Literature DB >> 16401339

MIAME/Plant - adding value to plant microarrray experiments.

Philip Zimmermann1, Beatrice Schildknecht, David Craigon, Margarita Garcia-Hernandez, Wilhelm Gruissem, Sean May, Gaurab Mukherjee, Helen Parkinson, Seung Rhee, Ulrich Wagner, Lars Hennig.   

Abstract

Appropriate biological interpretation of microarray data calls for relevant experimental annotation. The widely accepted MIAME guidelines provide a generic, organism-independant standard for minimal information about microarray experiments. In its overall structure, MIAME is very general and specifications cover mostly technical aspects, while relevant organism-specific information useful to understand the underlying experiments is largely missing. If plant biologists want to use results from published microarray experiments, they need detailed information about biological aspects, such as growth conditions, harvesting time or harvested organ(s). Here, we propose MIAME/Plant, a standard describing which biological details to be captured for describing microarray experiments involving plants. We expect that a more detailed and more systematic annotation of microarray experiments will greatly increase the use of transcriptome data sets for the scientific community. The power and value of systematic annotation of microarray data is convincingly demonstrated by data warehouses such as Genevestigator(R) or NASCArrays, and better experimental annotation will make these applications even more powerful.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 16401339      PMCID: PMC1334190          DOI: 10.1186/1746-4811-2-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Methods        ISSN: 1746-4811            Impact factor:   4.993


High-throughput technologies are rapidly reshaping the plant research landscape. Gene expression microarrays, in particular, have impacted our way of thinking and challenged our concepts about research by providing genome-wide results at an increasing rate. A recent search in PubMed with the terms "microarray" and "plant" yielded more than 600 references, most of which report results obtained using RNA profiling technology. A major portion of the published datasets can be obtained via repositories, as supplements to scientific publications, or from the authors directly. Precise experiment annotation, however, that is easily accessible and suitable for comparisons, reproduction and/or correct interpretation of experiments is not always fully available. In fact, standard terms to describe conditions for plant microarray experiments so far have not been defined. While the technical details of a microarray experiment are usually abundant, the biological details are frequently poorly described, unsystematic between laboratories, or even missing. MIAME (Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment) is a standard that provides a conceptual framework for core information to be captured from most microarray experiments [1]. The microarray community has been very favorable to the establishment and implementation of this standard. Manufacturers, software developers and international databases have contributed to the development and adoption of the MIAME guidelines. Many scientists reporting microarray experiments now use this standard, which is required by an increasing number of scientific journals. The MIAME standard has proven very useful so far. Data from repositories can be grouped according to standardized categories with respect to technology platform, labeling and hybridization procedures, measurement data, and array design. Nevertheless, experiment descriptions remained unsatisfactory for many researchers browsing databases, because the use of a common denominator for all biological sciences makes a full annotation of specialized community-level research difficult. Specifically, the core MIAME standard is limited in its ability to capture domain-specific information on experimental design and sample preparation. Readers of publications describing plant microarray experiments are not only interested in hybridization or normalization protocols, but also e.g. whether the plants were grown under high or low light conditions, on soil or in vitro, or which organs where harvested at what age etc. Domain-specific extensions of the existing general MIAME standard are needed to collect experimental annotation in a structured way. MIAME/Plant, MIAME/Env and MIAME/Tox are such extensions [2-4]. In plant science, the use of benchmark terminology for growth stages [5] and plant organs [6] so far has allowed the pioneering development of powerful tools for data storage and analysis [7-9]. The rapidly increasing number of microarray studies on plants, together with the prospect of effective data querying by annotation of experimental parameters using controlled vocabularies, now requires a plant-specific MIAME standard. The objective of MIAME/Plant is to facilitate and normalize experiment and sample annotations (Figure 1). This will make annotation browsing and data analysis much easier for end-users, including experimental biologists. More specifically, MIAME/Plant incorporates the core MIAME standard together with a supplementary guideline for experimental description and design and sample preparation protocols (see Figures 1 and 2 for more details). The current complete MIAME/Plant guidelines can be downloaded from the Microarray Gene Expression Data Society, from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Center and from The Arabidopsis Information Resource websites [10-12]. Currently, MIAME/Plant is being implemented in international repositories [13], and user-friendly tools will further encourage the establishment of these guidelines in the plant community.
Figure 1

A schematic representation of the six components of a microarray experiment as defined by MIAME (Brazma et al., 2001). The MIAME/Plant parameters and ontologies extend the basic experiment and sample annotations.

