities was 93.8% (raw) and 0.80 (Kappa). CONCLUSIONS: NC-stat validity and reliability metrics were similar to traditional NCS. Use of the NC-stat would require applicable reference ranges. SIGNIFICANCE: NC-stat median and ulnar NCS are valid and reliable. This device may be useful for increasing availability of NCS when clinically appropriate.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated validity and reliability of automated median and ulnar sensory nerve conduction study (NCS) measurements by the NC-stat. METHODS: Median and ulnar distal sensory latencies (DSL) and amplitudes (SNAP) were measured in sixty subjects with the NC-stat and by a neurologist (reference) using traditional instrumentation. The median-ulnar DSL differences (MUD) was calculated. Validity was quantified by the Pearson correlation. Reliability was evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, and inter-rater agreement of MUD abnormalities. RESULTS: As a result of differences in electrode placement, NC-stat and reference mean values had systematic differences. The correlation ranged from 0.70 (ulnar DSL) to 0.91 (median DSL). The ICC ranged from 0.69 (ulnar DSL) to 0.91 (median DSL). In Bland-Altman analysis of DSLs, NC-stat measurements had a bias of 0.56 ms (median) and 0.31 ms (ulnar) and precision of 0.31 and 0.30 ms. Inter-rater agreement for MUD abnormalities was 93.8% (raw) and 0.80 (Kappa). CONCLUSIONS: NC-stat validity and reliability metrics were similar to traditional NCS. Use of the NC-stat would require applicable reference ranges. SIGNIFICANCE: NC-stat median and ulnar NCS are valid and reliable. This device may be useful for increasing availability of NCS when clinically appropriate.
Authors: N Papanas; G Trypsianis; G Giassakis; K Vadikolias; D Christakidis; H Piperidou; G Efstratiadis; E Maltezos Journal: Hippokratia Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 0.471
Authors: Ryan P Calfee; Ann Marie Dale; Daniel Ryan; Alexis Descatha; Alfred Franzblau; Bradley Evanoff Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: Ann Marie Dale; Bethany T Gardner; Angelique Zeringue; Robert Werner; Alfred Franzblau; Bradley Evanoff Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Ann Marie Dale; Carisa Harris-Adamson; David Rempel; Fred Gerr; Kurt Hegmann; Barbara Silverstein; Susan Burt; Arun Garg; Jay Kapellusch; Linda Merlino; Matthew S Thiese; Ellen A Eisen; Bradley Evanoff Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 5.024