Literature DB >> 26861919

In prostate cancer needle biopsies, detections of PTEN loss by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and by immunohistochemistry (IHC) are concordant and show consistent association with upgrading.

C G Picanço-Albuquerque1, C L Morais2, F L F Carvalho2, S B Peskoe3, J L Hicks2, O Ludkovski4, T Vidotto1, H Fedor2, E Humphreys5, M Han5, E A Platz3,5,6, A M De Marzo2,5,6, D M Berman2,4,5, T L Lotan2,6, J A Squire7,8,9.   

Abstract

The prognostic value of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) loss in prostate cancer has primarily been evaluated by either fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or immunohistochemistry (IHC). Previously, we found that PTEN loss by IHC was associated with increased risk of upgrading from biopsy (Gleason 3 + 3) to prostatectomy (Gleason 7+). Now, using an evaluable subset of 111 patients with adjacent biopsy sections, we analyzed the association between PTEN deletion in cancer and the odds of upgrading by a highly sensitive and specific four-color FISH assay. We also compared the concordance of PTEN loss by IHC and PTEN deletion by FISH. PTEN deletion was found in 27 % (12/45) of upgraded cases compared with 11 % (7/66) of controls (P = 0.03). Cancers with PTEN deletions were more likely to be upgraded than those without deletions (adjusting for age odds ratio = 3.40, 95 % confidence interval 1.14-10.11). With respect to concordance, of 93 biopsies with PTEN protein detected by IHC, 89 (96 %) had no PTEN deletion by FISH, and of 18 biopsies without PTEN protein by IHC, 15 had homozygous or hemizygous PTEN deletion by FISH. Only 4 biopsies of the 93 (4 %) with PTEN protein intact had PTEN deletion by FISH. When the regions of uncertainty in these biopsies were systematically studied by FISH, intra-tumoral variation of PTEN deletion was found, which could account for variation in immunoreactivity. Thus, FISH provides a different approach to determining PTEN loss when IHC is uncertain. Both FISH and IHC are concordant, showing consistent positive associations between PTEN loss and upgrading.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gleason upgrade; Hemizygous and homozygous genomic deletion; Prognostic biomarker assay; Tumor suppressor gene

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26861919     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-016-1904-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  24 in total

Review 1.  The functions and regulation of the PTEN tumour suppressor.

Authors:  Min Sup Song; Leonardo Salmena; Pier Paolo Pandolfi
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Heterogeneity and chronology of PTEN deletion and ERG fusion in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Antje Krohn; Fabian Freudenthaler; Silvia Harasimowicz; Martina Kluth; Sarah Fuchs; Lia Burkhardt; Phillip Stahl; Maria C Tsourlakis; Melanie Bauer; Pierre Tennstedt; Markus Graefen; Stefan Steurer; Hueseyin Sirma; Guido Sauter; Thorsten Schlomm; Ronald Simon; Sarah Minner
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 3.  FISH analysis for the detection of lymphoma-associated chromosomal abnormalities in routine paraffin-embedded tissue.

Authors:  Roland A Ventura; Jose I Martin-Subero; Margaret Jones; Joanna McParland; Stefan Gesk; David Y Mason; Reiner Siebert
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Genomic deletion of PTEN is associated with tumor progression and early PSA recurrence in ERG fusion-positive and fusion-negative prostate cancer.

Authors:  Antje Krohn; Tobias Diedler; Lia Burkhardt; Pascale-Sophie Mayer; Colin De Silva; Marie Meyer-Kornblum; Darja Kötschau; Pierre Tennstedt; Joseph Huang; Clarissa Gerhäuser; Malte Mader; Stefan Kurtz; Hüseyin Sirma; Fred Saad; Thomas Steuber; Markus Graefen; Christoph Plass; Guido Sauter; Ronald Simon; Sarah Minner; Thorsten Schlomm
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 5.  Genomic Predictors of Outcome in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Peter J Boström; Anders S Bjartell; James W F Catto; Scott E Eggener; Hans Lilja; Stacy Loeb; Jack Schalken; Thorsten Schlomm; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  PTEN genomic deletion is associated with p-Akt and AR signalling in poorer outcome, hormone refractory prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kanishka Sircar; Maisa Yoshimoto; Federico A Monzon; Ismael H Koumakpayi; Ruth L Katz; Abha Khanna; Karla Alvarez; Guanyong Chen; Andrew D Darnel; Armen G Aprikian; Fred Saad; Tarek A Bismar; Jeremy A Squire
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 7.996

7.  Assessing the order of critical alterations in prostate cancer development and progression by IHC: further evidence that PTEN loss occurs subsequent to ERG gene fusion.