Figure 2

Overview of the main classes of ontologies currently represented in MIAME/Plant.

A schematic representation of the six components of a microarray experiment as defined by MIAME (Brazma et al., 2001). The MIAME/Plant parameters and ontologies extend the basic experiment and sample annotations. Overview of the main classes of ontologies currently represented in MIAME/Plant. The implementation of MIAME/Plant should not create an extra burden on the experimenter, but will enable a targeted workflow through the annotation process that is facilitated by structured data entry forms. While all reported experiments should adhere to MIAME, we do not propose to enforce that every experiment should be annotated to the full detail of MIAME/Plant. Instead, laboratories that decide to collect additional information are encouraged to follow the MIAME/Plant scheme. Systematic and controlled annotation will generate breakthroughs in data mining capabilities, and therefore we encourage the plant community to adopt the MIAME/Plant standard. We expect that the benefits of domain-specific MIAME extensions will also motivate researchers in other fields to develop better community standards.
  8 in total

1.  Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data.

Authors:  A Brazma; P Hingamp; J Quackenbush; G Sherlock; P Spellman; C Stoeckert; J Aach; W Ansorge; C A Ball; H C Causton; T Gaasterland; P Glenisson; F C Holstege; I F Kim; V Markowitz; J C Matese; H Parkinson; A Robinson; U Sarkans; S Schulze-Kremer; J Stewart; R Taylor; J Vilo; M Vingron
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Growth stage-based phenotypic analysis of Arabidopsis: a model for high throughput functional genomics in plants.

Authors:  D C Boyes; A M Zayed; R Ascenzi; A J McCaskill; N E Hoffman; K R Davis; J Görlach
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  GENEVESTIGATOR. Arabidopsis microarray database and analysis toolbox.

Authors:  Philip Zimmermann; Matthias Hirsch-Hoffmann; Lars Hennig; Wilhelm Gruissem
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  A database for tracking toxicogenomic samples and procedures.

Authors:  Wenjun Bao; Judith E Schmid; Amber K Goetz; Hongzu Ren; David J Dix
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.143

5.  Plant-based microarray data at the European Bioinformatics Institute. Introducing AtMIAMExpress, a submission tool for Arabidopsis gene expression data to ArrayExpress.

Authors:  Gaurab Mukherjee; Niran Abeygunawardena; Helen Parkinson; Sergio Contrino; Steffen Durinck; Anna Farne; Ele Holloway; Per Lilja; Yves Moreau; Ahmet Oezcimen; Tim Rayner; Anjan Sharma; Alvis Brazma; Ugis Sarkans; Mohammadreza Shojatalab
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): a model organism database providing a centralized, curated gateway to Arabidopsis biology, research materials and community.

Authors:  Seung Yon Rhee; William Beavis; Tanya Z Berardini; Guanghong Chen; David Dixon; Aisling Doyle; Margarita Garcia-Hernandez; Eva Huala; Gabriel Lander; Mary Montoya; Neil Miller; Lukas A Mueller; Suparna Mundodi; Leonore Reiser; Julie Tacklind; Dan C Weems; Yihe Wu; Iris Xu; Daniel Yoo; Jungwon Yoon; Peifen Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Bioinformatics and data management support for environmental genomics.

Authors:  Dawn Field; Bela Tiwari; Jason Snape
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  NASCArrays: a repository for microarray data generated by NASC's transcriptomics service.

