Literature DB >> 16402875

Differential association of family subsystem negativity on siblings' maladjustment: using behavior genetic methods to test process theory.

Mark E Feinberg1, David Reiss, Jenae M Neiderhiser, E Mavis Hetherington.   

Abstract

This study investigated the family context of adolescent sibling similarity and differentiation in maladjustment (antisocial behavior and depression) by examining negativity in different subsystems. Two hypotheses were proposed: (1) Parental and sibling negativity tends to diffuse through the family system, especially because of the high level of reciprocity in sibling relationships, leading to sibling similarity; and (2) interparental (coparenting) conflict disrupts cohesive functioning and thereby motivates and facilitates sibling differentiation and niche picking. To control for the effects of similar genes between siblings, the authors used behavioral genetic models with a genetically informed sample of 720 two-parent families, each with at least 2 adolescent siblings. Results for the differences in shared environmental influences across groups high and low in each of the domains of family negativity provided partial support for the hypotheses. The results further understanding of influences on individual differences and support a theory of how parent-child and interparental relationships intersect with sibling relationship dynamics. Copyright 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16402875     DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.19.4.601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Psychol        ISSN: 0893-3200


  9 in total

1.  Nurture net of nature: Re-evaluating the role of shared environments in academic achievement and verbal intelligence.

Authors:  Jonathan Daw; Guang Guo; Kathie Mullan Harris
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2015-03-14

2.  A longitudinal investigation of the affective environment in families with young children: from infancy to early school age.

Authors:  Robin A Barry; Grazyna Kochanska
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2010-04

3.  Utilising Genetically-Informed Research Designs to Better Understand Family Processes and Child Development: Implications for Adoption and Foster Care Focused Interventions.

Authors:  R Sellers; A F Smith; L D Leve; E Nixon; T Cane; J A Cassell; G T Harold
Journal:  Adopt Foster       Date:  2019-09-26

4.  Etiological contributions to the covariation between children's perceptions of inter-parental conflict and child behavioral problems.

Authors:  Molly Nikolas; Kelly L Klump; S Alexandra Burt
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2013-02

5.  Enhancing coparenting, parenting, and child self-regulation: effects of family foundations 1 year after birth.

Authors:  Mark E Feinberg; Marni L Kan; Megan C Goslin
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2009-09

6.  Establishing family foundations: intervention effects on coparenting, parent/infant well-being, and parent-child relations.

Authors:  Mark E Feinberg; Marni L Kan
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2008-04

7.  Four factors for the initiation of substance use by young adulthood: a 10-year follow-up twin and sibling study of marital conflict, monitoring, siblings, and peers.

Authors:  Jenae M Neiderhiser; Kristine Marceau; David Reiss
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2013-02

8.  Aggressive behavior between siblings and the development of externalizing problems: evidence from a genetically sensitive study.

Authors:  Misaki N Natsuaki; Xiaojia Ge; David Reiss; Jenae M Neiderhiser
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2009-07

Review 9.  How Can Genetically Informed Research Help Inform the Next Generation of Interparental and Parenting Interventions?

Authors:  Gordon T Harold; Leslie D Leve; Ruth Sellers
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2017-02-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.