Literature DB >> 16402365

The PTEN gene in locally progressive prostate cancer is preferentially inactivated by bi-allelic gene deletion.

P C M S Verhagen1, P W van Duijn, K G L Hermans, L H J Looijenga, R J H L M van Gurp, H Stoop, T H van der Kwast, J Trapman.   

Abstract

PTEN is frequently inactivated during the development of many cancers, including prostate cancer, and both bi-allelic and mono-allelic PTEN inactivation may contribute to tumorigenesis. PTEN mutations in clinical cancer specimens can easily be recorded but mono- or bi-allelic gene deletions are often difficult to assess. We performed a comprehensive study to detect PTEN inactivation in 40 locally progressive clinical prostate cancer specimens obtained by transurethral resection of the prostate, utilizing a variety of complementary technical approaches. The methods to detect PTEN deletion included allelotype analysis, dual-colour FISH and array-based CGH. We also applied a novel semi-quantitative approach, assessing the PTEN-WT (wild-type): PTEN-Psi (pseudogene) ratio (WPR). Structural analysis of PTEN was performed by single-strand conformational polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) and sequencing. PTEN protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Our data predict complete PTEN inactivation in 12 samples (30%), nine of these by bi-allelic deletion. Loss of one PTEN copy was also detected by several methodologies but the number could not be accurately assessed. Immunohistochemistry indicated the absence of PTEN protein in 15 samples, and heterogeneous expression of the protein in eight tumours. Taken together, these data show that bi-allelic deletion is a major mechanism of PTEN inactivation in locally progressive prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16402365     DOI: 10.1002/path.1929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  36 in total

1.  Germ-line sequence variants of PTEN do not have an important role in hereditary and non-hereditary prostate cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Chunmei C Xie; Lingyi Lu; Jielin Sun; S Lilly Zheng; William B Isaacs; Henrik Gronberg; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.172

2.  In prostate cancer needle biopsies, detections of PTEN loss by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and by immunohistochemistry (IHC) are concordant and show consistent association with upgrading.

Authors:  C G Picanço-Albuquerque; C L Morais; F L F Carvalho; S B Peskoe; J L Hicks; O Ludkovski; T Vidotto; H Fedor; E Humphreys; M Han; E A Platz; A M De Marzo; D M Berman; T L Lotan; J A Squire
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  PTEN loss and ERG protein expression are infrequent in prostatic ductal adenocarcinomas and concurrent acinar carcinomas.

Authors:  Carlos L Morais; Mehsati Herawi; Antoun Toubaji; Roula Albadine; Jessica Hicks; George J Netto; Angelo M De Marzo; Jonathan I Epstein; Tamara L Lotan
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.104

4.  Germline BRCA mutation does not prevent response to taxane-based therapy for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  David J Gallagher; Angel M Cronin; Matthew I Milowsky; Michael J Morris; Jasmine Bhatia; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Kenneth Offit; Mark E Robson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 5.  Clinical implications of PTEN loss in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tamara Jamaspishvili; David M Berman; Ashley E Ross; Howard I Scher; Angelo M De Marzo; Jeremy A Squire; Tamara L Lotan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  PTEN genomic deletion defines favorable prognostic biomarkers in localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Bo Dai
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

7.  Aberrant microRNA expression likely controls RAS oncogene activation during malignant transformation of human prostate epithelial and stem cells by arsenic.

Authors:  Ntube N O Ngalame; Erik J Tokar; Rachel J Person; Yuanyuan Xu; Michael P Waalkes
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  E17K substitution in AKT1 in prostate cancer.

Authors:  J L Boormans; H Korsten; A C J Ziel-van der Made; G J L H van Leenders; P C M S Verhagen; J Trapman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  PTEN Loss as Determined by Clinical-grade Immunohistochemistry Assay Is Associated with Worse Recurrence-free Survival in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Tamara L Lotan; Wei Wei; Carlos L Morais; Sarah T Hawley; Ladan Fazli; Antonio Hurtado-Coll; Dean Troyer; Jesse K McKenney; Jeffrey Simko; Peter R Carroll; Martin Gleave; Raymond Lance; Daniel W Lin; Peter S Nelson; Ian M Thompson; Lawrence D True; Ziding Feng; James D Brooks
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2016-06

10.  Molecular characterisation of ERG, ETV1 and PTEN gene loci identifies patients at low and high risk of death from prostate cancer.

Authors:  A H M Reid; G Attard; L Ambroisine; G Fisher; G Kovacs; D Brewer; J Clark; P Flohr; S Edwards; D M Berney; C S Foster; A Fletcher; W L Gerald; H Møller; V E Reuter; P T Scardino; J Cuzick; J S de Bono; C S Cooper
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.