Authors:  B Gumuskaya; B Gurel; H Fedor; H-L Tan; C A Weier; J L Hicks; M C Haffner; T L Lotan; A M De Marzo
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 5.554

8.  Molecular characterisation of ERG, ETV1 and PTEN gene loci identifies patients at low and high risk of death from prostate cancer.

Authors:  A H M Reid; G Attard; L Ambroisine; G Fisher; G Kovacs; D Brewer; J Clark; P Flohr; S Edwards; D M Berney; C S Foster; A Fletcher; W L Gerald; H Møller; V E Reuter; P T Scardino; J Cuzick; J S de Bono; C S Cooper
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Prognostic value of PTEN loss in men with conservatively managed localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  J Cuzick; Z H Yang; G Fisher; E Tikishvili; S Stone; J S Lanchbury; N Camacho; S Merson; D Brewer; C S Cooper; J Clark; D M Berney; H Møller; P Scardino; Z Sangale
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  FISH analysis of 107 prostate cancers shows that PTEN genomic deletion is associated with poor clinical outcome.

Authors:  M Yoshimoto; I W Cunha; R A Coudry; F P Fonseca; C H Torres; F A Soares; J A Squire
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  Reduced immunohistochemical PTEN staining is associated with higher progression rate and recurrence episodes in non-invasive low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Ibrahim Kulac; Sehbal Arslankoz; George J Netto; Dilek Ertoy Baydar
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Clinical implications of PTEN loss in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tamara Jamaspishvili; David M Berman; Ashley E Ross; Howard I Scher; Angelo M De Marzo; Jeremy A Squire; Tamara L Lotan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer Through Quantitative Assessment of PTEN Loss (qPTEN).

Authors:  Tamara Jamaspishvili; Palak G Patel; Yi Niu; Thiago Vidotto; Isabelle Caven; Rachel Livergant; Winnie Fu; Atsunari Kawashima; Nathan How; John B Okello; Liana B Guedes; Veronique Ouellet; Clarissa Picanço; Madhuri Koti; Rodolfo B Reis; Fred Saad; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Tamara L Lotan; Jeremy A Squire; Yingwei P Peng; D Robert Siemens; David M Berman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Distinct subtypes of genomic PTEN deletion size influence the landscape of aneuploidy and outcome in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thiago Vidotto; Daniel Guimarães Tiezzi; Jeremy A Squire
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  ERG overexpression plus SLC45A3 (prostein) and PTEN expression loss: Strong association of the triple hit phenotype with an aggressive pathway of prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Silvia Hernández-Llodrà; Nuria Juanpere; Silvia de Muga; Marta Lorenzo; Joan Gil; Alba Font-Tello; Laia Agell; Raquel Albero-González; Laura Segalés; José Merino; Laia Serrano; Lluís Fumadó; Lluís Cecchini; Josep Lloreta-Trull
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-26

6.  Identifying small molecule probes of ENTPD5 through high throughput screening.

Authors:  Matthew A Durst; Kiira Ratia; Arnon Lavie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  E-Cadherin, Integrin Alpha2 (Cd49b), and Transferrin Receptor-1 (Tfr1) Are Promising Immunohistochemical Markers of Selected Adverse Pathological Features in Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Piotr Zapała; Łukasz Fus; Zbigniew Lewandowski; Karolina Garbas; Łukasz Zapała; Barbara Górnicka; Piotr Radziszewski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  PTEN loss detection in prostate cancer: comparison of PTEN immunohistochemistry and PTEN FISH in a large retrospective prostatectomy cohort.

Authors:  Tamara L Lotan; Asmus Heumann; Sebastian Dwertmann Rico; Jessica Hicks; Kristen Lecksell; Christina Koop; Guido Sauter; Thorsten Schlomm; Ronald Simon
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-10

Review 9.  The PTEN Conundrum: How to Target PTEN-Deficient Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel J Turnham; Nicholas Bullock; Manisha S Dass; John N Staffurth; Helen B Pearson
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 6.600

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.