OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to: (i) describe the phenomenology of youths diagnosed with subsyndromal bipolar disorders; (ii) describe the phenomenology of youngsters who are the children of bipolar parents, who are also experiencing subsyndromal symptoms of bipolar disorder (patients with 'cyclotaxia'); and (iii) explore which symptoms may be most useful in identifying youths with cyclotaxia. METHODS: Four hundred outpatients between the ages of 5 and 17 years received a diagnostic assessment and psychometric questionnaires pertaining to mood symptomatology and psychosocial functioning. Parental diagnostic information was also obtained. Children and adolescents were assigned to one of three diagnostic groups: a 'syndromal bipolar disorder (BP)' group (n = 118), a 'sub-syndromal bipolar (SUB-BP)' group (n = 75), or a 'non-bipolar (NON-BP)' group (n = 207). In addition, based on parental diagnoses, youths were assigned to either a high genetic risk group (n = 167) or a low genetic risk group (n = 233). RESULTS: Youths with subsyndromal bipolar disorders were found to have intermediate degrees of manic symptoms than youths with bipolar disorder and youths without a bipolar diagnosis. Offspring of parents having a bipolar disorder were more likely to show symptoms of hypomania and mania than youths without a bipolar parent. Youths at genetic risk for developing a bipolar disorder were not found to be at higher risk for having a diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder or a disruptive behavior disorder. Finally, results suggest that elevated mood with irritability and rapid mood fluctuations are the key distinguishing characteristics of 'cyclotaxia'. CONCLUSIONS: There exists a group of youngsters who are the offspring of a parent/parents with a bipolar disorder who do not suffer from BP 1 or BP 2, yet have elevated mood symptoms and psychosocial dysfunction. As a result of these observations, treatment studies are needed for youths with 'cyclotaxia'.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to: (i) describe the phenomenology of youths diagnosed with subsyndromal bipolar disorders; (ii) describe the phenomenology of youngsters who are the children of bipolar parents, who are also experiencing subsyndromal symptoms of bipolar disorder (patients with 'cyclotaxia'); and (iii) explore which symptoms may be most useful in identifying youths with cyclotaxia. METHODS: Four hundred outpatients between the ages of 5 and 17 years received a diagnostic assessment and psychometric questionnaires pertaining to mood symptomatology and psychosocial functioning. Parental diagnostic information was also obtained. Children and adolescents were assigned to one of three diagnostic groups: a 'syndromal bipolar disorder (BP)' group (n = 118), a 'sub-syndromal bipolar (SUB-BP)' group (n = 75), or a 'non-bipolar (NON-BP)' group (n = 207). In addition, based on parental diagnoses, youths were assigned to either a high genetic risk group (n = 167) or a low genetic risk group (n = 233). RESULTS: Youths with subsyndromal bipolar disorders were found to have intermediate degrees of manic symptoms than youths with bipolar disorder and youths without a bipolar diagnosis. Offspring of parents having a bipolar disorder were more likely to show symptoms of hypomania and mania than youths without a bipolar parent. Youths at genetic risk for developing a bipolar disorder were not found to be at higher risk for having a diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder or a disruptive behavior disorder. Finally, results suggest that elevated mood with irritability and rapid mood fluctuations are the key distinguishing characteristics of 'cyclotaxia'. CONCLUSIONS: There exists a group of youngsters who are the offspring of a parent/parents with a bipolar disorder who do not suffer from BP 1 or BP 2, yet have elevated mood symptoms and psychosocial dysfunction. As a result of these observations, treatment studies are needed for youths with 'cyclotaxia'.
Authors: David J Miklowitz; Christopher D Schneck; Patricia D Walshaw; Amy S Garrett; Manpreet K Singh; Catherine A Sugar; Kiki D Chang Journal: Early Interv Psychiatry Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 2.732
Authors: Mani N Pavuluri; James A Ellis; Ezra Wegbreit; Alessandra M Passarotti; Michael C Stevens Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2011-10-08 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Sarah McCue Horwitz; Christine A Demeter; Maria E Pagano; Eric A Youngstrom; Mary A Fristad; L Eugene Arnold; Boris Birmaher; Mary Kay Gill; David Axelson; Robert A Kowatch; Thomas W Frazier; Robert L Findling Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2010-10-05 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Christoph U Correll; Doreen M Olvet; Andrea M Auther; Marta Hauser; Taishiro Kishimoto; Ricardo E Carrión; Stephanie Snyder; Barbara A Cornblatt Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Carrie A H Vaudreuil; Stephen V Faraone; Maura Di Salvo; Janet R Wozniak; Rebecca A Wolenski; Nicholas W Carrellas; Joseph Biederman Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Danella Hafeman; David Axelson; Christine Demeter; Robert L Findling; Mary A Fristad; Robert A Kowatch; Eric A Youngstrom; Sarah McCue Horwitz; L Eugene Arnold; Thomas W Frazier; Neal Ryan; Mary Kay Gill; Jessica C Hauser-Harrington; Judith Depew; Brieana M Rowles; Boris Birmaher Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2013-03-25 Impact factor: 6.744