Authors:  David J Craigon; Nick James; John Okyere; Janet Higgins; Joan Jotham; Sean May
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

  8 in total
  17 in total

1.  Robin: an intuitive wizard application for R-based expression microarray quality assessment and analysis.

Authors:  Marc Lohse; Adriano Nunes-Nesi; Peter Krüger; Axel Nagel; Jan Hannemann; Federico M Giorgi; Liam Childs; Sonia Osorio; Dirk Walther; Joachim Selbig; Nese Sreenivasulu; Mark Stitt; Alisdair R Fernie; Björn Usadel
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Cross-talk between singlet oxygen- and hydrogen peroxide-dependent signaling of stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Christophe Laloi; Monika Stachowiak; Emilia Pers-Kamczyc; Ewelina Warzych; Irene Murgia; Klaus Apel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  PHENOPSIS DB: an information system for Arabidopsis thaliana phenotypic data in an environmental context.

Authors:  Juliette Fabre; Myriam Dauzat; Vincent Nègre; Nathalie Wuyts; Anne Tireau; Emilie Gennari; Pascal Neveu; Sébastien Tisné; Catherine Massonnet; Irène Hummel; Christine Granier
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 4.215

4.  Probing the reproducibility of leaf growth and molecular phenotypes: a comparison of three Arabidopsis accessions cultivated in ten laboratories.

Authors:  Catherine Massonnet; Denis Vile; Juliette Fabre; Matthew A Hannah; Camila Caldana; Jan Lisec; Gerrit T S Beemster; Rhonda C Meyer; Gaëlle Messerli; Jesper T Gronlund; Josip Perkovic; Emma Wigmore; Sean May; Michael W Bevan; Christian Meyer; Silvia Rubio-Díaz; Detlef Weigel; José Luis Micol; Vicky Buchanan-Wollaston; Fabio Fiorani; Sean Walsh; Bernd Rinn; Wilhelm Gruissem; Pierre Hilson; Lars Hennig; Lothar Willmitzer; Christine Granier
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 5.  E-photosynthesis: a comprehensive modeling approach to understand chlorophyll fluorescence transients and other complex dynamic features of photosynthesis in fluctuating light.

Authors:  Ladislav Nedbal; Jan Cervený; Uwe Rascher; Henning Schmidt
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 3.429

6.  Multifunctional crop trait ontology for breeders' data: field book, annotation, data discovery and semantic enrichment of the literature.

Authors:  Rosemary Shrestha; Elizabeth Arnaud; Ramil Mauleon; Martin Senger; Guy F Davenport; David Hancock; Norman Morrison; Richard Bruskiewich; Graham McLaren
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 3.276

7.  Meeting Report from the Second "Minimum Information for Biological and Biomedical Investigations" (MIBBI) workshop.

Authors:  Carsten Kettner; Dawn Field; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Chris Taylor; Jan Aerts; Nigel Binns; Andrew Blake; Cedrik M Britten; Ario de Marco; Jennifer Fostel; Pascale Gaudet; Alejandra González-Beltrán; Nigel Hardy; Jan Hellemans; Henning Hermjakob; Nick Juty; Jim Leebens-Mack; Eamonn Maguire; Steffen Neumann; Sandra Orchard; Helen Parkinson; William Piel; Shoba Ranganathan; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Annapaola Santarsiero; David Shotton; Peter Sterk; Andreas Untergasser; Patricia L Whetzel
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2010-12-25

8.  PLEXdb: gene expression resources for plants and plant pathogens.

Authors:  Sudhansu Dash; John Van Hemert; Lu Hong; Roger P Wise; Julie A Dickerson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Web-based analysis of the mouse transcriptome using Genevestigator.

Authors:  Oliver Laule; Matthias Hirsch-Hoffmann; Tomas Hruz; Wilhelm Gruissem; Philip Zimmermann
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  A plant resource and experiment management system based on the Golm Plant Database as a basic tool for omics research.

Authors:  Karin I Köhl; Georg Basler; Alexander Lüdemann; Joachim Selbig; Dirk Walther
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 4.993

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.