Literature DB >> 16402894

Randomized sequence databases for tandem mass spectrometry peptide and protein identification.

Roger Higdon1, Jason M Hogan, Gerald Van Belle, Eugene Kolker.   

Abstract

Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) combined with database searching is currently the most widely used method for high-throughput peptide and protein identification. Many different algorithms, scoring criteria, and statistical models have been used to identify peptides and proteins in complex biological samples, and many studies, including our own, describe the accuracy of these identifications, using at best generic terms such as "high confidence." False positive identification rates for these criteria can vary substantially with changing organisms under study, growth conditions, sequence databases, experimental protocols, and instrumentation; therefore, study-specific methods are needed to estimate the accuracy (false positive rates) of these peptide and protein identifications. We present and evaluate methods for estimating false positive identification rates based on searches of randomized databases (reversed and reshuffled). We examine the use of separate searches of a forward then a randomized database and combined searches of a randomized database appended to a forward sequence database. Estimated error rates from randomized database searches are first compared against actual error rates from MS/MS runs of known protein standards. These methods are then applied to biological samples of the model microorganism Shewanella oneidensis strain MR-1. Based on the results obtained in this study, we recommend the use of use of combined searches of a reshuffled database appended to a forward sequence database as a means providing quantitative estimates of false positive identification rates of peptides and proteins. This will allow researchers to set criteria and thresholds to achieve a desired error rate and provide the scientific community with direct and quantifiable measures of peptide and protein identification accuracy as opposed to vague assessments such as "high confidence."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16402894     DOI: 10.1089/omi.2005.9.364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  OMICS        ISSN: 1536-2310


  28 in total

1.  Identification of best indicators of peptide-spectrum match using a permutation resampling approach.

Authors:  Malik N Akhtar; Bruce R Southey; Per E Andrén; Jonathan V Sweedler; Sandra L Rodriguez-Zas
Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.122

2.  Protein turnover quantification in a multilabeling approach: from data calculation to evaluation.

Authors:  Christian Trötschel; Stefan P Albaum; Daniel Wolff; Simon Schröder; Alexander Goesmann; Tim W Nattkemper; Ansgar Poetsch
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Mutations in mitochondrial complex III uniquely affect complex I in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Wichit Suthammarak; Phil G Morgan; Margaret M Sedensky
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Meta-analysis for protein identification: a case study on yeast data.

Authors:  Roger Higdon; Winston Haynes; Eugene Kolker
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2010-06

5.  Prediction of error associated with false-positive rate determination for peptide identification in large-scale proteomics experiments using a combined reverse and forward peptide sequence database strategy.

Authors:  Edward L Huttlin; Adrian D Hegeman; Amy C Harms; Michael R Sussman
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  MyriMatch: highly accurate tandem mass spectral peptide identification by multivariate hypergeometric analysis.

Authors:  David L Tabb; Christopher G Fernando; Matthew C Chambers
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Verification of automated peptide identifications from proteomic tandem mass spectra.

Authors:  David L Tabb; David B Friedman; Amy-Joan L Ham
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 8.  What's driving false discovery rates?

Authors:  David L Tabb
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  A ranking-based scoring function for peptide-spectrum matches.

Authors:  Ari M Frank
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Staphylococcus aureus elicits marked alterations in the airway proteome during early pneumonia.

Authors:  Christy L Ventura; Roger Higdon; Laura Hohmann; Daniel Martin; Eugene Kolker; H Denny Liggitt; Shawn J Skerrett; Craig E Rubens
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 3.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.