Literature DB >> 16400080

Semen parameters in Norwegian fertile men.

Trine B Haugen1, Thore Egeland, Oystein Magnus.   

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) provides guidelines for assessing the various semen variables. A set of reference ranges is given in the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction, but several studies indicate that the values should be revised. Furthermore, semen parameters obtained at different laboratories are not directly comparable even if the same methods are used. Thus, it is recommended that each laboratory establish its own reference ranges. In this study, semen from 99 men who had recently achieved a pregnancy were analyzed to establish reference ranges for semen variables. The reference values were based on the group with time to pregnancy (TTP) 12 cycles or less (92%) and abstinence time from 2 to 7 days. The 5th and 10th percentiles for sperm concentration were 10.6 and 16.9 x 10(6)/mL, respectively, and 33% (5th percentile) and 43% (10th percentile) for spermatozoa with progressive motility. These values were below the WHO lower limit. The percentages of ideal spermatozoa (percentage with normal morphology according to WHO strict criteria) were 3 (5th percentile) and 4 (10th percentile). Thirty-nine percent reported that their partners became pregnant during the first cycle after they had stopped using contraception. The semen parameters in this group were compared with the others. Overall, the semen parameters were more favorable in the group with TTP = 1 cycle than in the group with TTP > 1. Sperm concentration, progressive motility, and percentage of ideal spermatozoa according to WHO strict criteria were significantly different in the 2 groups. However, when analyzed by multiple logistic regression, only "total numbers of sperm with progressive motility" remained in the model (P = .002). This is in accordance with previous studies indicating that a combination of semen characteristics provides a better predictor of male fertility potential than the single parameters. In conclusion, new reference ranges for semen variables deviating from the WHO values are established for our laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16400080     DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.05010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Androl        ISSN: 0196-3635


  13 in total

1.  Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the fifth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen.

Authors:  Roelof Menkveld
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  The usefulness and significance of assessing rapidly progressive spermatozoa.

Authors:  Lars Björndahl
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 3.  Measurement and significance of sperm morphology.

Authors:  Roelof Menkveld; Cas A G Holleboom; Johann P T Rhemrev
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in unexplained and stage I endometriosis-associated infertility after fertilization failure with in vitro fertilization (IVF).

Authors:  Anne K Omland; Sverre Bjercke; Gudvor Ertzeid; Peter Fedorcsák; Nan B Oldereid; Ritsa Storeng; Thomas Abyholm; Tom Tanbo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  A Survey on Main Semen Parameters in Natural Pregnancy and Intrauterine Insemination: Are There Any Significant Differences?

Authors:  Roshanak Aboutorabi; Soudabeh Zamani; Yasaman Zarrin; Fatemeh Sadat Mostafavi
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-05-04

6.  Assessing human sperm morphology: top models, underdogs or biometrics?

Authors:  Jacques Auger
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Sperm quality changes in survivors of severe burns.

Authors:  P I Jewo; I O Fadeyibi; L C Saalu; O I Akinola; F I Duru; S A Ademiluyi
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2009-09-30

8.  The statistical foundation of the reference population for semen analysis included in the sixth edition of the WHO manual: a critical reappraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  Alessio Paffoni; Edgardo Somigliana; Luca Boeri; Paola Viganò
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 6.353

9.  Semen quality and time to pregnancy: the Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment Study.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Enrique F Schisterman; Anne Sweeney; Courtney D Lynch; Sungduk Kim; José M Maisog; Robert Gore-Langton; Michael L Eisenberg; Zhen Chen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Semen quality in men from subfertile couples from the region of Łódź (Poland) according to the new reference values recommended by WHO 2010.

Authors:  Waldemar Różański; Wiesław Szymczak; Małgorzata Wójt; Sławomir Sobakiewicz; Marek Lipiński; Katarzyna Marchlewska; Małgorzata Gołąb-Lipińska; Elżbieta Oszukowska
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2011-03-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.